diff options
author | 2017-09-15 15:59:14 +0200 | |
---|---|---|
committer | 2017-09-18 11:25:37 +0200 | |
commit | 394211bf88b88c25036429e99894fa7c60eaaace (patch) | |
tree | a5a99354a9f3b8530bb0d98d61d8844b21348ecd /src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/rules/cpp/CcLibrary.java | |
parent | f8480fac37692083b2f9c4e69b9b9e9e2c9b1853 (diff) |
Bazel now can build dynamic library from cc_library
Working towards: https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/issues/3311
When building dynamic library on Windows, Bazel builds an import library
and a DLL.
Bazel provides a feature called windows_export_all_symbols, if this
feature is enabled(and no_windows_export_all_symbols is not) for a
cc_library, then Bazel parses object files of that cc_library to generate
a DEF file that will be used during linking time to export symbols from
DLL. This feature can be specified at crosstool, package, target and
command line level.
A few differences from Unix platforms:
1. We don't build the shared library on Windows by default, users have to
specifiy --output_groups=dynamic_library for building dynamic libraries.
This output group is also available on other platforms.
2. By default, cc_test is dynamically linked on Unix, but it will be
statically linked on Windows by default. (meaning the default value of
linkstatic in cc_test is 1 on Windows, and 0 on other platforms)
3. For global data symbols, __declspec(dllimport) must still be used in
source files.
Remaining issues:
1. Extensions for import library and DLL are not correct yet.
2. DLLs are not guaranteed to be available during runtime yet.
3. Diamond problem
If a cc_library A is specified as linkstatic=0, then no dynamic library
will be built for it, so if another cc_library B depends on it, A will
be statically linked into B, and if a cc_binary C depends on B, A will
also be statically linked into C and B will be dynamically linked to C.
This is wrong because A is duplicated in both B and C.
It is essentially a diamond problem describled in C++ Transitive Library.
(https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-tv0_79zGyBoDmaP_pYWaBVUwHUteLpAs90_rUl-VY8/edit?usp=sharing)
Hopefully, we can avoid this by using cc_shared_library rule in future.
Change-Id: I23640d4caf8afe65d60b1522af6368536d7a8408
PiperOrigin-RevId: 168829958
Diffstat (limited to 'src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/rules/cpp/CcLibrary.java')
-rw-r--r-- | src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/rules/cpp/CcLibrary.java | 33 |
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/rules/cpp/CcLibrary.java b/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/rules/cpp/CcLibrary.java index b846dfaef3..e90dda7c54 100644 --- a/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/rules/cpp/CcLibrary.java +++ b/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/rules/cpp/CcLibrary.java @@ -187,11 +187,17 @@ public abstract class CcLibrary implements RuleConfiguredTargetFactory { // doesn't support it, then register an action which complains when triggered, // which only happens when some rule explicitly depends on the dynamic library. if (!createDynamicLibrary && !supportsDynamicLinker) { - Artifact solibArtifact = + ImmutableList.Builder<Artifact> dynamicLibraries = ImmutableList.builder(); + dynamicLibraries.add( + CppHelper.getLinuxLinkedArtifact( + ruleContext, ruleContext.getConfiguration(), LinkTargetType.DYNAMIC_LIBRARY)); + if (ccToolchain.getCppConfiguration().useInterfaceSharedObjects()) { + dynamicLibraries.add( CppHelper.getLinuxLinkedArtifact( - ruleContext, ruleContext.getConfiguration(), LinkTargetType.DYNAMIC_LIBRARY); + ruleContext, ruleContext.getConfiguration(), LinkTargetType.INTERFACE_DYNAMIC_LIBRARY)); + } ruleContext.registerAction(new FailAction(ruleContext.getActionOwner(), - ImmutableList.of(solibArtifact), "Toolchain does not support dynamic linking")); + dynamicLibraries.build(), "Toolchain does not support dynamic linking")); } else if (!createDynamicLibrary && ruleContext.attributes().isConfigurable("srcs")) { // If "srcs" is configurable, the .so output is always declared because the logic that @@ -199,11 +205,17 @@ public abstract class CcLibrary implements RuleConfiguredTargetFactory { // Here, where we *do* have the correct value, it may not contain any source files to // generate an .so with. If that's the case, register a fake generating action to prevent // a "no generating action for this artifact" error. - Artifact solibArtifact = + ImmutableList.Builder<Artifact> dynamicLibraries = ImmutableList.builder(); + dynamicLibraries.add( + CppHelper.getLinuxLinkedArtifact( + ruleContext, ruleContext.getConfiguration(), LinkTargetType.DYNAMIC_LIBRARY)); + if (ccToolchain.getCppConfiguration().useInterfaceSharedObjects()) { + dynamicLibraries.add( CppHelper.getLinuxLinkedArtifact( - ruleContext, ruleContext.getConfiguration(), LinkTargetType.DYNAMIC_LIBRARY); + ruleContext, ruleContext.getConfiguration(), LinkTargetType.INTERFACE_DYNAMIC_LIBRARY)); + } ruleContext.registerAction(new FailAction(ruleContext.getActionOwner(), - ImmutableList.of(solibArtifact), "configurable \"srcs\" triggers an implicit .so output " + dynamicLibraries.build(), "configurable \"srcs\" triggers an implicit .so output " + "even though there are no sources to compile in this configuration")); } @@ -258,9 +270,12 @@ public abstract class CcLibrary implements RuleConfiguredTargetFactory { NestedSetBuilder<Artifact> filesBuilder = NestedSetBuilder.stableOrder(); filesBuilder.addAll(LinkerInputs.toLibraryArtifacts(linkedLibraries.getStaticLibraries())); filesBuilder.addAll(LinkerInputs.toLibraryArtifacts(linkedLibraries.getPicStaticLibraries())); - filesBuilder.addAll(LinkerInputs.toNonSolibArtifacts(linkedLibraries.getDynamicLibraries())); - filesBuilder.addAll( - LinkerInputs.toNonSolibArtifacts(linkedLibraries.getExecutionDynamicLibraries())); + + if (!featureConfiguration.isEnabled(CppRuleClasses.TARGETS_WINDOWS)) { + filesBuilder.addAll(LinkerInputs.toNonSolibArtifacts(linkedLibraries.getDynamicLibraries())); + filesBuilder.addAll( + LinkerInputs.toNonSolibArtifacts(linkedLibraries.getExecutionDynamicLibraries())); + } CcLinkingOutputs linkingOutputs = info.getCcLinkingOutputs(); if (!featureConfiguration.isEnabled(CppRuleClasses.HEADER_MODULE_CODEGEN)) { |