diff options
17 files changed, 83 insertions, 103 deletions
diff --git a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf.Test/CodedInputStreamTest.cs b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf.Test/CodedInputStreamTest.cs index 42c740ac..c8326d80 100644 --- a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf.Test/CodedInputStreamTest.cs +++ b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf.Test/CodedInputStreamTest.cs @@ -281,7 +281,6 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf CodedInputStream input = new CodedInputStream(ms);
Assert.AreEqual(tag, input.ReadTag());
- // TODO(jonskeet): Should this be ArgumentNullException instead?
Assert.Throws<InvalidProtocolBufferException>(() => input.ReadBytes());
}
diff --git a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/ByteString.cs b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/ByteString.cs index 2aa62483..3d55f02d 100644 --- a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/ByteString.cs +++ b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/ByteString.cs @@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf {
/// <summary>
/// Immutable array of bytes.
- /// TODO(jonskeet): Implement the common collection interfaces?
/// </summary>
public sealed class ByteString : IEnumerable<byte>, IEquatable<ByteString>
{
@@ -284,8 +283,6 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf return !(lhs == rhs);
}
- // TODO(jonskeet): CopyTo if it turns out to be required
-
/// <summary>
/// Compares this byte string with another object.
/// </summary>
diff --git a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/CodedInputStream.cs b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/CodedInputStream.cs index dcd19e48..c8b33b33 100644 --- a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/CodedInputStream.cs +++ b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/CodedInputStream.cs @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ // OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
#endregion
+using Google.Protobuf.Collections;
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.IO;
@@ -40,20 +41,21 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf /// Readings and decodes protocol message fields.
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>
- /// This class contains two kinds of methods: methods that read specific
- /// protocol message constructs and field types (e.g. ReadTag and
- /// ReadInt32) and methods that read low-level values (e.g.
- /// ReadRawVarint32 and ReadRawBytes). If you are reading encoded protocol
- /// messages, you should use the former methods, but if you are reading some
- /// other format of your own design, use the latter. The names of the former
- /// methods are taken from the protocol buffer type names, not .NET types.
- /// (Hence ReadFloat instead of ReadSingle, and ReadBool instead of ReadBoolean.)
- ///
- /// TODO(jonskeet): Consider whether recursion and size limits shouldn't be readonly,
- /// set at construction time.
+ /// <para>
+ /// This class is generally used by generated code to read appropriate
+ /// primitives from the stream. It effectively encapsulates the lowest
+ /// levels of protocol buffer format.
+ /// </para>
+ /// <para>
+ /// Repeated fields and map fields are not handled by this class; use <see cref="RepeatedField{T}"/>
+ /// and <see cref="MapField{TKey, TValue}"/> to serialize such fields.
+ /// </para>
/// </remarks>
public sealed class CodedInputStream
{
+ // TODO(jonskeet): Consider whether recursion and size limits shouldn't be readonly,
+ // set at construction time.
+
/// <summary>
/// Buffer of data read from the stream or provided at construction time.
/// </summary>
@@ -1022,7 +1024,6 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf if (totalBytesRetired + bufferPos + size > currentLimit)
{
// Read to the end of the stream (up to the current limit) anyway.
- // TODO(jonskeet): This is the only usage of SkipRawBytes. Do we really need to do it?
SkipRawBytes(currentLimit - totalBytesRetired - bufferPos);
// Then fail.
throw InvalidProtocolBufferException.TruncatedMessage();
diff --git a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/CodedOutputStream.cs b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/CodedOutputStream.cs index 08ea7005..d6355f03 100644 --- a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/CodedOutputStream.cs +++ b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/CodedOutputStream.cs @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ // OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
#endregion
+using Google.Protobuf.Collections;
using System;
using System.IO;
using System.Text;
@@ -40,14 +41,19 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf /// Encodes and writes protocol message fields.
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>
- /// This class contains two kinds of methods: methods that write specific
- /// protocol message constructs and field types (e.g. WriteTag and
- /// WriteInt32) and methods that write low-level values (e.g.
- /// WriteRawVarint32 and WriteRawBytes). If you are writing encoded protocol
- /// messages, you should use the former methods, but if you are writing some
- /// other format of your own design, use the latter. The names of the former
- /// methods are taken from the protocol buffer type names, not .NET types.
- /// (Hence WriteFloat instead of WriteSingle, and WriteBool instead of WriteBoolean.)
+ /// <para>
+ /// This class is generally used by generated code to write appropriate
+ /// primitives to the stream. It effectively encapsulates the lowest
+ /// levels of protocol buffer format. Unlike some other implementations,
+ /// this does not include combined "write tag and value" methods. Generated
+ /// code knows the exact byte representations of the tags they're going to write,
+ /// so there's no need to re-encode them each time. Manually-written code calling
+ /// this class should just call one of the <c>WriteTag</c> overloads before each value.
+ /// </para>
+ /// <para>
+ /// Repeated fields and map fields are not handled by this class; use <c>RepeatedField<T></c>
+ /// and <c>MapField<TKey, TValue></c> to serialize such fields.
+ /// </para>
/// </remarks>
public sealed partial class CodedOutputStream
{
diff --git a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Collections/RepeatedField.cs b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Collections/RepeatedField.cs index c901864a..d9ced6ec 100644 --- a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Collections/RepeatedField.cs +++ b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Collections/RepeatedField.cs @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf.Collections public void AddEntriesFrom(CodedInputStream input, FieldCodec<T> codec) { // TODO: Inline some of the Add code, so we can avoid checking the size on every - // iteration and the mutability. + // iteration. uint tag = input.LastTag; var reader = codec.ValueReader; // Value types can be packed or not. @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf.Collections { throw new ArgumentNullException("values"); } - // TODO: Check for ICollection and get the Count? + // TODO: Check for ICollection and get the Count, to optimize? foreach (T item in values) { Add(item); @@ -394,7 +394,6 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf.Collections { return false; } - // TODO(jonskeet): Does this box for enums? EqualityComparer<T> comparer = EqualityComparer<T>.Default; for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) { @@ -418,7 +417,6 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf.Collections { throw new ArgumentNullException("item"); } - // TODO(jonskeet): Does this box for enums? EqualityComparer<T> comparer = EqualityComparer<T>.Default; for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) { diff --git a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/FrameworkPortability.cs b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/FrameworkPortability.cs index 082eb2e1..9498dbe4 100644 --- a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/FrameworkPortability.cs +++ b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/FrameworkPortability.cs @@ -40,10 +40,9 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf /// </summary>
internal static class FrameworkPortability
{
- // TODO(jtattermusch): is this still a thing?
// The value of RegexOptions.Compiled is 8. We can test for the presence at
// execution time using Enum.IsDefined, so a single build will do the right thing
- // on each platform.
+ // on each platform. (RegexOptions.Compiled isn't supported by PCLs.)
internal static readonly RegexOptions CompiledRegexWhereAvailable =
Enum.IsDefined(typeof(RegexOptions), 8) ? (RegexOptions)8 : RegexOptions.None;
}
diff --git a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/IMessage.cs b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/IMessage.cs index 147c83ca..773845ff 100644 --- a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/IMessage.cs +++ b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/IMessage.cs @@ -35,8 +35,6 @@ using Google.Protobuf.Reflection; namespace Google.Protobuf
{
-
- // TODO(jonskeet): Do we want a "weak" (non-generic) version of IReflectedMessage?
// TODO(jonskeet): Split these interfaces into separate files when we're happy with them.
/// <summary>
diff --git a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/JsonFormatter.cs b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/JsonFormatter.cs index 7c4894be..12bbdfdd 100644 --- a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/JsonFormatter.cs +++ b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/JsonFormatter.cs @@ -158,7 +158,6 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf { var accessor = field.Accessor; // Oneofs are written later - // TODO: Change to write out fields in order, interleaving oneofs appropriately (as per binary format) if (field.ContainingOneof != null && field.ContainingOneof.Accessor.GetCaseFieldDescriptor(message) != field) { continue; @@ -425,7 +424,7 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf if (descriptor.FullName == ListValue.Descriptor.FullName) { var fieldAccessor = descriptor.Fields[ListValue.ValuesFieldNumber].Accessor; - WriteList(builder, fieldAccessor, (IList) fieldAccessor.GetValue(value)); + WriteList(builder, fieldAccessor, (IList) fieldAccessor.GetValue((IMessage) value)); return; } if (descriptor.FullName == Value.Descriptor.FullName) diff --git a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/FieldAccessorBase.cs b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/FieldAccessorBase.cs index 3fccf884..82ce5051 100644 --- a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/FieldAccessorBase.cs +++ b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/FieldAccessorBase.cs @@ -41,23 +41,23 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf.Reflection /// </summary> internal abstract class FieldAccessorBase : IFieldAccessor { - private readonly Func<object, object> getValueDelegate; + private readonly Func<IMessage, object> getValueDelegate; private readonly FieldDescriptor descriptor; internal FieldAccessorBase(PropertyInfo property, FieldDescriptor descriptor) { this.descriptor = descriptor; - getValueDelegate = ReflectionUtil.CreateFuncObjectObject(property.GetGetMethod()); + getValueDelegate = ReflectionUtil.CreateFuncIMessageObject(property.GetGetMethod()); } public FieldDescriptor Descriptor { get { return descriptor; } } - public object GetValue(object message) + public object GetValue(IMessage message) { return getValueDelegate(message); } - public abstract void Clear(object message); - public abstract void SetValue(object message, object value); + public abstract void Clear(IMessage message); + public abstract void SetValue(IMessage message, object value); } } diff --git a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/FileDescriptor.cs b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/FileDescriptor.cs index 72927702..500e467c 100644 --- a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/FileDescriptor.cs +++ b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/FileDescriptor.cs @@ -287,23 +287,23 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf.Reflection DescriptorPool pool = new DescriptorPool(dependencies); FileDescriptor result = new FileDescriptor(descriptorData, proto, dependencies, pool, allowUnknownDependencies, generatedCodeInfo); - // TODO(jonskeet): Reinstate these checks, or get rid of them entirely. They aren't in the Java code, - // and fail for the CustomOptions test right now. (We get "descriptor.proto" vs "google/protobuf/descriptor.proto".) - //if (dependencies.Length != proto.DependencyCount) - //{ - // throw new DescriptorValidationException(result, - // "Dependencies passed to FileDescriptor.BuildFrom() don't match " + - // "those listed in the FileDescriptorProto."); - //} - //for (int i = 0; i < proto.DependencyCount; i++) - //{ - // if (dependencies[i].Name != proto.DependencyList[i]) - // { - // throw new DescriptorValidationException(result, - // "Dependencies passed to FileDescriptor.BuildFrom() don't match " + - // "those listed in the FileDescriptorProto."); - // } - //} + // Validate that the dependencies we've been passed (as FileDescriptors) are actually the ones we + // need. + if (dependencies.Length != proto.Dependency.Count) + { + throw new DescriptorValidationException(result, + "Dependencies passed to FileDescriptor.BuildFrom() don't match " + + "those listed in the FileDescriptorProto."); + } + for (int i = 0; i < proto.Dependency.Count; i++) + { + if (dependencies[i].Name != proto.Dependency[i]) + { + throw new DescriptorValidationException(result, + "Dependencies passed to FileDescriptor.BuildFrom() don't match " + + "those listed in the FileDescriptorProto."); + } + } result.CrossLink(); return result; diff --git a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/IFieldAccessor.cs b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/IFieldAccessor.cs index f97d73ee..cfe56fde 100644 --- a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/IFieldAccessor.cs +++ b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/IFieldAccessor.cs @@ -45,20 +45,18 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf.Reflection /// </summary> FieldDescriptor Descriptor { get; } - // TODO: Should the argument type for these messages be IReflectedMessage? - /// <summary> /// Clears the field in the specified message. (For repeated fields, /// this clears the list.) /// </summary> - void Clear(object message); + void Clear(IMessage message); /// <summary> /// Fetches the field value. For repeated values, this will be an /// <see cref="IList"/> implementation. For map values, this will be an /// <see cref="IDictionary"/> implementation. /// </summary> - object GetValue(object message); + object GetValue(IMessage message); /// <summary> /// Mutator for single "simple" fields only. @@ -68,6 +66,6 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf.Reflection /// Map fields are mutated by fetching the value and manipulating it as a dictionary. /// </remarks> /// <exception cref="InvalidOperationException">The field is not a "simple" field.</exception> - void SetValue(object message, object value); + void SetValue(IMessage message, object value); } }
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/MapFieldAccessor.cs b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/MapFieldAccessor.cs index 6df4c5f0..9ed7f8c4 100644 --- a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/MapFieldAccessor.cs +++ b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/MapFieldAccessor.cs @@ -45,13 +45,13 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf.Reflection { } - public override void Clear(object message) + public override void Clear(IMessage message) { IDictionary list = (IDictionary) GetValue(message); list.Clear(); } - public override void SetValue(object message, object value) + public override void SetValue(IMessage message, object value) { throw new InvalidOperationException("SetValue is not implemented for map fields"); } diff --git a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/OneofAccessor.cs b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/OneofAccessor.cs index ff51291b..8714ab18 100644 --- a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/OneofAccessor.cs +++ b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/OneofAccessor.cs @@ -41,8 +41,8 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf.Reflection /// </summary> public sealed class OneofAccessor { - private readonly Func<object, int> caseDelegate; - private readonly Action<object> clearDelegate; + private readonly Func<IMessage, int> caseDelegate; + private readonly Action<IMessage> clearDelegate; private OneofDescriptor descriptor; internal OneofAccessor(PropertyInfo caseProperty, MethodInfo clearMethod, OneofDescriptor descriptor) @@ -52,10 +52,10 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf.Reflection throw new ArgumentException("Cannot read from property"); } this.descriptor = descriptor; - caseDelegate = ReflectionUtil.CreateFuncObjectT<int>(caseProperty.GetGetMethod()); + caseDelegate = ReflectionUtil.CreateFuncIMessageT<int>(caseProperty.GetGetMethod()); this.descriptor = descriptor; - clearDelegate = ReflectionUtil.CreateActionObject(clearMethod); + clearDelegate = ReflectionUtil.CreateActionIMessage(clearMethod); } /// <summary> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf.Reflection /// <summary> /// Clears the oneof in the specified message. /// </summary> - public void Clear(object message) + public void Clear(IMessage message) { clearDelegate(message); } @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf.Reflection /// <summary> /// Indicates which field in the oneof is set for specified message /// </summary> - public FieldDescriptor GetCaseFieldDescriptor(object message) + public FieldDescriptor GetCaseFieldDescriptor(IMessage message) { int fieldNumber = caseDelegate(message); if (fieldNumber > 0) diff --git a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/ReflectionUtil.cs b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/ReflectionUtil.cs index 5b3cbb36..df820ca3 100644 --- a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/ReflectionUtil.cs +++ b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/ReflectionUtil.cs @@ -56,52 +56,52 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf.Reflection /// Creates a delegate which will cast the argument to the appropriate method target type, /// call the method on it, then convert the result to object. /// </summary> - internal static Func<object, object> CreateFuncObjectObject(MethodInfo method) + internal static Func<IMessage, object> CreateFuncIMessageObject(MethodInfo method) { - ParameterExpression parameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(object), "p"); + ParameterExpression parameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(IMessage), "p"); Expression downcast = Expression.Convert(parameter, method.DeclaringType); Expression call = Expression.Call(downcast, method); Expression upcast = Expression.Convert(call, typeof(object)); - return Expression.Lambda<Func<object, object>>(upcast, parameter).Compile(); + return Expression.Lambda<Func<IMessage, object>>(upcast, parameter).Compile(); } /// <summary> /// Creates a delegate which will cast the argument to the appropriate method target type, /// call the method on it, then convert the result to the specified type. /// </summary> - internal static Func<object, T> CreateFuncObjectT<T>(MethodInfo method) + internal static Func<IMessage, T> CreateFuncIMessageT<T>(MethodInfo method) { - ParameterExpression parameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(object), "p"); + ParameterExpression parameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(IMessage), "p"); Expression downcast = Expression.Convert(parameter, method.DeclaringType); Expression call = Expression.Call(downcast, method); Expression upcast = Expression.Convert(call, typeof(T)); - return Expression.Lambda<Func<object, T>>(upcast, parameter).Compile(); + return Expression.Lambda<Func<IMessage, T>>(upcast, parameter).Compile(); } /// <summary> /// Creates a delegate which will execute the given method after casting the first argument to /// the target type of the method, and the second argument to the first parameter type of the method. /// </summary> - internal static Action<object, object> CreateActionObjectObject(MethodInfo method) + internal static Action<IMessage, object> CreateActionIMessageObject(MethodInfo method) { - ParameterExpression targetParameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(object), "target"); + ParameterExpression targetParameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(IMessage), "target"); ParameterExpression argParameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(object), "arg"); Expression castTarget = Expression.Convert(targetParameter, method.DeclaringType); Expression castArgument = Expression.Convert(argParameter, method.GetParameters()[0].ParameterType); Expression call = Expression.Call(castTarget, method, castArgument); - return Expression.Lambda<Action<object, object>>(call, targetParameter, argParameter).Compile(); + return Expression.Lambda<Action<IMessage, object>>(call, targetParameter, argParameter).Compile(); } /// <summary> /// Creates a delegate which will execute the given method after casting the first argument to /// the target type of the method. /// </summary> - internal static Action<object> CreateActionObject(MethodInfo method) + internal static Action<IMessage> CreateActionIMessage(MethodInfo method) { - ParameterExpression targetParameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(object), "target"); + ParameterExpression targetParameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(IMessage), "target"); Expression castTarget = Expression.Convert(targetParameter, method.DeclaringType); Expression call = Expression.Call(castTarget, method); - return Expression.Lambda<Action<object>>(call, targetParameter).Compile(); + return Expression.Lambda<Action<IMessage>>(call, targetParameter).Compile(); } } }
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/RepeatedFieldAccessor.cs b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/RepeatedFieldAccessor.cs index acb3c8d5..bd408470 100644 --- a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/RepeatedFieldAccessor.cs +++ b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/RepeatedFieldAccessor.cs @@ -45,13 +45,13 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf.Reflection { } - public override void Clear(object message) + public override void Clear(IMessage message) { IList list = (IList) GetValue(message); list.Clear(); } - public override void SetValue(object message, object value) + public override void SetValue(IMessage message, object value) { throw new InvalidOperationException("SetValue is not implemented for repeated fields"); } diff --git a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/SingleFieldAccessor.cs b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/SingleFieldAccessor.cs index 851efc26..de92fbc1 100644 --- a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/SingleFieldAccessor.cs +++ b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/Reflection/SingleFieldAccessor.cs @@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf.Reflection // and proto2 vs proto3 for non-message types, as proto3 doesn't support "full" presence detection or default // values. - private readonly Action<object, object> setValueDelegate; - private readonly Action<object> clearDelegate; + private readonly Action<IMessage, object> setValueDelegate; + private readonly Action<IMessage> clearDelegate; internal SingleFieldAccessor(PropertyInfo property, FieldDescriptor descriptor) : base(property, descriptor) { @@ -55,12 +55,10 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf.Reflection { throw new ArgumentException("Not all required properties/methods available"); } - setValueDelegate = ReflectionUtil.CreateActionObjectObject(property.GetSetMethod()); + setValueDelegate = ReflectionUtil.CreateActionIMessageObject(property.GetSetMethod()); var clrType = property.PropertyType; - // TODO: What should clear on a oneof member do? Clear the oneof? - // TODO: Validate that this is a reasonable single field? (Should be a value type, a message type, or string/ByteString.) object defaultValue = typeof(IMessage).IsAssignableFrom(clrType) ? null @@ -70,12 +68,12 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf.Reflection clearDelegate = message => SetValue(message, defaultValue); } - public override void Clear(object message) + public override void Clear(IMessage message) { clearDelegate(message); } - public override void SetValue(object message, object value) + public override void SetValue(IMessage message, object value) { setValueDelegate(message, value); } diff --git a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/WireFormat.cs b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/WireFormat.cs index b0e4a41f..faf1e715 100644 --- a/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/WireFormat.cs +++ b/csharp/src/Google.Protobuf/WireFormat.cs @@ -43,19 +43,6 @@ namespace Google.Protobuf /// </summary>
public static class WireFormat
{
- #region Fixed sizes.
-
- // TODO(jonskeet): Move these somewhere else. They're messy. Consider making FieldType a smarter kind of enum
- internal const int Fixed32Size = 4;
- internal const int Fixed64Size = 8;
- internal const int SFixed32Size = 4;
- internal const int SFixed64Size = 8;
- internal const int FloatSize = 4;
- internal const int DoubleSize = 8;
- internal const int BoolSize = 1;
-
- #endregion
-
/// <summary>
/// Wire types within protobuf encoding.
/// </summary>
|