aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
path: root/README.chromium
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGravatar Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>2018-01-29 16:33:14 -0500
committerGravatar Skia Commit-Bot <skia-commit-bot@chromium.org>2018-01-29 23:13:24 +0000
commiteb72ce5c4a47d464023166c3c28c0d90f3c5da35 (patch)
tree00ba4ef39a68181249a27dd3044e9ae99fcad680 /README.chromium
parent3c4c8c8232ff5edd5d0e56e9613aba6d8d06cacf (diff)
Add 32-bit ARMv8 bots
Our 32-bit "arm" builds can run just fine on most ARMv8 devices. This mode of operation is called "aarch32", as opposed to the usual mode we're used to thinking about of running 64-bit "arm64" binaries, "aarch64". (Unimportant side note: there are ARMv8 chips that support only aarch64... I think e.g. the iPhone X's CPU? There are also ARMv8 chips that support only aarch32, rare and usually for tiny embedded things like a watch. All the devices we test with support both aarch64 and aarch32.) (Technically what we call "arm" is more properly "T32" for Thumb2 32, and "arm64" is "A64" for... ARM 64. This note is even less important than the previous one.) Android ships 64-bit Skia on devices that support it, but Chrome still clings to 32-bit. So I thought it'd make sense for us to run some of these Chrome-like builds too. I wasn't sure which ones, so I just went nuts and mirrored all the Nexus5x bots. If you notice bots that seem under your purview and you really don't care about how Chrome would work in that mode, please mark them in the code review and I'll drop them. Change-Id: I3e67070c669f5c459f4c0f5f46a68529a8eb9afc Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/101545 Reviewed-by: Brian Salomon <bsalomon@google.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Daniel <egdaniel@google.com> Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'README.chromium')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions