aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGravatar zack <zack@web>2016-08-22 14:19:57 +0000
committerGravatar admin <admin@branchable.com>2016-08-22 14:19:57 +0000
commit4d1bb0beb8c7ce7ff307e204d8bbabbac9f06fd7 (patch)
treee38d5496d2a81d8dae9dfb14091b23ed581a3f23
parent1158a2bb1a0f142930e99028d16ae41299910ca2 (diff)
Added a comment: adjusted branche to "focus" on a specific subtree
-rw-r--r--doc/design/adjusted_branches/comment_5_882520747d41500d0ea8a18ab817121c._comment22
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/design/adjusted_branches/comment_5_882520747d41500d0ea8a18ab817121c._comment b/doc/design/adjusted_branches/comment_5_882520747d41500d0ea8a18ab817121c._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..91f5d824c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/design/adjusted_branches/comment_5_882520747d41500d0ea8a18ab817121c._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="zack"
+ subject="adjusted branche to &quot;focus&quot; on a specific subtree"
+ date="2016-08-22T14:19:57Z"
+ content="""
+I'm having hard time supporting the following use case with git-annex:
+
+* using git annex so that \"git annex sync --content\" import in batch pictures from a camera SD card
+* destination of the import is a \"pictures/INCOMING\" subdir of a larger \"multimedia archive\" annex
+* I do not want to have all the other folders of the annex (parent and siblings of pictures/INCOMING) present on the SD card
+
+I wonder if adjusted branches might be a solution to this.
+Do I get it right that \"unlocked\" is currently the only supported kind of adjustment?
+
+If so, I'm not sure what would be needed to make the above use case feasible.
+At first sight though, commits int the adjusted branch that \"mounts\" pictures/INCOMING/ are conceptually easy to translate to the main branch: the changes would be the same, only they'll have to be applied in a specific subtree.
+They won't merge cleanly though.
+
+Is this an interesting/worthwhile use case for adjusted branches, or am I looking into the wrong part of git-annex design?
+
+Thanks for this amazing tool!
+"""]]