diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/todo/support_fsck_in_bare_repos.mdwn | 10 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/support_fsck_in_bare_repos.mdwn b/doc/todo/support_fsck_in_bare_repos.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b126a8170 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/support_fsck_in_bare_repos.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +What is says on the tin: + + + 22:56:54 < RichiH> joeyh_: by the way, i have been thinking about fsck on bare repos + 22:57:37 < RichiH> joeyh_: the best i could come with is to have a bare and a non-bare access the same repo store + 22:58:00 < RichiH> joeyh_: alternatively, with the SHA* backend, you have all the information to verify that the local data is correct + 22:58:41 < RichiH> and verifying that would already be a plus. if there really _is_ a problem, having the SHA is enough to track issues down + 23:09:50 < joeyh_> oh, I think I have code that fsck could use on bare repos already.. just a matter of wiring it up + 23:10:42 < joeyh_> feel free to reopen a bug or whatever so I remember.. the unused command's branch content enumeration could be used in a bare repo + 23:14:51 < joeyh_> unused/dropunused could work in bare repos too btw |