aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
path: root/src/google/protobuf/compiler/cpp/cpp_unittest.cc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/google/protobuf/compiler/cpp/cpp_unittest.cc')
-rw-r--r--src/google/protobuf/compiler/cpp/cpp_unittest.cc835
1 files changed, 835 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/google/protobuf/compiler/cpp/cpp_unittest.cc b/src/google/protobuf/compiler/cpp/cpp_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8253242b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/google/protobuf/compiler/cpp/cpp_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,835 @@
+// Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format
+// Copyright 2008 Google Inc.
+// http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/
+//
+// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+// You may obtain a copy of the License at
+//
+// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+//
+// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+// limitations under the License.
+
+// Author: kenton@google.com (Kenton Varda)
+// Based on original Protocol Buffers design by
+// Sanjay Ghemawat, Jeff Dean, and others.
+//
+// To test the code generator, we actually use it to generate code for
+// google/protobuf/unittest.proto, then test that. This means that we
+// are actually testing the parser and other parts of the system at the same
+// time, and that problems in the generator may show up as compile-time errors
+// rather than unittest failures, which may be surprising. However, testing
+// the output of the C++ generator directly would be very hard. We can't very
+// well just check it against golden files since those files would have to be
+// updated for any small change; such a test would be very brittle and probably
+// not very helpful. What we really want to test is that the code compiles
+// correctly and produces the interfaces we expect, which is why this test
+// is written this way.
+
+#include <vector>
+
+#include <google/protobuf/unittest.pb.h>
+#include <google/protobuf/unittest_optimize_for.pb.h>
+#include <google/protobuf/unittest_embed_optimize_for.pb.h>
+#include <google/protobuf/test_util.h>
+#include <google/protobuf/compiler/cpp/cpp_test_bad_identifiers.pb.h>
+#include <google/protobuf/compiler/importer.h>
+#include <google/protobuf/descriptor.h>
+#include <google/protobuf/descriptor.pb.h>
+#include <google/protobuf/dynamic_message.h>
+
+#include <google/protobuf/stubs/common.h>
+#include <google/protobuf/stubs/strutil.h>
+#include <google/protobuf/stubs/substitute.h>
+#include <google/protobuf/testing/googletest.h>
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+
+namespace google {
+namespace protobuf {
+namespace compiler {
+namespace cpp {
+
+namespace {
+
+
+class MockErrorCollector : public MultiFileErrorCollector {
+ public:
+ MockErrorCollector() {}
+ ~MockErrorCollector() {}
+
+ string text_;
+
+ // implements ErrorCollector ---------------------------------------
+ void AddError(const string& filename, int line, int column,
+ const string& message) {
+ strings::SubstituteAndAppend(&text_, "$0:$1:$2: $3\n",
+ filename, line, column, message);
+ }
+};
+
+// Test that generated code has proper descriptors:
+// Parse a descriptor directly (using google::protobuf::compiler::Importer) and
+// compare it to the one that was produced by generated code.
+TEST(GeneratedDescriptorTest, IdenticalDescriptors) {
+ const FileDescriptor* generated_descriptor =
+ unittest::TestAllTypes::descriptor()->file();
+
+ // Set up the Importer.
+ MockErrorCollector error_collector;
+ DiskSourceTree source_tree;
+ source_tree.MapPath("", TestSourceDir());
+ Importer importer(&source_tree, &error_collector);
+
+ // Import (parse) unittest.proto.
+ const FileDescriptor* parsed_descriptor =
+ importer.Import("google/protobuf/unittest.proto");
+ EXPECT_EQ("", error_collector.text_);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(parsed_descriptor != NULL);
+
+ // Test that descriptors are generated correctly by converting them to
+ // FileDescriptorProtos and comparing.
+ FileDescriptorProto generated_decsriptor_proto, parsed_descriptor_proto;
+ generated_descriptor->CopyTo(&generated_decsriptor_proto);
+ parsed_descriptor->CopyTo(&parsed_descriptor_proto);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(parsed_descriptor_proto.DebugString(),
+ generated_decsriptor_proto.DebugString());
+}
+
+// ===================================================================
+
+TEST(GeneratedMessageTest, Defaults) {
+ // Check that all default values are set correctly in the initial message.
+ unittest::TestAllTypes message;
+
+ TestUtil::ExpectClear(message);
+
+ // Messages should return pointers to default instances until first use.
+ // (This is not checked by ExpectClear() since it is not actually true after
+ // the fields have been set and then cleared.)
+ EXPECT_EQ(&unittest::TestAllTypes::OptionalGroup::default_instance(),
+ &message.optionalgroup());
+ EXPECT_EQ(&unittest::TestAllTypes::NestedMessage::default_instance(),
+ &message.optional_nested_message());
+ EXPECT_EQ(&unittest::ForeignMessage::default_instance(),
+ &message.optional_foreign_message());
+ EXPECT_EQ(&unittest_import::ImportMessage::default_instance(),
+ &message.optional_import_message());
+}
+
+TEST(GeneratedMessageTest, Accessors) {
+ // Set every field to a unique value then go back and check all those
+ // values.
+ unittest::TestAllTypes message;
+
+ TestUtil::SetAllFields(&message);
+ TestUtil::ExpectAllFieldsSet(message);
+
+ TestUtil::ModifyRepeatedFields(&message);
+ TestUtil::ExpectRepeatedFieldsModified(message);
+}
+
+TEST(GeneratedMessageTest, MutableStringDefault) {
+ // mutable_foo() for a string should return a string initialized to its
+ // default value.
+ unittest::TestAllTypes message;
+
+ EXPECT_EQ("hello", *message.mutable_default_string());
+
+ // Note that the first time we call mutable_foo(), we get a newly-allocated
+ // string, but if we clear it and call it again, we get the same object again.
+ // We should verify that it has its default value in both cases.
+ message.set_default_string("blah");
+ message.Clear();
+
+ EXPECT_EQ("hello", *message.mutable_default_string());
+}
+
+TEST(GeneratedMessageTest, Clear) {
+ // Set every field to a unique value, clear the message, then check that
+ // it is cleared.
+ unittest::TestAllTypes message;
+
+ TestUtil::SetAllFields(&message);
+ message.Clear();
+ TestUtil::ExpectClear(message);
+
+ // Unlike with the defaults test, we do NOT expect that requesting embedded
+ // messages will return a pointer to the default instance. Instead, they
+ // should return the objects that were created when mutable_blah() was
+ // called.
+ EXPECT_NE(&unittest::TestAllTypes::OptionalGroup::default_instance(),
+ &message.optionalgroup());
+ EXPECT_NE(&unittest::TestAllTypes::NestedMessage::default_instance(),
+ &message.optional_nested_message());
+ EXPECT_NE(&unittest::ForeignMessage::default_instance(),
+ &message.optional_foreign_message());
+ EXPECT_NE(&unittest_import::ImportMessage::default_instance(),
+ &message.optional_import_message());
+}
+
+TEST(GeneratedMessageTest, ClearOneField) {
+ // Set every field to a unique value, then clear one value and insure that
+ // only that one value is cleared.
+ unittest::TestAllTypes message;
+
+ TestUtil::SetAllFields(&message);
+ int64 original_value = message.optional_int64();
+
+ // Clear the field and make sure it shows up as cleared.
+ message.clear_optional_int64();
+ EXPECT_FALSE(message.has_optional_int64());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, message.optional_int64());
+
+ // Other adjacent fields should not be cleared.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(message.has_optional_int32());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(message.has_optional_uint32());
+
+ // Make sure if we set it again, then all fields are set.
+ message.set_optional_int64(original_value);
+ TestUtil::ExpectAllFieldsSet(message);
+}
+
+
+TEST(GeneratedMessageTest, CopyFrom) {
+ unittest::TestAllTypes message1, message2;
+ string data;
+
+ TestUtil::SetAllFields(&message1);
+ message2.CopyFrom(message1);
+ TestUtil::ExpectAllFieldsSet(message2);
+
+ // Copying from self should be a no-op.
+ message2.CopyFrom(message2);
+ TestUtil::ExpectAllFieldsSet(message2);
+}
+
+TEST(GeneratedMessageTest, CopyConstructor) {
+ unittest::TestAllTypes message1;
+ TestUtil::SetAllFields(&message1);
+
+ unittest::TestAllTypes message2(message1);
+ TestUtil::ExpectAllFieldsSet(message2);
+}
+
+TEST(GeneratedMessageTest, CopyAssignmentOperator) {
+ unittest::TestAllTypes message1;
+ TestUtil::SetAllFields(&message1);
+
+ unittest::TestAllTypes message2;
+ message2 = message1;
+ TestUtil::ExpectAllFieldsSet(message2);
+
+ // Make sure that self-assignment does something sane.
+ message2 = message2;
+ TestUtil::ExpectAllFieldsSet(message2);
+}
+
+TEST(GeneratedMessageTest, UpcastCopyFrom) {
+ // Test the CopyFrom method that takes in the generic const Message&
+ // parameter.
+ unittest::TestAllTypes message1, message2;
+
+ TestUtil::SetAllFields(&message1);
+
+ const Message* source = implicit_cast<const Message*>(&message1);
+ message2.CopyFrom(*source);
+
+ TestUtil::ExpectAllFieldsSet(message2);
+}
+
+TEST(GeneratedMessageTest, DynamicMessageCopyFrom) {
+ // Test copying from a DynamicMessage, which must fall back to using
+ // reflection.
+ unittest::TestAllTypes message2;
+
+ // Construct a new version of the dynamic message via the factory.
+ DynamicMessageFactory factory;
+ scoped_ptr<Message> message1;
+ message1.reset(factory.GetPrototype(
+ unittest::TestAllTypes::descriptor())->New());
+
+ TestUtil::ReflectionTester reflection_tester(
+ unittest::TestAllTypes::descriptor());
+ reflection_tester.SetAllFieldsViaReflection(message1->GetReflection());
+
+ message2.CopyFrom(*message1);
+
+ TestUtil::ExpectAllFieldsSet(message2);
+}
+
+TEST(GeneratedMessageTest, NonEmptyMergeFrom) {
+ // Test merging with a non-empty message. Code is a modified form
+ // of that found in google/protobuf/reflection_ops_unittest.cc.
+ unittest::TestAllTypes message1, message2;
+
+ TestUtil::SetAllFields(&message1);
+
+ // This field will test merging into an empty spot.
+ message2.set_optional_int32(message1.optional_int32());
+ message1.clear_optional_int32();
+
+ // This tests overwriting.
+ message2.set_optional_string(message1.optional_string());
+ message1.set_optional_string("something else");
+
+ // This tests concatenating.
+ message2.add_repeated_int32(message1.repeated_int32(1));
+ int32 i = message1.repeated_int32(0);
+ message1.clear_repeated_int32();
+ message1.add_repeated_int32(i);
+
+ message1.MergeFrom(message2);
+
+ TestUtil::ExpectAllFieldsSet(message1);
+}
+
+#ifdef GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+
+TEST(GeneratedMessageTest, MergeFromSelf) {
+ unittest::TestAllTypes message;
+ EXPECT_DEATH(message.MergeFrom(message), "&from");
+ EXPECT_DEATH(message.MergeFrom(implicit_cast<const Message&>(message)),
+ "&from");
+}
+
+#endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+
+TEST(GeneratedMessageTest, Serialization) {
+ unittest::TestAllTypes message1, message2;
+ string data;
+
+ TestUtil::SetAllFields(&message1);
+ message1.SerializeToString(&data);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(message2.ParseFromString(data));
+ TestUtil::ExpectAllFieldsSet(message2);
+
+}
+
+
+TEST(GeneratedMessageTest, Required) {
+ // Test that IsInitialized() returns false if required fields are missing.
+ unittest::TestRequired message;
+
+ EXPECT_FALSE(message.IsInitialized());
+ message.set_a(1);
+ EXPECT_FALSE(message.IsInitialized());
+ message.set_b(2);
+ EXPECT_FALSE(message.IsInitialized());
+ message.set_c(3);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(message.IsInitialized());
+}
+
+TEST(GeneratedMessageTest, RequiredForeign) {
+ // Test that IsInitialized() returns false if required fields in nested
+ // messages are missing.
+ unittest::TestRequiredForeign message;
+
+ EXPECT_TRUE(message.IsInitialized());
+
+ message.mutable_optional_message();
+ EXPECT_FALSE(message.IsInitialized());
+
+ message.mutable_optional_message()->set_a(1);
+ message.mutable_optional_message()->set_b(2);
+ message.mutable_optional_message()->set_c(3);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(message.IsInitialized());
+
+ message.add_repeated_message();
+ EXPECT_FALSE(message.IsInitialized());
+
+ message.mutable_repeated_message(0)->set_a(1);
+ message.mutable_repeated_message(0)->set_b(2);
+ message.mutable_repeated_message(0)->set_c(3);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(message.IsInitialized());
+}
+
+TEST(GeneratedMessageTest, ForeignNested) {
+ // Test that TestAllTypes::NestedMessage can be embedded directly into
+ // another message.
+ unittest::TestForeignNested message;
+
+ // If this compiles and runs without crashing, it must work. We have
+ // nothing more to test.
+ unittest::TestAllTypes::NestedMessage* nested =
+ message.mutable_foreign_nested();
+ nested->set_bb(1);
+}
+
+TEST(GeneratedMessageTest, ReallyLargeTagNumber) {
+ // Test that really large tag numbers don't break anything.
+ unittest::TestReallyLargeTagNumber message1, message2;
+ string data;
+
+ // For the most part, if this compiles and runs then we're probably good.
+ // (The most likely cause for failure would be if something were attempting
+ // to allocate a lookup table of some sort using tag numbers as the index.)
+ // We'll try serializing just for fun.
+ message1.set_a(1234);
+ message1.set_bb(5678);
+ message1.SerializeToString(&data);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(message2.ParseFromString(data));
+ EXPECT_EQ(1234, message2.a());
+ EXPECT_EQ(5678, message2.bb());
+}
+
+TEST(GeneratedMessageTest, MutualRecursion) {
+ // Test that mutually-recursive message types work.
+ unittest::TestMutualRecursionA message;
+ unittest::TestMutualRecursionA* nested = message.mutable_bb()->mutable_a();
+ unittest::TestMutualRecursionA* nested2 = nested->mutable_bb()->mutable_a();
+
+ // Again, if the above compiles and runs, that's all we really have to
+ // test, but just for run we'll check that the system didn't somehow come
+ // up with a pointer loop...
+ EXPECT_NE(&message, nested);
+ EXPECT_NE(&message, nested2);
+ EXPECT_NE(nested, nested2);
+}
+
+TEST(GeneratedMessageTest, CamelCaseFieldNames) {
+ // This test is mainly checking that the following compiles, which verifies
+ // that the field names were coerced to lower-case.
+ //
+ // Protocol buffers standard style is to use lowercase-with-underscores for
+ // field names. Some old proto1 .protos unfortunately used camel-case field
+ // names. In proto1, these names were forced to lower-case. So, we do the
+ // same thing in proto2.
+
+ unittest::TestCamelCaseFieldNames message;
+
+ message.set_primitivefield(2);
+ message.set_stringfield("foo");
+ message.set_enumfield(unittest::FOREIGN_FOO);
+ message.mutable_messagefield()->set_c(6);
+
+ message.add_repeatedprimitivefield(8);
+ message.add_repeatedstringfield("qux");
+ message.add_repeatedenumfield(unittest::FOREIGN_BAR);
+ message.add_repeatedmessagefield()->set_c(15);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, message.primitivefield());
+ EXPECT_EQ("foo", message.stringfield());
+ EXPECT_EQ(unittest::FOREIGN_FOO, message.enumfield());
+ EXPECT_EQ(6, message.messagefield().c());
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(8, message.repeatedprimitivefield(0));
+ EXPECT_EQ("qux", message.repeatedstringfield(0));
+ EXPECT_EQ(unittest::FOREIGN_BAR, message.repeatedenumfield(0));
+ EXPECT_EQ(15, message.repeatedmessagefield(0).c());
+}
+
+TEST(GeneratedMessageTest, TestConflictingSymbolNames) {
+ // test_bad_identifiers.proto successfully compiled, then it works. The
+ // following is just a token usage to insure that the code is, in fact,
+ // being compiled and linked.
+
+ protobuf_unittest::TestConflictingSymbolNames message;
+ message.set_uint32(1);
+ EXPECT_EQ(3, message.ByteSize());
+
+ message.set_friend_(5);
+ EXPECT_EQ(5, message.friend_());
+}
+
+TEST(GeneratedMessageTest, TestOptimizedForSize) {
+ // We rely on the tests in reflection_ops_unittest and wire_format_unittest
+ // to really test that reflection-based methods work. Here we are mostly
+ // just making sure that TestOptimizedForSize actually builds and seems to
+ // function.
+
+ protobuf_unittest::TestOptimizedForSize message, message2;
+ message.set_i(1);
+ message.mutable_msg()->set_c(2);
+ message2.CopyFrom(message);
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, message2.i());
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, message2.msg().c());
+}
+
+TEST(GeneratedMessageTest, TestEmbedOptimizedForSize) {
+ // Verifies that something optimized for speed can contain something optimized
+ // for size.
+
+ protobuf_unittest::TestEmbedOptimizedForSize message, message2;
+ message.mutable_optional_message()->set_i(1);
+ message.add_repeated_message()->mutable_msg()->set_c(2);
+ string data;
+ message.SerializeToString(&data);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(message2.ParseFromString(data));
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, message2.optional_message().i());
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, message2.repeated_message(0).msg().c());
+}
+
+// ===================================================================
+
+TEST(GeneratedEnumTest, EnumValuesAsSwitchCases) {
+ // Test that our nested enum values can be used as switch cases. This test
+ // doesn't actually do anything, the proof that it works is that it
+ // compiles.
+ int i =0;
+ unittest::TestAllTypes::NestedEnum a = unittest::TestAllTypes::BAR;
+ switch (a) {
+ case unittest::TestAllTypes::FOO:
+ i = 1;
+ break;
+ case unittest::TestAllTypes::BAR:
+ i = 2;
+ break;
+ case unittest::TestAllTypes::BAZ:
+ i = 3;
+ break;
+ // no default case: We want to make sure the compiler recognizes that
+ // all cases are covered. (GCC warns if you do not cover all cases of
+ // an enum in a switch.)
+ }
+
+ // Token check just for fun.
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, i);
+}
+
+TEST(GeneratedEnumTest, IsValidValue) {
+ // Test enum IsValidValue.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(unittest::TestAllTypes::NestedEnum_IsValid(1));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(unittest::TestAllTypes::NestedEnum_IsValid(2));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(unittest::TestAllTypes::NestedEnum_IsValid(3));
+
+ EXPECT_FALSE(unittest::TestAllTypes::NestedEnum_IsValid(0));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(unittest::TestAllTypes::NestedEnum_IsValid(4));
+
+ // Make sure it also works when there are dups.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(unittest::TestEnumWithDupValue_IsValid(1));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(unittest::TestEnumWithDupValue_IsValid(2));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(unittest::TestEnumWithDupValue_IsValid(3));
+
+ EXPECT_FALSE(unittest::TestEnumWithDupValue_IsValid(0));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(unittest::TestEnumWithDupValue_IsValid(4));
+}
+
+TEST(GeneratedEnumTest, MinAndMax) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(unittest::TestAllTypes::FOO,unittest::TestAllTypes::NestedEnum_MIN);
+ EXPECT_EQ(unittest::TestAllTypes::BAZ,unittest::TestAllTypes::NestedEnum_MAX);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(unittest::FOREIGN_FOO, unittest::ForeignEnum_MIN);
+ EXPECT_EQ(unittest::FOREIGN_BAZ, unittest::ForeignEnum_MAX);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, unittest::TestEnumWithDupValue_MIN);
+ EXPECT_EQ(3, unittest::TestEnumWithDupValue_MAX);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(unittest::SPARSE_E, unittest::TestSparseEnum_MIN);
+ EXPECT_EQ(unittest::SPARSE_C, unittest::TestSparseEnum_MAX);
+
+ // Make sure we can use _MIN and _MAX as switch cases.
+ switch(unittest::SPARSE_A) {
+ case unittest::TestSparseEnum_MIN:
+ case unittest::TestSparseEnum_MAX:
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+}
+
+// ===================================================================
+
+// Support code for testing services.
+class GeneratedServiceTest : public testing::Test {
+ protected:
+ class MockTestService : public unittest::TestService {
+ public:
+ MockTestService()
+ : called_(false),
+ method_(""),
+ controller_(NULL),
+ request_(NULL),
+ response_(NULL),
+ done_(NULL) {}
+
+ ~MockTestService() {}
+
+ void Reset() { called_ = false; }
+
+ // implements TestService ----------------------------------------
+
+ void Foo(RpcController* controller,
+ const unittest::FooRequest* request,
+ unittest::FooResponse* response,
+ Closure* done) {
+ ASSERT_FALSE(called_);
+ called_ = true;
+ method_ = "Foo";
+ controller_ = controller;
+ request_ = request;
+ response_ = response;
+ done_ = done;
+ }
+
+ void Bar(RpcController* controller,
+ const unittest::BarRequest* request,
+ unittest::BarResponse* response,
+ Closure* done) {
+ ASSERT_FALSE(called_);
+ called_ = true;
+ method_ = "Bar";
+ controller_ = controller;
+ request_ = request;
+ response_ = response;
+ done_ = done;
+ }
+
+ // ---------------------------------------------------------------
+
+ bool called_;
+ string method_;
+ RpcController* controller_;
+ const Message* request_;
+ Message* response_;
+ Closure* done_;
+ };
+
+ class MockRpcChannel : public RpcChannel {
+ public:
+ MockRpcChannel()
+ : called_(false),
+ method_(NULL),
+ controller_(NULL),
+ request_(NULL),
+ response_(NULL),
+ done_(NULL),
+ destroyed_(NULL) {}
+
+ ~MockRpcChannel() {
+ if (destroyed_ != NULL) *destroyed_ = true;
+ }
+
+ void Reset() { called_ = false; }
+
+ // implements TestService ----------------------------------------
+
+ void CallMethod(const MethodDescriptor* method,
+ RpcController* controller,
+ const Message* request,
+ Message* response,
+ Closure* done) {
+ ASSERT_FALSE(called_);
+ called_ = true;
+ method_ = method;
+ controller_ = controller;
+ request_ = request;
+ response_ = response;
+ done_ = done;
+ }
+
+ // ---------------------------------------------------------------
+
+ bool called_;
+ const MethodDescriptor* method_;
+ RpcController* controller_;
+ const Message* request_;
+ Message* response_;
+ Closure* done_;
+ bool* destroyed_;
+ };
+
+ class MockController : public RpcController {
+ public:
+ void Reset() {
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "Reset() not expected during this test.";
+ }
+ bool Failed() const {
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "Failed() not expected during this test.";
+ return false;
+ }
+ string ErrorText() const {
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "ErrorText() not expected during this test.";
+ return "";
+ }
+ void StartCancel() {
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "StartCancel() not expected during this test.";
+ }
+ void SetFailed(const string& reason) {
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "SetFailed() not expected during this test.";
+ }
+ bool IsCanceled() const {
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "IsCanceled() not expected during this test.";
+ return false;
+ }
+ void NotifyOnCancel(Closure* callback) {
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "NotifyOnCancel() not expected during this test.";
+ }
+ };
+
+ GeneratedServiceTest()
+ : descriptor_(unittest::TestService::descriptor()),
+ foo_(descriptor_->FindMethodByName("Foo")),
+ bar_(descriptor_->FindMethodByName("Bar")),
+ stub_(&mock_channel_),
+ done_(NewPermanentCallback(&DoNothing)) {}
+
+ virtual void SetUp() {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(foo_ != NULL);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(bar_ != NULL);
+ }
+
+ const ServiceDescriptor* descriptor_;
+ const MethodDescriptor* foo_;
+ const MethodDescriptor* bar_;
+
+ MockTestService mock_service_;
+ MockController mock_controller_;
+
+ MockRpcChannel mock_channel_;
+ unittest::TestService::Stub stub_;
+
+ // Just so we don't have to re-define these with every test.
+ unittest::FooRequest foo_request_;
+ unittest::FooResponse foo_response_;
+ unittest::BarRequest bar_request_;
+ unittest::BarResponse bar_response_;
+ scoped_ptr<Closure> done_;
+};
+
+TEST_F(GeneratedServiceTest, GetDescriptor) {
+ // Test that GetDescriptor() works.
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(descriptor_, mock_service_.GetDescriptor());
+}
+
+TEST_F(GeneratedServiceTest, GetChannel) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(&mock_channel_, stub_.channel());
+}
+
+TEST_F(GeneratedServiceTest, OwnsChannel) {
+ MockRpcChannel* channel = new MockRpcChannel;
+ bool destroyed = false;
+ channel->destroyed_ = &destroyed;
+
+ {
+ unittest::TestService::Stub owning_stub(channel,
+ Service::STUB_OWNS_CHANNEL);
+ EXPECT_FALSE(destroyed);
+ }
+
+ EXPECT_TRUE(destroyed);
+}
+
+TEST_F(GeneratedServiceTest, CallMethod) {
+ // Test that CallMethod() works.
+
+ // Call Foo() via CallMethod().
+ mock_service_.CallMethod(foo_, &mock_controller_,
+ &foo_request_, &foo_response_, done_.get());
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(mock_service_.called_);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ("Foo" , mock_service_.method_ );
+ EXPECT_EQ(&mock_controller_, mock_service_.controller_);
+ EXPECT_EQ(&foo_request_ , mock_service_.request_ );
+ EXPECT_EQ(&foo_response_ , mock_service_.response_ );
+ EXPECT_EQ(done_.get() , mock_service_.done_ );
+
+ // Try again, but call Bar() instead.
+ mock_service_.Reset();
+ mock_service_.CallMethod(bar_, &mock_controller_,
+ &bar_request_, &bar_response_, done_.get());
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(mock_service_.called_);
+ EXPECT_EQ("Bar", mock_service_.method_);
+}
+
+TEST_F(GeneratedServiceTest, CallMethodTypeFailure) {
+ // Verify death if we call Foo() with Bar's message types.
+
+#ifdef GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST // death tests do not work on Windows yet
+ EXPECT_DEBUG_DEATH(
+ mock_service_.CallMethod(foo_, &mock_controller_,
+ &foo_request_, &bar_response_, done_.get()),
+ "dynamic_cast");
+
+ mock_service_.Reset();
+ EXPECT_DEBUG_DEATH(
+ mock_service_.CallMethod(foo_, &mock_controller_,
+ &bar_request_, &foo_response_, done_.get()),
+ "dynamic_cast");
+#endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+}
+
+TEST_F(GeneratedServiceTest, GetPrototypes) {
+ // Test Get{Request,Response}Prototype() methods.
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(&unittest::FooRequest::default_instance(),
+ &mock_service_.GetRequestPrototype(foo_));
+ EXPECT_EQ(&unittest::BarRequest::default_instance(),
+ &mock_service_.GetRequestPrototype(bar_));
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(&unittest::FooResponse::default_instance(),
+ &mock_service_.GetResponsePrototype(foo_));
+ EXPECT_EQ(&unittest::BarResponse::default_instance(),
+ &mock_service_.GetResponsePrototype(bar_));
+}
+
+TEST_F(GeneratedServiceTest, Stub) {
+ // Test that the stub class works.
+
+ // Call Foo() via the stub.
+ stub_.Foo(&mock_controller_, &foo_request_, &foo_response_, done_.get());
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(mock_channel_.called_);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(foo_ , mock_channel_.method_ );
+ EXPECT_EQ(&mock_controller_, mock_channel_.controller_);
+ EXPECT_EQ(&foo_request_ , mock_channel_.request_ );
+ EXPECT_EQ(&foo_response_ , mock_channel_.response_ );
+ EXPECT_EQ(done_.get() , mock_channel_.done_ );
+
+ // Call Bar() via the stub.
+ mock_channel_.Reset();
+ stub_.Bar(&mock_controller_, &bar_request_, &bar_response_, done_.get());
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(mock_channel_.called_);
+ EXPECT_EQ(bar_, mock_channel_.method_);
+}
+
+TEST_F(GeneratedServiceTest, NotImplemented) {
+ // Test that failing to implement a method of a service causes it to fail
+ // with a "not implemented" error message.
+
+ // A service which doesn't implement any methods.
+ class UnimplementedService : public unittest::TestService {
+ public:
+ UnimplementedService() {}
+ };
+
+ UnimplementedService unimplemented_service;
+
+ // And a controller which expects to get a "not implemented" error.
+ class ExpectUnimplementedController : public MockController {
+ public:
+ ExpectUnimplementedController() : called_(false) {}
+
+ void SetFailed(const string& reason) {
+ EXPECT_FALSE(called_);
+ called_ = true;
+ EXPECT_EQ("Method Foo() not implemented.", reason);
+ }
+
+ bool called_;
+ };
+
+ ExpectUnimplementedController controller;
+
+ // Call Foo.
+ unimplemented_service.Foo(&controller, &foo_request_, &foo_response_,
+ done_.get());
+
+ EXPECT_TRUE(controller.called_);
+}
+
+} // namespace
+
+} // namespace cpp
+} // namespace compiler
+} // namespace protobuf
+} // namespace google