aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/todo/wishlist:_define_remotes_that_must_have_all_files
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/todo/wishlist:_define_remotes_that_must_have_all_files')
-rw-r--r--doc/todo/wishlist:_define_remotes_that_must_have_all_files/comment_1_cceccc1a1730ac688d712b81a44e31c3._comment10
-rw-r--r--doc/todo/wishlist:_define_remotes_that_must_have_all_files/comment_2_eec848fcf3979c03cbff2b7407c75a7a._comment16
2 files changed, 0 insertions, 26 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/wishlist:_define_remotes_that_must_have_all_files/comment_1_cceccc1a1730ac688d712b81a44e31c3._comment b/doc/todo/wishlist:_define_remotes_that_must_have_all_files/comment_1_cceccc1a1730ac688d712b81a44e31c3._comment
deleted file mode 100644
index 1f65fd982..000000000
--- a/doc/todo/wishlist:_define_remotes_that_must_have_all_files/comment_1_cceccc1a1730ac688d712b81a44e31c3._comment
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
-[[!comment format=mdwn
- username="http://joey.kitenet.net/"
- nickname="joey"
- subject="comment 1"
- date="2011-04-23T16:27:13Z"
- content="""
-Seems to have a scalability problem, what happens when such a repository becomes full?
-
-Another way to accomplish I think the same thing is to pick the repositories that you would include in such a set, and make all other repositories untrusted. And set numcopies as desired. Then git-annex will never remove files from the set of non-untrusted repositories, and fsck will warn if a file is present on only an untrusted repository.
-"""]]
diff --git a/doc/todo/wishlist:_define_remotes_that_must_have_all_files/comment_2_eec848fcf3979c03cbff2b7407c75a7a._comment b/doc/todo/wishlist:_define_remotes_that_must_have_all_files/comment_2_eec848fcf3979c03cbff2b7407c75a7a._comment
deleted file mode 100644
index 1855cdda0..000000000
--- a/doc/todo/wishlist:_define_remotes_that_must_have_all_files/comment_2_eec848fcf3979c03cbff2b7407c75a7a._comment
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,16 +0,0 @@
-[[!comment format=mdwn
- username="gernot"
- ip="87.79.209.169"
- subject="comment 2"
- date="2011-04-24T11:20:05Z"
- content="""
-Right, I have thought about untrusting all but a few remotes to achieve
-something similar before and I'm sure it would kind of work. It would be more
-of an ugly workaround, however, because I would have to untrust remotes that
-are, in reality, at least semi-trusted. That's why an extra option/attribute
-for that kind of purpose/remote would be nice.
-
-Obviously I didn't see the scalability problem though. Good Point. Maybe I can
-achieve the same thing by writing a log parsing script for myself?
-
-"""]]