aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
path: root/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/skyframe/ConfigurationFragmentValue.java
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGravatar Greg Estren <gregce@google.com>2016-02-01 22:46:10 +0000
committerGravatar Damien Martin-Guillerez <dmarting@google.com>2016-02-02 14:57:47 +0000
commita0eccb7441dfc7a3bcb6ef2e384cd1f63b9b03cb (patch)
tree88bd211285bb2793fd29bcab8ee381df2a1ffa15 /src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/skyframe/ConfigurationFragmentValue.java
parentcb0d65f2095f4998cd8905f1edca714e736a45d3 (diff)
Trim the BuildOptions input of ConfigurationFragment.key to only those
options actually needed by the fragment. This protects against, e.g., unnecessarily duplicating CppConfiguration instances when only Java flags change. This is a recommit of ca1b21ac6d8a58041db822725b42de151b163dee which was rolled back because it broke LIPO. This change is particularly important for dynamic configurations, which may mix and match fragments arbitrarily throughout a build. This not only has performance implications, but also correctness implications: code that expects two configured targets to have the same fragment (value) shouldn't break just because the second CT's configuration is a trimmed version of the first's. The original change breaks FDO/LIPO because CppConfiguration can't be shared across configurations. That's because it mutates state when prepareHook() is called, and each configuration calls prepareHook. We should ultimately solve this by refactoring the FDO/LIPO implementation but don't want to block dynamic configuration progress on that. So this change only enables trimming for dynamic configurations. -- MOS_MIGRATED_REVID=113570250
Diffstat (limited to 'src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/skyframe/ConfigurationFragmentValue.java')
-rw-r--r--src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/skyframe/ConfigurationFragmentValue.java38
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/skyframe/ConfigurationFragmentValue.java b/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/skyframe/ConfigurationFragmentValue.java
index bebc76a100..1f72d00501 100644
--- a/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/skyframe/ConfigurationFragmentValue.java
+++ b/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/skyframe/ConfigurationFragmentValue.java
@@ -14,11 +14,13 @@
package com.google.devtools.build.lib.skyframe;
+import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.config.BuildConfiguration;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.config.BuildConfiguration.Fragment;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.config.BuildOptions;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.concurrent.ThreadSafety.Immutable;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.concurrent.ThreadSafety.ThreadSafe;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.RuleClassProvider;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.util.Preconditions;
import com.google.devtools.build.skyframe.SkyKey;
import com.google.devtools.build.skyframe.SkyValue;
@@ -34,7 +36,7 @@ import javax.annotation.Nullable;
@Immutable
@ThreadSafe
public class ConfigurationFragmentValue implements SkyValue {
-
+
@Nullable
private final BuildConfiguration.Fragment fragment;
@@ -45,31 +47,47 @@ public class ConfigurationFragmentValue implements SkyValue {
public BuildConfiguration.Fragment getFragment() {
return fragment;
}
-
+
@ThreadSafe
- public static SkyKey key(BuildOptions buildOptions, Class<? extends Fragment> fragmentType) {
+ public static SkyKey key(BuildOptions buildOptions, Class<? extends Fragment> fragmentType,
+ RuleClassProvider ruleClassProvider) {
+ // For dynamic configurations, trim the options down to just those used by this fragment.
+ // This ensures we don't end up with different Skyframe keys due to trimming of unrelated
+ // options.
+ //
+ // We don't trim for static configurations because static configurations need to support
+ // LIPO and trimming breaks LIPO: it results in CppConfiguration instances being shared
+ // across configurations. That isn't safe because CppConfiguration mutates its state
+ // in prepareHook() for each configuration.
+ BuildOptions optionsKey =
+ buildOptions.get(BuildConfiguration.Options.class).useDynamicConfigurations
+ ? buildOptions.trim(
+ BuildConfiguration.getOptionsClasses(
+ ImmutableList.<Class<? extends BuildConfiguration.Fragment>>of(fragmentType),
+ ruleClassProvider))
+ : buildOptions;
return new SkyKey(SkyFunctions.CONFIGURATION_FRAGMENT,
- new ConfigurationFragmentKey(buildOptions, fragmentType));
+ new ConfigurationFragmentKey(optionsKey, fragmentType));
}
-
+
static final class ConfigurationFragmentKey implements Serializable {
private final BuildOptions buildOptions;
private final Class<? extends Fragment> fragmentType;
-
+
public ConfigurationFragmentKey(BuildOptions buildOptions,
Class<? extends Fragment> fragmentType) {
this.buildOptions = Preconditions.checkNotNull(buildOptions);
- this.fragmentType = Preconditions.checkNotNull(fragmentType);
+ this.fragmentType = Preconditions.checkNotNull(fragmentType);
}
-
+
public BuildOptions getBuildOptions() {
return buildOptions;
}
-
+
public Class<? extends Fragment> getFragmentType() {
return fragmentType;
}
-
+
@Override
public boolean equals(Object o) {
if (this == o) {