summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGravatar Jonathan Reed <jdreed@mit.edu>2014-02-10 23:45:46 -0500
committerGravatar Jonathan Reed <jdreed@mit.edu>2014-02-10 23:45:46 -0500
commitcef8ae4df8650dfa93457dc93dc27a1aa5efe51a (patch)
tree2c38623be3e9b65971127ef645a751e5951f9f78
parent49a7ea851834e49c84eeed02405c71bc2fbc9c02 (diff)
Change title to 'principles', update preamble
Incorporate suggestions from tboning and others to change the title to something other than rules, but which still emphasizes that these are important shared beliefs. Incorporate suggestions form achernya and others to remove any negative phrasing from the preamble.
-rw-r--r--code-of-conduct.txt17
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/code-of-conduct.txt b/code-of-conduct.txt
index e529cf4..82a41df 100644
--- a/code-of-conduct.txt
+++ b/code-of-conduct.txt
@@ -1,16 +1,13 @@
-SIPB social rules and expectations
+SIPB Social Principles
Preamble:
-One way we try to remove obstacles to participation is by having a
-small set of social rules. These rules are intended to be lightweight,
-and to make more explicit certain social norms that are normally
-implicit. Most of our social rules really boil down to "don't be a
-jerk" or "don't be annoying." Of course, almost nobody sets out to be
-a jerk or annoying, so telling people not to be jerks isn't a very
-productive strategy. That's why our social rules are designed to
-curtail specific behavior we've found to be destructive to a
-supportive, productive, and fun learning environment.
+The purpose of these principles is to provide guidance and a baseline
+for interpersonal interactions at SIPB, whether in the office, at a
+hackathon, or in an electronic medium. These expectations are focused
+on individual empowerment and making SIPB a supportive, productive,
+and fun learning environment, where people feel comfortable making
+mistakes and learning from them.
No feigning surprise