Removed all "Introduced in..." comments

Since FUSE 3 is breaking backwards compatibility, this really does
not matter.

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 26 deletions

diff --git a/include/fuse_lowlevel.h b/include/fuse_lowlevel.h
index db15083..8ec95b5 100644
--- a/include/fuse_lowlevel.h
+++ b/include/fuse_lowlevel.h
@@ -766,8 +766,6 @@ struct fuse_lowlevel_ops {
 	 *
 	 * This method is not called under Linux kernel versions 2.4.x
 	 *
-	 * Introduced in version 2.5
-	 *
 	 * Valid replies:
 	 *   fuse_reply_err
 	 *
@@ -798,8 +796,6 @@ struct fuse_lowlevel_ops {
 	 * versions earlier than 2.6.15, the mknod() and open() methods
 	 * will be called instead.
 	 *
-	 * Introduced in version 2.5
-	 *
 	 * Valid replies:
 	 *   fuse_reply_create
 	 *   fuse_reply_err
@@ -816,8 +812,6 @@ struct fuse_lowlevel_ops {
 	/**
 	 * Test for a POSIX file lock
 	 *
-	 * Introduced in version 2.6
-	 *
 	 * Valid replies:
 	 *   fuse_reply_lock
 	 *   fuse_reply_err
@@ -843,8 +837,6 @@ struct fuse_lowlevel_ops {
 	 * will still allow file locking to work locally.  Hence these are
 	 * only interesting for network filesystems and similar.
 	 *
-	 * Introduced in version 2.6
-	 *
 	 * Valid replies:
 	 *   fuse_reply_err
 	 *
@@ -864,8 +856,6 @@ struct fuse_lowlevel_ops {
 	 * Note: This makes sense only for block device backed filesystems
 	 * mounted with the 'blkdev' option
 	 *
-	 * Introduced in version 2.6
-	 *
 	 * Valid replies:
 	 *   fuse_reply_bmap
 	 *   fuse_reply_err
@@ -887,8 +877,6 @@ struct fuse_lowlevel_ops {
 	 * restricted ioctls, kernel prepares in/out data area
 	 * according to the information encoded in cmd.
 	 *
-	 * Introduced in version 2.8
-	 *
 	 * Valid replies:
 	 *   fuse_reply_ioctl_retry
 	 *   fuse_reply_ioctl
@@ -912,8 +900,6 @@ struct fuse_lowlevel_ops {
 	/**
 	 * Poll for IO readiness
 	 *
-	 * Introduced in version 2.8
-	 *
 	 * Note: If ph is non-NULL, the client should notify
 	 * when IO readiness events occur by calling
 	 * fuse_lowelevel_notify_poll() with the specified ph.
@@ -952,8 +938,6 @@ struct fuse_lowlevel_ops {
 	 * bufv->off is correctly updated (reflecting the number of
 	 * bytes read from bufv->buf[0]).
 	 *
-	 * Introduced in version 2.9
-	 *
 	 * Valid replies:
 	 *   fuse_reply_write
 	 *   fuse_reply_err
@@ -971,8 +955,6 @@ struct fuse_lowlevel_ops {
 	/**
 	 * Callback function for the retrieve request
 	 *
-	 * Introduced in version 2.9
-	 *
 	 * Valid replies:
 	 *	fuse_reply_none
 	 *
@@ -991,8 +973,6 @@ struct fuse_lowlevel_ops {
 	 * See description of the forget function for more
 	 * information.
 	 *
-	 * Introduced in version 2.9
-	 *
 	 * Valid replies:
 	 *   fuse_reply_none
 	 *
@@ -1008,8 +988,6 @@ struct fuse_lowlevel_ops {
 	 * will still allow file locking to work locally.  Hence these are
 	 * only interesting for network filesystems and similar.
 	 *
-	 * Introduced in version 2.9
-	 *
 	 * Valid replies:
 	 *   fuse_reply_err
 	 *
@@ -1026,8 +1004,6 @@ struct fuse_lowlevel_ops {
 	 * subsequent writes to the specified range shall not fail due to the lack
 	 * of free space on the file system storage media.
 	 *
-	 * Introduced in version 2.9
-	 *
 	 * Valid replies:
 	 *   fuse_reply_err
 	 *
@@ -1055,8 +1031,6 @@ struct fuse_lowlevel_ops {
 	 * the lookup count of every entry returned by readdirplus(), except "."
 	 * and "..", is incremented by one.
 	 *
-	 * Introduced in version 3.0
-	 *
 	 * Valid replies:
 	 *   fuse_reply_buf
 	 *   fuse_reply_data