summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Chalice/tests/examples/CopyLessMessagePassing-with-ack.chalice
blob: 9ed9f0a9dfadd8f66b0060529de73ebe67d26326 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
// program inspired by "Proving Copyless Message Passing" (Villard, Lozes and Calcagno, APLAS 2009)

// msg tag indicates what the type of the message
// channel is freed by Getter when it completes
// ack works, but an assume is needed and negative credits are sent over channels! 

// Conjecture: it is ok to send debit for yourself over yourself.
// Why: Suppose a channel that allows self-debt is involved in a deadlock. The either that channel is empty, which means there's no difference between the situation with or with self-debt. Or the channel is non-empty. This means that we can make progress by receiving the message stored in the channel! Does this make any sense?

channel C(msg: int, n: Node) where 
  (msg == 0 || msg == 1 || msg == 2) &&
  (msg == 0 ==> credit(this, -1)) && // ack
  (msg == 1 ==> n != null && acc(n.next) && acc(n.mu) && credit(this, -1)) && // cell
  (msg == 2 ==> acc(this.mu, 50)); // done
  

class Node {
  var next: Node;
  
  function length(): int
    requires this.list;
  {
    unfolding this.list in 1 + (next == null ? 0 : next.length())
  }
  
  predicate list {
    acc(next) && acc(mu) && (next != null ==> next.list)
  }
}

class Program {
  method Putter(e: C, x0: Node) 
    requires e!= null && acc(e.mu, 50) && e.mu == waitlevel && (x0 != null ==> x0.list) && (x0 != null ==> credit(e, - 1));
  {
    var x: Node := x0;
    var t: Node;
    
    while(x != null) 
      invariant (x != null ==> x.list) && acc(e.mu, 50) && credit(e, - 1);
    {
      unfold x.list;
      t := x.next;
      send e(1, x);
      x := t;
      var ack;
      assume waitlevel << e.mu; // Chalice should be able to figure this out itself
      receive ack, t := e;
      if(ack != 2) { assume false; /* abort */ }
    }
    send e(2, null);
  }  
  
  method Getter(f: C) 
    requires f!= null && credit(f, 1) && acc(f.mu, 50) && waitlevel << f.mu;
  {
    var x: Node := null;
    var msg := 1;
    while(msg != 0)
      invariant msg == 0 || msg == 1;
      invariant acc(f.mu, 50) && waitlevel << f.mu && (credit(f, 1));
    {
      assert msg == 1
      receive msg, x := f;
      
      if(msg == 1) {
        free x;
      }
      send f(0, null);
      if(msg == 2) { assume false; /* abort */ }
    }
    receive msg, x := f;
    if (msg != 2) { assume false; /* abort */ }
    free f; // close the channel
  } 

  method Main(x: Node)
    requires x != null;
    requires x.list;
  {
    var e := new C;
    fork Putter(e, x);
    fork Getter(e);
  }  
}