aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
path: root/src/google/protobuf/preserve_unknown_enum_test.cc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGravatar Feng Xiao <xfxyjwf@gmail.com>2014-11-10 17:34:54 -0800
committerGravatar Feng Xiao <xfxyjwf@gmail.com>2014-11-10 17:34:54 -0800
commit6ef984af4b0c63c1c33127a12dcfc8e6359f0c9e (patch)
treed17c61ff9f3ae28224fbddac6d26bfc59e2cf755 /src/google/protobuf/preserve_unknown_enum_test.cc
parentbaca1a8a1aa180c42de6278d3b8286c4496c6a10 (diff)
Down-integrate from internal code base.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/google/protobuf/preserve_unknown_enum_test.cc')
-rw-r--r--src/google/protobuf/preserve_unknown_enum_test.cc230
1 files changed, 230 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/google/protobuf/preserve_unknown_enum_test.cc b/src/google/protobuf/preserve_unknown_enum_test.cc
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e988a5cb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/google/protobuf/preserve_unknown_enum_test.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
+// Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format
+// Copyright 2008 Google Inc. All rights reserved.
+// https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+
+#include <google/protobuf/unittest.pb.h>
+#include <google/protobuf/unittest_preserve_unknown_enum.pb.h>
+#include <google/protobuf/dynamic_message.h>
+#include <google/protobuf/descriptor.h>
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+
+namespace google {
+namespace protobuf {
+namespace {
+
+void FillMessage(
+ proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessagePlusExtra* message) {
+ message->set_e(
+ proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA);
+ message->add_repeated_e(
+ proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA);
+ message->add_repeated_packed_e(
+ proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA);
+ message->set_oneof_e_1(
+ proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA);
+}
+
+void CheckMessage(
+ const proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessagePlusExtra& message) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA,
+ message.e());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, message.repeated_e_size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA,
+ message.repeated_e(0));
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, message.repeated_packed_e_size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA,
+ message.repeated_packed_e(0));
+ EXPECT_EQ(proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA,
+ message.oneof_e_1());
+}
+
+void CheckMessage(
+ const proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessage& message) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(static_cast<int>(
+ proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA),
+ static_cast<int>(message.e()));
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, message.repeated_e_size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(static_cast<int>(
+ proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA),
+ static_cast<int>(message.repeated_e(0)));
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, message.repeated_packed_e_size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(static_cast<int>(
+ proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA),
+ static_cast<int>(message.repeated_packed_e(0)));
+ EXPECT_EQ(static_cast<int>(
+ proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA),
+ static_cast<int>(message.oneof_e_1()));
+}
+
+} // anonymous namespace
+
+// Test that parsing preserves an unknown value in the enum field and does not
+// punt it to the UnknownFieldSet.
+TEST(PreserveUnknownEnumTest, PreserveParseAndSerialize) {
+ proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessagePlusExtra orig_message;
+ FillMessage(&orig_message);
+ string serialized;
+ orig_message.SerializeToString(&serialized);
+
+ proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessage message;
+ EXPECT_EQ(true, message.ParseFromString(serialized));
+ CheckMessage(message);
+
+ serialized.clear();
+ message.SerializeToString(&serialized);
+ EXPECT_EQ(true, orig_message.ParseFromString(serialized));
+ CheckMessage(orig_message);
+}
+
+// Test that reflection based implementation also keeps unknown enum values and
+// doesn't put them into UnknownFieldSet.
+TEST(PreserveUnknownEnumTest, PreserveParseAndSerializeDynamicMessage) {
+ proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessagePlusExtra orig_message;
+ FillMessage(&orig_message);
+ string serialized = orig_message.SerializeAsString();
+
+ google::protobuf::DynamicMessageFactory factory;
+ scoped_ptr<google::protobuf::Message> message(factory.GetPrototype(
+ proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessage::descriptor())->New());
+ EXPECT_EQ(true, message->ParseFromString(serialized));
+ message->DiscardUnknownFields();
+
+ serialized = message->SerializeAsString();
+ EXPECT_EQ(true, orig_message.ParseFromString(serialized));
+ CheckMessage(orig_message);
+}
+
+// Test that reflection provides EnumValueDescriptors for unknown values.
+TEST(PreserveUnknownEnumTest, DynamicEnumValueDescriptors) {
+ proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessagePlusExtra orig_message;
+ FillMessage(&orig_message);
+ string serialized;
+ orig_message.SerializeToString(&serialized);
+
+ proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessage message;
+ EXPECT_EQ(true, message.ParseFromString(serialized));
+ CheckMessage(message);
+
+ const google::protobuf::Reflection* r = message.GetReflection();
+ const google::protobuf::Descriptor* d = message.GetDescriptor();
+ const google::protobuf::FieldDescriptor* field = d->FindFieldByName("e");
+
+ // This should dynamically create an EnumValueDescriptor.
+ const google::protobuf::EnumValueDescriptor* enum_value = r->GetEnum(message, field);
+ EXPECT_EQ(enum_value->number(),
+ static_cast<int>(proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA));
+
+ // Fetching value for a second time should return the same pointer.
+ const google::protobuf::EnumValueDescriptor* enum_value_second =
+ r->GetEnum(message, field);
+ EXPECT_EQ(enum_value, enum_value_second);
+
+ // Check the repeated case too.
+ const google::protobuf::FieldDescriptor* repeated_field =
+ d->FindFieldByName("repeated_e");
+ enum_value = r->GetRepeatedEnum(message, repeated_field, 0);
+ EXPECT_EQ(enum_value->number(),
+ static_cast<int>(proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA));
+ // Should reuse the same EnumValueDescriptor, even for a different field.
+ EXPECT_EQ(enum_value, enum_value_second);
+
+ // We should be able to use the returned value descriptor to set a value on
+ // another message.
+ google::protobuf::Message* m = message.New();
+ r->SetEnum(m, field, enum_value);
+ EXPECT_EQ(enum_value, r->GetEnum(*m, field));
+ delete m;
+}
+
+// Test that the new integer-based enum reflection API works.
+TEST(PreserveUnknownEnumTest, IntegerEnumReflectionAPI) {
+ proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessage message;
+ const google::protobuf::Reflection* r = message.GetReflection();
+ const google::protobuf::Descriptor* d = message.GetDescriptor();
+
+ const google::protobuf::FieldDescriptor* singular_field = d->FindFieldByName("e");
+ const google::protobuf::FieldDescriptor* repeated_field =
+ d->FindFieldByName("repeated_e");
+
+ r->SetEnumValue(&message, singular_field, 42);
+ EXPECT_EQ(42, r->GetEnumValue(message, singular_field));
+ r->AddEnumValue(&message, repeated_field, 42);
+ r->AddEnumValue(&message, repeated_field, 42);
+ EXPECT_EQ(42, r->GetRepeatedEnumValue(message, repeated_field, 0));
+ r->SetRepeatedEnumValue(&message, repeated_field, 1, 84);
+ EXPECT_EQ(84, r->GetRepeatedEnumValue(message, repeated_field, 1));
+ const google::protobuf::EnumValueDescriptor* enum_value = r->GetEnum(message,
+ singular_field);
+ EXPECT_EQ(42, enum_value->number());
+}
+
+// Test that the EnumValue API works properly for proto2 messages as well.
+TEST(PreserveUnknownEnumTest, Proto2CatchesUnknownValues) {
+ protobuf_unittest::TestAllTypes message; // proto2 message
+ const google::protobuf::Reflection* r = message.GetReflection();
+ const google::protobuf::Descriptor* d = message.GetDescriptor();
+ const google::protobuf::FieldDescriptor* singular_field =
+ d->FindFieldByName("optional_nested_enum");
+ const google::protobuf::FieldDescriptor* repeated_field =
+ d->FindFieldByName("repeated_nested_enum");
+ // Add one element to the repeated field so that we can test
+ // SetRepeatedEnumValue.
+ const google::protobuf::EnumValueDescriptor* enum_value =
+ repeated_field->enum_type()->FindValueByName("BAR");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(enum_value != NULL);
+ r->AddEnum(&message, repeated_field, enum_value);
+
+ // Enum-field integer-based setters GOOGLE_DCHECK-fail on invalid values, in order to
+ // remain consistent with proto2 generated code.
+ EXPECT_DEBUG_DEATH({
+ r->SetEnumValue(&message, singular_field, 4242);
+ r->GetEnum(message, singular_field)->number();
+ }, "SetEnumValue accepts only valid integer values");
+ EXPECT_DEBUG_DEATH({
+ r->SetRepeatedEnumValue(&message, repeated_field, 0, 4242);
+ r->GetRepeatedEnum(message, repeated_field, 0);
+ }, "SetRepeatedEnumValue accepts only valid integer values");
+ EXPECT_DEBUG_DEATH({
+ r->AddEnumValue(&message, repeated_field, 4242);
+ r->GetRepeatedEnum(message, repeated_field, 1);
+ }, "AddEnumValue accepts only valid integer values");
+}
+
+TEST(PreserveUnknownEnumTest, SupportsUnknownEnumValuesAPI) {
+ protobuf_unittest::TestAllTypes proto2_message;
+ proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessage new_message;
+
+ const google::protobuf::Reflection* proto2_reflection = proto2_message.GetReflection();
+ const google::protobuf::Reflection* new_reflection = new_message.GetReflection();
+
+ EXPECT_FALSE(proto2_reflection->SupportsUnknownEnumValues());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(new_reflection->SupportsUnknownEnumValues());
+}
+} // namespace protobuf
+} // namespace google