Clarify-no-really the part about talking to the EC.

The goal here is to say:

a) Here are some principles
b) Here are how to deal with someone violating these principles.
c) Talking to the EC is not the wrong answer, and is orthogonal to
  (a) and (b)

1 files changed, 10 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/code-of-conduct.txt b/code-of-conduct.txt
index d99f46c..af61619 100644
--- a/code-of-conduct.txt
+++ b/code-of-conduct.txt
@@ -134,15 +134,18 @@ Our social principles and clarifying guidelines are intended to be a set
 of things we can mutually agree to strive to live by as a community.
 They aren't intended to be a stick to beat people with for "being bad".
 However, it's still important that people be able to help improve the
-social environment when they see something they think is destructive.  
-Under any circumstance, however, if someone's behavior or speech in
-the office is making you feel uncomfortable or unwelcome, please
-contact a member of the EC.
+social environment when they see something they think is destructive,
+the following paragraphs describe the best way to go about it.  Under 
+any circumstance, however, if someone's behavior or speech in the
+office is making you feel uncomfortable or unwelcome, and you do not
+feel comfortable talking to that person, please contact a member of
+the EC.
 
 If you feel someone has contributed negatively to a SIPB social
-environment (in the office, on a SIPB email list, on our zephyr classes,
-etc.), we encourage you to reach out to that person (or the intended
-target, if you are a third party) and discuss your thoughts with them.
+environment (in the office, on a SIPB email list, on our zephyr
+classes, etc.), we encourage you to reach out to that person (or the
+intended target, if you are a third party) and discuss your thoughts
+with them.
 
 Publicly calling someone out is generally ill-suited to any electronic
 medium, because it can result in a heated conversation that is not only