summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/theories/Logic/ChoiceFacts.v
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'theories/Logic/ChoiceFacts.v')
-rw-r--r--theories/Logic/ChoiceFacts.v8
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/theories/Logic/ChoiceFacts.v b/theories/Logic/ChoiceFacts.v
index a1f4417c..87d8a70e 100644
--- a/theories/Logic/ChoiceFacts.v
+++ b/theories/Logic/ChoiceFacts.v
@@ -6,14 +6,14 @@
(* * GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1 *)
(************************************************************************)
-(*i $Id: ChoiceFacts.v,v 1.7.2.1 2004/07/16 19:31:06 herbelin Exp $ i*)
+(*i $Id: ChoiceFacts.v,v 1.7.2.2 2004/08/01 09:29:59 herbelin Exp $ i*)
-(* We show that the functional formulation of the axiom of Choice
+(** We show that the functional formulation of the axiom of Choice
(usual formulation in type theory) is equivalent to its relational
formulation (only formulation of set theory) + the axiom of
(parametric) definite description (aka axiom of unique choice) *)
-(* This shows that the axiom of choice can be assumed (under its
+(** This shows that the axiom of choice can be assumed (under its
relational formulation) without known inconsistency with classical logic,
though definite description conflicts with classical logic *)
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ intro H; split;
intros [H H0]; exact (description_rel_choice_imp_funct_choice H0 H).
Qed.
-(* We show that the guarded relational formulation of the axiom of Choice
+(** We show that the guarded relational formulation of the axiom of Choice
comes from the non guarded formulation in presence either of the
independance of premises or proof-irrelevance *)