protobuf - Protocol Buffers – Google’s data interchange format

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age
*	add some test proto2 supported, add js proto2 supported, fixed some error	Yilun Chong	2017-06-30
\|
*	change java to uniform message, revert TestValidDataForType's parameters	Yilun Chong	2017-06-29
\|
*	add java supported	Yilun Chong	2017-06-28
\|
*	Factored Conformance and Benchmark test messages into shared test schema. ↵	Joshua Haberman	2016-12-03
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	(#1971) * Factored Conformance test messages into shared test schema. * Updated benchmarks to use new proto3 message locations. * Fixed include path. * Conformance: fixed include of Python test messages. * Make maven in Rakefile use --batch-mode. * Revert changes to benchmarks. On second thought I think a separate schema for CPU benchmarking makes sense. * Try regenerating C# protos for new test protos. * Removed benchmark messages from test proto. * Added Jon Skeet's fixes for C#. * Removed duplicate/old test messages C# file. * C# fixes for test schema move. * Fixed C# to use the correct TestAllTypes message. * Fixes for Objective C test schema move. * Added missing EXTRA_DIST file.
*	Integrated internal changes from Google	Adam Cozzette	2016-11-17
\|
*	Integrate google internal changes.	Jisi Liu	2016-03-30
\|
*	Down-integrate from internal code base.	Feng Xiao	2015-12-11
\|
*	Added support for Json and valid input to conformance tests.	Josh Haberman	2015-07-10
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	This was enabled by the recent open-sourcing of JSON support and MessageDifferencer. MessageDifferencer allows the conformance suite to expand because it allows us to write tests for payloads that parse successfully. To verify the testee's output payload, we need to parse it back into a message and compare the message instances. Comparing output bytes vs. a golden message is not valid, because protobufs do not have a canonical encoding (especially in the presence of maps, which have no prescribed serialization order). We only add one small JSON test for now, but with the framework in place we now have the foundation to dramatically expand the coverage of the conformance test suite. Also added the ability for the testee to skip tests that exercise features that are unimplemented. This allows Java (which currently has no JSON support) to skip tests involving JSON. Change-Id: I697b4363da432b61ae3b638b4287c4cda1af4deb
*	Added conformance test support for Java.	Josh Haberman	2015-04-16
	Change-Id: I4c81808e6ace77d2b5737a43417045321b0b10f0