1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
|
Greetings all!
I have only been using git-annex for a few days, but I am loving it so far.
I have run into one problem:
At the top of a directory tree with some very large (GB+) blobs, I issue this command:
find . -size +5M -exec git-annex add --debug {} \; 2>&1 | tee -a ./annex-add.log
When the command completes, I see a number of these types of errors in the log:
[2015-10-05 21:14:13.502615] chat: git ["--git-dir=.git","--work-tree=.","--literal-pathspecs","cat-file","--batch"]
[2015-10-05 21:14:13.521586] chat: git ["--git-dir=.git","--work-tree=.","--literal-pathspecs","cat-file","--batch"]
[2015-10-05 21:14:13.533095] read: git ["--git-dir=.git","--work-tree=.","--literal-pathspecs","diff","--name-only","--diff-filter=T","-z","--","./application/mozilla/firefox/linux/firefox-39.0/media/firefox-39.0.tar.bz2"]
[2015-10-05 21:14:13.545739] feed: xargs ["-0","git","--git-dir=.git","--work-tree=.","--literal-pathspecs","add","--"]
[2015-10-05 21:14:13.562727] process done ExitSuccess
[2015-10-05 21:14:13.564103] chat: git ["--git-dir=.git","--work-tree=.","--literal-pathspecs","hash-object","-w","--stdin-paths","--no-filters"]
[2015-10-05 21:14:13.56616] feed: git ["--git-dir=.git","--work-tree=.","--literal-pathspecs","update-index","-z","--index-info"]
[2015-10-05 21:14:13.58032] process done ExitSuccess
fatal: Out of memory, getdelim failed
[2015-10-05 21:14:13.582109] process done ExitFailure 128
ok
(recording state in git...)
git-annex: user error (git ["--git-dir=.git","--work-tree=.","--literal-pathspecs","hash-object","-w","--stdin-paths","--no-filters"] exited 128)
I've googled around and searched the forums/bug reports here without much success.
I have tried setting the queuesize to smaller values, but that does not seem to help.
I am using git-annex version: 5.20150930-g40fdbe9 on RHEL 6.
I am happy to help debug further...
Thanks,
JC
P.S. - Is it normal that some links in the .git dir are created without user write access?
|
