summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGravatar Adam Glasgall <glasgall@mit.edu>2014-02-27 22:23:27 -0500
committerGravatar Adam Glasgall <glasgall@mit.edu>2014-02-27 22:23:27 -0500
commit073a868f7237ca75b03b031658b14bdf73a60119 (patch)
treebdccd6a3b0de7fc5d6b0b738cbca8cc49b3dffd1
parent733ff2638b4a5e7d9c1a5c98fe95b603911f767f (diff)
minor grammar/usage corrections, courtesy kaduk and wings
-rw-r--r--code-of-conduct.txt24
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/code-of-conduct.txt b/code-of-conduct.txt
index af61619..05cad86 100644
--- a/code-of-conduct.txt
+++ b/code-of-conduct.txt
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ SIPB Social Principles
SIPB is an awesome place for interacting with computers, but there are
people here too! Sometimes though, the line between these gets blurred
-in our heads, and we end up interacting with people like they are
+in our heads, and we end up interacting with people as if they are
machines, which results in a sour experience for all parties involved.
So, we've come up with a set of core principles that we feel is
important to keep in mind when interacting with our mortal
@@ -39,21 +39,21 @@ might think that such criticism might be directed at them if they make
an error.
This doesn't mean you can't give people suggestions on how to do
-better, but please don't do so in a way that suggests that they're bad
-person for doing what they did, that they should have done better, or
-that their contribution wasn't worth making.
+better, but please don't do so in a way that suggests that they're a
+bad person for doing what they did, that they should have done better,
+or that their contribution wasn't worth making.
Be careful expressing surprise
This first principle is aimed at discouraging the practice of acting
-overly surprised when some says they don't know something. This
+overly surprised when someone says they don't know something. This
applies to both technical things ("What?! I can't believe you don't
know what Hesiod is!") and non-technical things ("You don't know who
RMS is?!"). That's not to say you may not be genuinely surprised when
someone doesn't know something that you have taken for granted. But
consider whether the person, who has already admitted to not knowing
something, wants to be further reminded of it by your reaction. Even
-when it's not your intention to upset someone, it's almost ways the
+when it's not your intention to upset someone, it's almost always the
end result.
We want SIPB to be a place where people feel safe saying "I don't
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ nc(1) are.
Avoid over-correcting others ("Well, actually...")
-It's hard to resist the urge to demonstrate your knowledge about a
+It's hard to resist the urge to demonstrate your knowledge of a
subject; SIPB is as much as place for teaching as it is a place for
learning. However, it can be really off-putting when that urge
manifests itself by someone over-correcting someone else, usually by
@@ -77,10 +77,10 @@ what you tell them, they remember how you make them feel.
Back-seat driving is disruptive
-If you overhear people working through a problem, avoid
-intermittently lobbing advice across the room. This can lead to the "too
-many cooks" problem, but more important, it can be rude and disruptive
-to half-participate in a conversation. This isn't to say you shouldn't
+If you overhear people working through a problem, avoid intermittently
+lobbing advice across the room. This can lead to the "too many cooks"
+problem, but more importantly, it can be rude and disruptive to
+half-participate in a conversation. This isn't to say you shouldn't
help, offer advice, or join conversations. On the contrary, we
encourage all those things. Rather, it just means that when you want
to help out or work with others, you should fully engage and not just
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ Our social principles and clarifying guidelines are intended to be a set
of things we can mutually agree to strive to live by as a community.
They aren't intended to be a stick to beat people with for "being bad".
However, it's still important that people be able to help improve the
-social environment when they see something they think is destructive,
+social environment when they see something they think is destructive;
the following paragraphs describe the best way to go about it. Under
any circumstance, however, if someone's behavior or speech in the
office is making you feel uncomfortable or unwelcome, and you do not