aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
path: root/src/test/java/com/google/devtools
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test/java/com/google/devtools')
-rw-r--r--src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/analysis/BuildViewTest.java26
-rw-r--r--src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/analysis/DependencyResolverTest.java16
-rw-r--r--src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/analysis/util/AnalysisTestCase.java34
-rw-r--r--src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/analysis/util/BuildViewTestCase.java62
-rw-r--r--src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/analysis/util/ExpectedTrimmedConfigurationErrors.java (renamed from src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/analysis/util/ExpectedDynamicConfigurationErrors.java)12
-rw-r--r--src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/rules/config/ConfigFeatureFlagTest.java2
-rw-r--r--src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/skyframe/ConfigurationsForTargetsTest.java55
-rw-r--r--src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/skyframe/ConfigurationsForTargetsWithTrimmedConfigurationsTest.java (renamed from src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/skyframe/ConfigurationsForTargetsWithDynamicConfigurationsTest.java)8
8 files changed, 74 insertions, 141 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/analysis/BuildViewTest.java b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/analysis/BuildViewTest.java
index 00130f8282..1a7e353385 100644
--- a/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/analysis/BuildViewTest.java
+++ b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/analysis/BuildViewTest.java
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.BuildView.AnalysisResult;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.config.BuildConfiguration;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.config.InvalidConfigurationException;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.util.BuildViewTestBase;
-import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.util.ExpectedDynamicConfigurationErrors;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.util.ExpectedTrimmedConfigurationErrors;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.util.MockRule;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.cmdline.Label;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.Attribute;
@@ -527,10 +527,9 @@ public class BuildViewTest extends BuildViewTestBase {
assertContainsEvent("and referenced by '//foo:bad'");
assertContainsEvent("in sh_library rule //foo");
assertContainsEvent("cycle in dependency graph");
- // Dynamic configurations trigger this error both in configuration trimming (which visits
- // the transitive target closure) and in the normal configured target cycle detection path.
- // So we get an additional instance of this check (which varies depending on whether Skyframe
- // loading phase is enabled).
+ // This error is triggered both in configuration trimming (which visits the transitive target
+ // closure) and in the normal configured target cycle detection path. So we get an additional
+ // instance of this check (which varies depending on whether Skyframe loading phase is enabled).
// TODO(gregce): Fix above and uncomment the below. Note that the duplicate doesn't make it into
// real user output (it only affects tests).
// assertEventCount(3, eventCollector);
@@ -924,10 +923,9 @@ public class BuildViewTest extends BuildViewTestBase {
@Test
public void testCycleDueToJavaLauncherConfiguration() throws Exception {
- if (defaultFlags().contains(Flag.DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATIONS)) {
- // Dynamic configurations don't yet support late-bound attributes. Development testing already
- // runs all tests with dynamic configurations enabled, so this will still fail for developers
- // and won't get lost in the fog.
+ if (defaultFlags().contains(Flag.TRIMMED_CONFIGURATIONS)) {
+ // Trimmed configurations don't yet support late-bound attributes.
+ // TODO(gregce): re-enable this when ready.
return;
}
scratch.file("foo/BUILD",
@@ -936,7 +934,7 @@ public class BuildViewTest extends BuildViewTestBase {
// Everything is fine - the dependency graph is acyclic.
update("//foo:java", "//foo:cpp");
if (getTargetConfiguration().trimConfigurations()) {
- fail(ExpectedDynamicConfigurationErrors.LATE_BOUND_ATTRIBUTES_UNSUPPORTED);
+ fail(ExpectedTrimmedConfigurationErrors.LATE_BOUND_ATTRIBUTES_UNSUPPORTED);
}
// Now there will be an analysis-phase cycle because the java_binary now has an implicit dep on
// the cc_binary launcher.
@@ -1231,7 +1229,7 @@ public class BuildViewTest extends BuildViewTestBase {
}
@Test
- public void testTopLevelTargetsAreTrimmedWithDynamicConfigurations() throws Exception {
+ public void testTopLevelTargetsAreTrimmedWithTrimmedConfigurations() throws Exception {
scratch.file("foo/BUILD",
"sh_library(name='x', ",
" srcs=['x.sh'])");
@@ -1389,13 +1387,13 @@ public class BuildViewTest extends BuildViewTestBase {
}
}
- /** Runs the same test with dynamic configurations. */
+ /** Runs the same test with trimmed configurations. */
@TestSpec(size = Suite.SMALL_TESTS)
@RunWith(JUnit4.class)
- public static class WithDynamicConfigurations extends BuildViewTest {
+ public static class WithTrimmedConfigurations extends BuildViewTest {
@Override
protected FlagBuilder defaultFlags() {
- return super.defaultFlags().with(Flag.DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATIONS);
+ return super.defaultFlags().with(Flag.TRIMMED_CONFIGURATIONS);
}
}
}
diff --git a/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/analysis/DependencyResolverTest.java b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/analysis/DependencyResolverTest.java
index af37c8b78f..11e04e9537 100644
--- a/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/analysis/DependencyResolverTest.java
+++ b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/analysis/DependencyResolverTest.java
@@ -205,23 +205,13 @@ public class DependencyResolverTest extends AnalysisTestCase {
assertThat(dep.getConfiguration()).isNull();
}
- /** Runs the same test with trimmed dynamic configurations. */
+ /** Runs the same test with trimmed configurations. */
@TestSpec(size = Suite.SMALL_TESTS)
@RunWith(JUnit4.class)
- public static class WithDynamicConfigurations extends DependencyResolverTest {
+ public static class WithTrimmedConfigurations extends DependencyResolverTest {
@Override
protected FlagBuilder defaultFlags() {
- return super.defaultFlags().with(Flag.DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATIONS);
- }
- }
-
- /** Runs the same test with untrimmed dynamic configurations. */
- @TestSpec(size = Suite.SMALL_TESTS)
- @RunWith(JUnit4.class)
- public static class WithDynamicConfigurationsNoTrim extends DependencyResolverTest {
- @Override
- protected FlagBuilder defaultFlags() {
- return super.defaultFlags().with(Flag.DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATIONS_NOTRIM);
+ return super.defaultFlags().with(Flag.TRIMMED_CONFIGURATIONS);
}
}
}
diff --git a/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/analysis/util/AnalysisTestCase.java b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/analysis/util/AnalysisTestCase.java
index 2235d0bb8b..0cdc4a3975 100644
--- a/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/analysis/util/AnalysisTestCase.java
+++ b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/analysis/util/AnalysisTestCase.java
@@ -96,10 +96,8 @@ public abstract class AnalysisTestCase extends FoundationTestCase {
public enum Flag {
KEEP_GOING,
SKYFRAME_LOADING_PHASE,
- // Dynamic configurations that only include the fragments a target needs to properly analyze.
- DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATIONS,
- // Dynamic configurations that always include all fragments even when targets don't need them.
- DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATIONS_NOTRIM
+ // Configurations that only include the fragments a target needs to properly analyze.
+ TRIMMED_CONFIGURATIONS
}
/** Helper class to make it easy to enable and disable flags. */
@@ -227,10 +225,8 @@ public abstract class AnalysisTestCase extends FoundationTestCase {
ruleClassProvider.getConfigurationOptions()));
optionsParser.parse(new String[] {"--default_visibility=public" });
optionsParser.parse(args);
- if (defaultFlags().contains(Flag.DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATIONS)) {
+ if (defaultFlags().contains(Flag.TRIMMED_CONFIGURATIONS)) {
optionsParser.parse("--experimental_dynamic_configs=on");
- } else if (defaultFlags().contains(Flag.DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATIONS_NOTRIM)) {
- optionsParser.parse("--experimental_dynamic_configs=notrim");
}
InvocationPolicyEnforcer optionsPolicyEnforcer = analysisMock.getInvocationPolicyEnforcer();
@@ -264,30 +260,10 @@ public abstract class AnalysisTestCase extends FoundationTestCase {
/**
* Returns the target configuration for the most recent build, as created in Blaze's
- * master configuration creation phase. Most significantly, this is never a dynamic
- * configuration.
+ * master configuration creation phase.
*/
protected BuildConfiguration getTargetConfiguration() throws InterruptedException {
- return getTargetConfiguration(false);
- }
-
- /**
- * Returns the target configuration for the most recent build. If useDynamicVersionIfEnabled is
- * true and dynamic configurations are enabled, returns the dynamic version. Else returns the
- * static version.
- */
- // TODO(gregce): force getTargetConfiguration() to getTargetConfiguration(true) once we know
- // all callers can handle the dynamic version
- protected BuildConfiguration getTargetConfiguration(boolean useDynamicVersionIfEnabled)
- throws InterruptedException {
- BuildConfiguration targetConfig =
- Iterables.getOnlyElement(masterConfig.getTargetConfigurations());
- if (useDynamicVersionIfEnabled) {
- return skyframeExecutor.getConfigurationForTesting(
- reporter, targetConfig.fragmentClasses(), targetConfig.getOptions());
- } else {
- return targetConfig;
- }
+ return Iterables.getOnlyElement(masterConfig.getTargetConfigurations());
}
protected BuildConfiguration getHostConfiguration() {
diff --git a/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/analysis/util/BuildViewTestCase.java b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/analysis/util/BuildViewTestCase.java
index 7c9fea4311..3d0b1d2317 100644
--- a/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/analysis/util/BuildViewTestCase.java
+++ b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/analysis/util/BuildViewTestCase.java
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.actions.SymlinkTreeAction;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.buildinfo.BuildInfoFactory.BuildInfoKey;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.config.BinTools;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.config.BuildConfiguration;
-import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.config.BuildConfiguration.Options.DynamicConfigsMode;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.config.BuildConfiguration.Options.ConfigsMode;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.config.BuildConfigurationCollection;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.config.BuildOptions;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.config.PatchTransition;
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ public abstract class BuildViewTestCase extends FoundationTestCase {
protected BuildConfigurationCollection masterConfig;
protected BuildConfiguration targetConfig; // "target" or "build" config
private List<String> configurationArgs;
- private DynamicConfigsMode dynamicConfigsMode = DynamicConfigsMode.NOTRIM;
+ private ConfigsMode configsMode = ConfigsMode.NOTRIM;
protected OptionsParser optionsParser;
private PackageCacheOptions packageCacheOptions;
@@ -414,12 +414,12 @@ public abstract class BuildViewTestCase extends FoundationTestCase {
ModifiedFileSet.EVERYTHING_MODIFIED, rootDirectory);
if (alsoConfigs) {
try {
- // Also invalidate all configurations. This is important for dynamic configurations: by
- // invalidating all files we invalidate CROSSTOOL, which invalidates CppConfiguration (and
- // a few other fragments). So we need to invalidate the
- // {@link SkyframeBuildView#hostConfigurationCache} as well. Otherwise we end up
- // with old CppConfiguration instances. Even though they're logically equal to the new ones,
- // CppConfiguration has no .equals() method and some production code expects equality.
+ // Also invalidate all configurations. This is important: by invalidating all files we
+ // invalidate CROSSTOOL, which invalidates CppConfiguration (and a few other fragments). So
+ // we need to invalidate the {@link SkyframeBuildView#hostConfigurationCache} as well.
+ // Otherwise we end up with old CppConfiguration instances. Even though they're logically
+ // equal to the new ones, CppConfiguration has no .equals() method and some production code
+ // expects equality.
useConfiguration(configurationArgs.toArray(new String[0]));
} catch (Exception e) {
// There are enough dependers on this method that don't handle Exception that just passing
@@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ public abstract class BuildViewTestCase extends FoundationTestCase {
String[] actualArgs;
actualArgs = Arrays.copyOf(args, args.length + 1);
actualArgs[args.length] = "--experimental_dynamic_configs="
- + dynamicConfigsMode.toString().toLowerCase();
+ + configsMode.toString().toLowerCase();
masterConfig = createConfigurations(actualArgs);
targetConfig = getTargetConfiguration();
configurationArgs = Arrays.asList(actualArgs);
@@ -449,11 +449,11 @@ public abstract class BuildViewTestCase extends FoundationTestCase {
}
/**
- * Makes subsequent {@link #useConfiguration} calls automatically enable dynamic configurations
- * in the specified mode.
+ * Makes subsequent {@link #useConfiguration} calls automatically use the specified style for
+ * configurations.
*/
- protected final void useDynamicConfigurations(DynamicConfigsMode mode) {
- dynamicConfigsMode = mode;
+ protected final void useConfigurationMode(ConfigsMode mode) {
+ configsMode = mode;
}
/**
@@ -510,33 +510,6 @@ public abstract class BuildViewTestCase extends FoundationTestCase {
}
/**
- * Asserts that a target's prerequisites contain the given dependency.
- */
- // TODO(bazel-team): replace this method with assertThat(iterable).contains(target).
- // That doesn't work now because dynamic configurations aren't yet applied to top-level targets.
- // This means that getConfiguredTarget("//go:two") returns a different configuration than
- // requesting "//go:two" as a dependency. So the configured targets aren't considered "equal".
- // Once we apply dynamic configs to top-level targets this discrepancy will go away.
- protected void assertDirectPrerequisitesContain(ConfiguredTarget target, ConfiguredTarget dep)
- throws Exception {
- Iterable<ConfiguredTarget> prereqs = getDirectPrerequisites(target);
- BuildConfiguration depConfig = dep.getConfiguration();
- for (ConfiguredTarget contained : prereqs) {
- if (contained.getLabel().equals(dep.getLabel())) {
- BuildConfiguration containedConfig = contained.getConfiguration();
- if (containedConfig == null && depConfig == null) {
- return;
- } else if (containedConfig != null
- && depConfig != null
- && containedConfig.cloneOptions().equals(depConfig.cloneOptions())) {
- return;
- }
- }
- }
- fail("Cannot find " + target.toString() + " in " + prereqs.toString());
- }
-
- /**
* Asserts that two configurations are the same.
*
* <p>Historically this meant they contained the same object reference. But with upcoming dynamic
@@ -1154,12 +1127,12 @@ public abstract class BuildViewTestCase extends FoundationTestCase {
}
/**
- * Strips the C++-contributed prefix out of an output path when tests are run with dynamic
+ * Strips the C++-contributed prefix out of an output path when tests are run with trimmed
* configurations. e.g. turns "bazel-out/gcc-X-glibc-Y-k8-fastbuild/ to "bazel-out/fastbuild/".
*
* <p>This should be used for targets use configurations with C++ fragments.
*/
- protected String stripCppPrefixForDynamicConfigs(String outputPath) {
+ protected String stripCppPrefixForTrimmedConfigs(String outputPath) {
return targetConfig.trimConfigurations()
? AnalysisTestUtil.OUTPUT_PATH_CPP_PREFIX_PATTERN.matcher(outputPath).replaceFirst("")
: outputPath;
@@ -1302,7 +1275,7 @@ public abstract class BuildViewTestCase extends FoundationTestCase {
BuildConfiguration config;
try {
config = getConfiguredTarget(label).getConfiguration();
- config = view.getDynamicConfigurationForTesting(getTarget(label), config, reporter);
+ config = view.getConfigurationForTesting(getTarget(label), config, reporter);
} catch (LabelSyntaxException e) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(e);
} catch (Exception e) {
@@ -1497,8 +1470,7 @@ public abstract class BuildViewTestCase extends FoundationTestCase {
}
/**
- * Returns the configuration created by applying the given transition to the source
- * configuration. Works for both static and dynamic configuration tests.
+ * Returns the configuration created by applying the given transition to the source configuration.
*/
protected BuildConfiguration getConfiguration(BuildConfiguration fromConfig,
Attribute.Transition transition) throws InterruptedException {
diff --git a/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/analysis/util/ExpectedDynamicConfigurationErrors.java b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/analysis/util/ExpectedTrimmedConfigurationErrors.java
index fb9fecf174..ca1c0bb5e6 100644
--- a/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/analysis/util/ExpectedDynamicConfigurationErrors.java
+++ b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/analysis/util/ExpectedTrimmedConfigurationErrors.java
@@ -14,12 +14,16 @@
package com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.util;
/**
- * Reference point for expected test failures when dynamic configurations are enabled.
+ * Reference point for expected test failures when trimmed configurations are enabled.
*
- * <p>Every Bazel test should either succeed with --experimental_dynamic_configs or
+ * <p>Every Bazel test should either succeed with --experimental_dynamic_configs=on or
* fail with a clear reason due to known features gaps.
*/
-public class ExpectedDynamicConfigurationErrors {
+public class ExpectedTrimmedConfigurationErrors {
public static final String LATE_BOUND_ATTRIBUTES_UNSUPPORTED =
- "dynamic configurations don't yet support fragments from late-bound dependencies";
+ "trimmed configurations don't yet support fragments from late-bound dependencies";
+
+ public static final String MAKE_VARIABLE_FRAGMENTS_UNSUPPORTED =
+ "Trimmed configurations don't yet support fragments required by make variables. See "
+ + "b/25768144";
}
diff --git a/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/rules/config/ConfigFeatureFlagTest.java b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/rules/config/ConfigFeatureFlagTest.java
index fbe81326ea..a856424046 100644
--- a/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/rules/config/ConfigFeatureFlagTest.java
+++ b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/rules/config/ConfigFeatureFlagTest.java
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ import org.junit.runners.JUnit4;
public final class ConfigFeatureFlagTest extends SkylarkTestCase {
@Before
- public void useDynamicConfigurations() throws Exception {
+ public void useTrimmedConfigurations() throws Exception {
useConfiguration("--experimental_dynamic_configs=on");
}
diff --git a/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/skyframe/ConfigurationsForTargetsTest.java b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/skyframe/ConfigurationsForTargetsTest.java
index 10ad309133..edba22433d 100644
--- a/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/skyframe/ConfigurationsForTargetsTest.java
+++ b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/skyframe/ConfigurationsForTargetsTest.java
@@ -290,39 +290,32 @@ public class ConfigurationsForTargetsTest extends AnalysisTestCase {
assertThat(toolDep.getConfiguration().isHostConfiguration()).isTrue();
}
- /** Runs the same test with untrimmed dynamic configurations. */
- @TestSpec(size = Suite.SMALL_TESTS)
- @RunWith(JUnit4.class)
- public static class WithDynamicConfigurationsNoTrim extends ConfigurationsForTargetsTest {
- @Override
- protected FlagBuilder defaultFlags() {
- return super.defaultFlags().with(Flag.DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATIONS_NOTRIM);
- }
-
+ @Test
+ public void splitDeps() throws Exception {
// This test does not pass with trimming because android_binary applies an aspect and aspects
// are not yet correctly supported with trimming.
- @Test
- public void splitDeps() throws Exception {
- scratch.file(
- "java/a/BUILD",
- "cc_library(name = 'lib', srcs = ['lib.cc'])",
- "android_binary(name='a', manifest = 'AndroidManifest.xml', deps = [':lib'])");
- useConfiguration("--fat_apk_cpu=k8,armeabi-v7a");
- List<ConfiguredTarget> deps = getConfiguredDeps("//java/a:a", "deps");
- assertThat(deps).hasSize(2);
- ConfiguredTarget dep1 = deps.get(0);
- ConfiguredTarget dep2 = deps.get(1);
- assertThat(
- ImmutableList.<String>of(
- dep1.getConfiguration().getCpu(),
- dep2.getConfiguration().getCpu()))
- .containsExactly("armeabi-v7a", "k8");
- // We don't care what order split deps are listed, but it must be deterministic.
- assertThat(
- ConfiguredTargetFunction.DYNAMIC_SPLIT_DEP_ORDERING.compare(
- Dependency.withConfiguration(dep1.getLabel(), dep1.getConfiguration()),
- Dependency.withConfiguration(dep2.getLabel(), dep2.getConfiguration())))
- .isLessThan(0);
+ if (defaultFlags().contains(Flag.TRIMMED_CONFIGURATIONS)) {
+ return;
}
+ scratch.file(
+ "java/a/BUILD",
+ "cc_library(name = 'lib', srcs = ['lib.cc'])",
+ "android_binary(name='a', manifest = 'AndroidManifest.xml', deps = [':lib'])");
+ useConfiguration("--fat_apk_cpu=k8,armeabi-v7a");
+ List<ConfiguredTarget> deps = getConfiguredDeps("//java/a:a", "deps");
+ assertThat(deps).hasSize(2);
+ ConfiguredTarget dep1 = deps.get(0);
+ ConfiguredTarget dep2 = deps.get(1);
+ assertThat(
+ ImmutableList.<String>of(
+ dep1.getConfiguration().getCpu(),
+ dep2.getConfiguration().getCpu()))
+ .containsExactly("armeabi-v7a", "k8");
+ // We don't care what order split deps are listed, but it must be deterministic.
+ assertThat(
+ ConfiguredTargetFunction.DYNAMIC_SPLIT_DEP_ORDERING.compare(
+ Dependency.withConfiguration(dep1.getLabel(), dep1.getConfiguration()),
+ Dependency.withConfiguration(dep2.getLabel(), dep2.getConfiguration())))
+ .isLessThan(0);
}
}
diff --git a/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/skyframe/ConfigurationsForTargetsWithDynamicConfigurationsTest.java b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/skyframe/ConfigurationsForTargetsWithTrimmedConfigurationsTest.java
index 54d8e55d02..d398c10427 100644
--- a/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/skyframe/ConfigurationsForTargetsWithDynamicConfigurationsTest.java
+++ b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/skyframe/ConfigurationsForTargetsWithTrimmedConfigurationsTest.java
@@ -52,10 +52,10 @@ import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.junit.runners.JUnit4;
-/** Runs an expanded set of ConfigurationsForTargetsTest with trimmed dynamic configurations. */
+/** Runs an expanded set of ConfigurationsForTargetsTest with trimmed configurations. */
@TestSpec(size = Suite.SMALL_TESTS)
@RunWith(JUnit4.class)
-public class ConfigurationsForTargetsWithDynamicConfigurationsTest
+public class ConfigurationsForTargetsWithTrimmedConfigurationsTest
extends ConfigurationsForTargetsTest {
private ConfigurationResolver configResolver;
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ public class ConfigurationsForTargetsWithDynamicConfigurationsTest
@Override
protected FlagBuilder defaultFlags() {
- return super.defaultFlags().with(Flag.DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATIONS);
+ return super.defaultFlags().with(Flag.TRIMMED_CONFIGURATIONS);
}
private static class EmptySplitTransition implements SplitTransition<BuildOptions> {
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ public class ConfigurationsForTargetsWithDynamicConfigurationsTest
ConfiguredTarget target = getView().getConfiguredTargetForTesting(
reporter,
Label.parseAbsoluteUnchecked("@//a:factory"),
- getTargetConfiguration(true));
+ getTargetConfiguration());
assertThat(target.getConfiguration().getFragment(TestConfiguration.class).getTestFilter())
.isEqualTo("SET ON COMMAND LINE: original and best");
}