Be honest about type in Type#visitLabels

We avoided referencing Label directly, but as the code evolved it became
inevitable.

Also fix a typo I introduced earlier.

--
MOS_MIGRATED_REVID=133831955

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/packages/AbstractAttributeMapper.java b/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/packages/AbstractAttributeMapper.java
index 4f67d959e0..a7b55b22db 100644
--- a/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/packages/AbstractAttributeMapper.java
+++ b/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/packages/AbstractAttributeMapper.java
@@ -155,9 +155,9 @@ public abstract class AbstractAttributeMapper implements AttributeMap {
     if (value != null) { // null values are particularly possible for computed defaults.
       type.visitLabels(new Type.LabelVisitor() {
         @Override
-        public void visit(@Nullable Object object) throws InterruptedException {
-          if (object != null) {
-            Label absoluteLabel = ruleLabel.resolveRepositoryRelative((Label) object);
+        public void visit(@Nullable Label label) throws InterruptedException {
+          if (label != null) {
+            Label absoluteLabel = ruleLabel.resolveRepositoryRelative(label);
             observer.acceptLabelAttribute(absoluteLabel, attribute);
           }
         }