removed

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 17 deletions

diff --git a/doc/forum/v5_to_v6_upgrade_strategy/comment_2_c84054b4174bb89009147ab874891f7a._comment b/doc/forum/v5_to_v6_upgrade_strategy/comment_2_c84054b4174bb89009147ab874891f7a._comment
deleted file mode 100644
index 6933cb7a8..000000000
--- a/doc/forum/v5_to_v6_upgrade_strategy/comment_2_c84054b4174bb89009147ab874891f7a._comment
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
-[[!comment format=mdwn
- username="Stan"
- subject="comment 2"
- date="2016-06-28T23:04:57Z"
- content="""
-Many thanks for the reply. I did not add too much detail to my post as it was my first, and I was a bit shy.
-
-I did do all of the steps indicated re v6. The binary has been fine for me also.
-
-My question is a bit more complex as I am looking to apply v6 at some point to a set of distributed repos. Essentially it has the typical duplicated system topology: 2 remotes, several clients, each of which is linked to both remotes. Thus it will survive multiple failure scenarios.
-
-I would be looking at the strategy of the order of repo upgrade. Say, a client first, and run a set of tests. And so on. Remotes last perhaps.
-
-In any case I build a test bed as above and have been experimenting with a single client at a v6 repo.
-
-So far it has been smooth, but right now I seem to be stuck where thinning is not having any effect: I still have a particular big file (1.5GB) in both the annex and the working dir. Lock removes the big file from the working dir, and leaves a link, and unlock restores the big file in the working dir. Yet, the annex still contains the big file no matter what. I was under the expectation that one of the big file copies would go away.
-"""]]