aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
path: root/src
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGravatar ajmichael <ajmichael@google.com>2017-10-30 11:57:46 -0400
committerGravatar John Cater <jcater@google.com>2017-10-31 10:36:54 -0400
commit5df4759783be1bf6ef54754171e34732aa77d7ba (patch)
treea7cc2f21f10d6d80676936f818be92475e09b58f /src
parentfadeb90a05321195a969ae526ee8cbfea5db6cc6 (diff)
Make AndroidRuleClasses#hasProguardSpecs less fragile.
Keeps the semantics the same. RELNOTES: None PiperOrigin-RevId: 173899927
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
-rw-r--r--src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/rules/android/AndroidRuleClasses.java15
-rw-r--r--src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/rules/android/AndroidBinaryTest.java58
2 files changed, 62 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/rules/android/AndroidRuleClasses.java b/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/rules/android/AndroidRuleClasses.java
index d3231d101e..c832717eb5 100644
--- a/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/rules/android/AndroidRuleClasses.java
+++ b/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/rules/android/AndroidRuleClasses.java
@@ -321,9 +321,10 @@ public final class AndroidRuleClasses {
public static boolean hasProguardSpecs(AttributeMap rule) {
// The below is a hack to support configurable attributes (proguard_specs seems like
// too valuable an attribute to make nonconfigurable, and we don't currently
- // have the ability to know the configuration when determining implicit outputs).
- // An IllegalArgumentException gets triggered if the attribute instance is configurable.
- // We assume, heuristically, that means every configurable value is a non-empty list.
+ // have the ability to know the configuration when determining implicit outputs). So if the
+ // attribute is configurable, we create the proguard implicit output. At analysis time, we know
+ // the actual value of proguard_specs, and if it is empty we do not use the proguarded jar for
+ // dexing. If the user explicitly tries to build the proguard jar, it will fail.
//
// TODO(bazel-team): find a stronger approach for this. One simple approach is to somehow
// receive 'rule' as an AggregatingAttributeMapper instead of a RawAttributeMapper,
@@ -332,12 +333,8 @@ public final class AndroidRuleClasses {
// to somehow determine implicit outputs after the configuration is known. A third
// approach is to refactor the Android rule logic to avoid these dependencies in the
// first place.
- try {
- return !rule.get("proguard_specs", LABEL_LIST).isEmpty();
- } catch (IllegalArgumentException e) {
- // We assume at this point the attribute instance is configurable.
- return true;
- }
+ return rule.isConfigurable("proguard_specs")
+ || !rule.get("proguard_specs", LABEL_LIST).isEmpty();
}
public static final SafeImplicitOutputsFunction ANDROID_BINARY_IMPLICIT_OUTPUTS =
diff --git a/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/rules/android/AndroidBinaryTest.java b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/rules/android/AndroidBinaryTest.java
index 8793c07a57..a9d892c79f 100644
--- a/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/rules/android/AndroidBinaryTest.java
+++ b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/rules/android/AndroidBinaryTest.java
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
// limitations under the License.
package com.google.devtools.build.lib.rules.android;
+import static com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList.toImmutableList;
import static com.google.common.collect.Iterables.getOnlyElement;
import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertThat;
import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertWithMessage;
@@ -40,6 +41,8 @@ import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.actions.SpawnAction;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.cmdline.RepositoryName;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.collect.nestedset.NestedSet;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.BuildType;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.FileTarget;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.Rule;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.util.BazelMockAndroidSupport;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.rules.android.AndroidRuleClasses.MultidexMode;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.rules.android.deployinfo.AndroidDeployInfoOuterClass.AndroidDeployInfo;
@@ -2330,17 +2333,24 @@ public class AndroidBinaryTest extends AndroidBuildViewTestCase {
// regression test for b/14288948
@Test
public void testEmptyListAsProguardSpec() throws Exception {
- scratchConfiguredTarget("java/foo", "abin",
+ scratch.file(
+ "java/foo/BUILD",
"android_binary(",
" name = 'abin',",
" srcs = ['a.java'],",
" proguard_specs = [],",
" manifest = 'AndroidManifest.xml')");
+ Rule rule = getTarget("//java/foo:abin").getAssociatedRule();
+ assertNoEvents();
+ ImmutableList<String> implicitOutputFilenames =
+ rule.getOutputFiles().stream().map(FileTarget::getName).collect(toImmutableList());
+ assertThat(implicitOutputFilenames).doesNotContain("abin_proguard.jar");
}
@Test
public void testConfigurableProguardSpecsEmptyList() throws Exception {
- scratchConfiguredTarget("java/foo", "abin",
+ scratch.file(
+ "java/foo/BUILD",
"android_binary(",
" name = 'abin',",
" srcs = ['a.java'],",
@@ -2348,7 +2358,11 @@ public class AndroidBinaryTest extends AndroidBuildViewTestCase {
" '" + BuildType.Selector.DEFAULT_CONDITION_KEY + "': [],",
" }),",
" manifest = 'AndroidManifest.xml')");
+ Rule rule = getTarget("//java/foo:abin").getAssociatedRule();
assertNoEvents();
+ ImmutableList<String> implicitOutputFilenames =
+ rule.getOutputFiles().stream().map(FileTarget::getName).collect(toImmutableList());
+ assertThat(implicitOutputFilenames).contains("abin_proguard.jar");
}
@Test
@@ -3810,4 +3824,44 @@ public class AndroidBinaryTest extends AndroidBuildViewTestCase {
AndroidInstrumentationInfo provider = b1.get(AndroidInstrumentationInfo.PROVIDER);
assertThat(provider).isNull();
}
+
+ /**
+ * 'proguard_specs' attribute gets read by an implicit outputs function: the
+ * current heuristic is that if this attribute is configurable, we assume its
+ * contents are non-empty and thus create the mybinary_proguard.jar output.
+ * Test that here.
+ */
+ @Test
+ public void testConfigurableProguardSpecs() throws Exception {
+ scratch.file("conditions/BUILD",
+ "config_setting(",
+ " name = 'a',",
+ " values = {'test_arg': 'a'})",
+ "config_setting(",
+ " name = 'b',",
+ " values = {'test_arg': 'b'})");
+ scratchConfiguredTarget("java/foo", "abin",
+ "android_binary(",
+ " name = 'abin',",
+ " srcs = ['a.java'],",
+ " proguard_specs = select({",
+ " '//conditions:a': [':file1.pro'],",
+ " '//conditions:b': [],",
+ " '//conditions:default': [':file3.pro'],",
+ " }) + [",
+ // Add a long list here as a regression test for b/68238721
+ " 'file4.pro',",
+ " 'file5.pro',",
+ " 'file6.pro',",
+ " 'file7.pro',",
+ " 'file8.pro',",
+ " ],",
+ " manifest = 'AndroidManifest.xml')");
+ checkProguardUse(
+ "//java/foo:abin",
+ "abin_proguard.jar",
+ /*expectMapping=*/ false,
+ /*passes=*/ null,
+ getAndroidJarPath());
+ }
}