diff options
2 files changed, 31 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/dropkey_--batch_--json_--force_is_always_succesfull/comment_2_ed5dfbc812e20efa4650a7a4684faa6d._comment b/doc/bugs/dropkey_--batch_--json_--force_is_always_succesfull/comment_2_ed5dfbc812e20efa4650a7a4684faa6d._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6c95675ca --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/dropkey_--batch_--json_--force_is_always_succesfull/comment_2_ed5dfbc812e20efa4650a7a4684faa6d._comment @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="https://me.yahoo.com/a/EbvxpTI_xP9Aod7Mg4cwGhgjrCrdM5s-#7c0f4" + subject="comment 2" + date="2016-05-03T17:53:41Z" + content=""" +gotcha -- so it is a feature, so you could mark this one \"done\" + +But note, that although --force is indeed not necessary it is required atm + +[[!format sh \"\"\" +$> echo MD5E-s11--74d80f7d99b835e5189948c8d4297efd | git annex dropkey --batch --json +git-annex: dropkey can cause data loss; use --force if you're sure you want to do this + +$> echo MD5E-s11--74d80f7d99b835e5189948c8d4297efd | git annex dropkey --batch --json --force +{\"command\":\"dropkey\",\"key\":\"MD5E-s11--74d80f7d99b835e5189948c8d4297efd\",\"success\":true} + +$> git annex version +git-annex version: 6.20160425+gitgffe2ea2-1~ndall+1 + +\"\"\"]] +"""]] diff --git a/doc/design/external_special_remote_protocol/comment_27_9153a5c49710bf57d11338829f66fa78._comment b/doc/design/external_special_remote_protocol/comment_27_9153a5c49710bf57d11338829f66fa78._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5061c0a88 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/design/external_special_remote_protocol/comment_27_9153a5c49710bf57d11338829f66fa78._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="grawity@2ea26be48562f66fcb9b66307da72b1e2e37453f" + nickname="grawity" + subject="comment 27" + date="2016-05-03T18:02:03Z" + content=""" +Thanks. It'll probably be safer for my use case of storing data on Windows network shares than the mixed-case version. + +_(Speaking of \"too late to change\", `DIRHASH-LOWER` with a dash might be more consistent with the existing responses?)_ +"""]] |