Remove a redundant layer of directory hierarchy.

1 files changed, 118 insertions, 118 deletions

diff --git a/csharp/protos/extest/unittest_issues.proto b/csharp/protos/unittest_issues.proto
index 376eee84..989b3dc4 100644
--- a/csharp/protos/extest/unittest_issues.proto
+++ b/csharp/protos/unittest_issues.proto
@@ -1,119 +1,119 @@
-syntax = "proto3";

-

-// These proto descriptors have at one time been reported as an issue or defect.

-// They are kept here to replicate the issue, and continue to verify the fix.

-

-// Issue: Non-"Google.Protobuffers" namespace will ensure that protobuffer library types are qualified

-option csharp_namespace = "UnitTest.Issues.TestProtos";

-

-package unittest_issues;

-option optimize_for = SPEED;

-

-// Issue 307: when generating doubly-nested types, any references

-// should be of the form A.Types.B.Types.C.

-message Issue307 {

-  message NestedOnce {

-    message NestedTwice {

-    }

-  }

-}

-

-// Old issue 13: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=13

-// New issue 309: https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/309

- 

-// message A {

-//    optional int32 _A = 1;

-// }

-

-// message B {

-//    optional int32 B_ = 1;

-// }

-

-//message AB {

-//    optional int32 a_b = 1;

-//}

-

-// Similar issue with numeric names

-// Java code failed too, so probably best for this to be a restriction.

-// See https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/308

-// message NumberField {

-//    optional int32 _01 = 1;

-// }

-

-// issue 19 - negative enum values

-

-enum NegativeEnum {

-    NEGATIVE_ENUM_ZERO = 0;

-    FiveBelow = -5;

-    MinusOne = -1;

-}

-

-message NegativeEnumMessage { 

-    NegativeEnum value = 1;

-    repeated NegativeEnum values = 2 [packed = false];

-    repeated NegativeEnum packed_values = 3 [packed=true];

-}

-

-// Issue 21: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=21

-// Decorate fields with [deprecated=true] as [System.Obsolete]

-

-message DeprecatedChild {

-}

-

-enum DeprecatedEnum {

-    DEPRECATED_ZERO = 0;

-    one = 1;

-}

-

-message DeprecatedFieldsMessage {

-    int32 PrimitiveValue = 1 [deprecated = true];

-    repeated int32 PrimitiveArray = 2 [deprecated = true];

-

-    DeprecatedChild MessageValue = 3 [deprecated = true];

-    repeated DeprecatedChild MessageArray = 4 [deprecated = true];

-

-    DeprecatedEnum EnumValue = 5 [deprecated = true];

-    repeated DeprecatedEnum EnumArray = 6 [deprecated = true];

-}

-

-// Issue 45: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=45

-message ItemField {

-  int32 item = 1;

-}

-

-message ReservedNames {

-  // Force a nested type called Types

-  message SomeNestedType {

-  }

-

-  int32 types = 1;

-  int32 descriptor = 2;

-}

-

-message TestJsonFieldOrdering {

-  // These fields are deliberately not declared in numeric

-  // order, and the oneof fields aren't contiguous either.

-  // This allows for reasonably robust tests of JSON output

-  // ordering.

-  // TestFieldOrderings in unittest_proto3.proto is similar,

-  // but doesn't include oneofs.

-  // TODO: Consider adding oneofs to TestFieldOrderings, although

-  // that will require fixing other tests in multiple platforms.

-  // Alternatively, consider just adding this to

-  // unittest_proto3.proto if multiple platforms want it.

-  

-  int32 plain_int32 = 4;

-

-  oneof o1 {

-    string o1_string = 2;

-    int32 o1_int32 = 5;

-  }

-  

-  string plain_string = 1;

-  

-  oneof o2 {

-    int32 o2_int32 = 6;

-    string o2_string = 3;

-  }

-  

+syntax = "proto3";
+
+// These proto descriptors have at one time been reported as an issue or defect.
+// They are kept here to replicate the issue, and continue to verify the fix.
+
+// Issue: Non-"Google.Protobuffers" namespace will ensure that protobuffer library types are qualified
+option csharp_namespace = "UnitTest.Issues.TestProtos";
+
+package unittest_issues;
+option optimize_for = SPEED;
+
+// Issue 307: when generating doubly-nested types, any references
+// should be of the form A.Types.B.Types.C.
+message Issue307 {
+  message NestedOnce {
+    message NestedTwice {
+    }
+  }
+}
+
+// Old issue 13: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=13
+// New issue 309: https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/309
+ 
+// message A {
+//    optional int32 _A = 1;
+// }
+
+// message B {
+//    optional int32 B_ = 1;
+// }
+
+//message AB {
+//    optional int32 a_b = 1;
+//}
+
+// Similar issue with numeric names
+// Java code failed too, so probably best for this to be a restriction.
+// See https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/308
+// message NumberField {
+//    optional int32 _01 = 1;
+// }
+
+// issue 19 - negative enum values
+
+enum NegativeEnum {
+    NEGATIVE_ENUM_ZERO = 0;
+    FiveBelow = -5;
+    MinusOne = -1;
+}
+
+message NegativeEnumMessage {
+    NegativeEnum value = 1;
+    repeated NegativeEnum values = 2 [packed = false];
+    repeated NegativeEnum packed_values = 3 [packed=true];
+}
+
+// Issue 21: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=21
+// Decorate fields with [deprecated=true] as [System.Obsolete]
+
+message DeprecatedChild {
+}
+
+enum DeprecatedEnum {
+    DEPRECATED_ZERO = 0;
+    one = 1;
+}
+
+message DeprecatedFieldsMessage {
+    int32 PrimitiveValue = 1 [deprecated = true];
+    repeated int32 PrimitiveArray = 2 [deprecated = true];
+
+    DeprecatedChild MessageValue = 3 [deprecated = true];
+    repeated DeprecatedChild MessageArray = 4 [deprecated = true];
+
+    DeprecatedEnum EnumValue = 5 [deprecated = true];
+    repeated DeprecatedEnum EnumArray = 6 [deprecated = true];
+}
+
+// Issue 45: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=45
+message ItemField {
+  int32 item = 1;
+}
+
+message ReservedNames {
+  // Force a nested type called Types
+  message SomeNestedType {
+  }
+
+  int32 types = 1;
+  int32 descriptor = 2;
+}
+
+message TestJsonFieldOrdering {
+  // These fields are deliberately not declared in numeric
+  // order, and the oneof fields aren't contiguous either.
+  // This allows for reasonably robust tests of JSON output
+  // ordering.
+  // TestFieldOrderings in unittest_proto3.proto is similar,
+  // but doesn't include oneofs.
+  // TODO: Consider adding oneofs to TestFieldOrderings, although
+  // that will require fixing other tests in multiple platforms.
+  // Alternatively, consider just adding this to
+  // unittest_proto3.proto if multiple platforms want it.
+  
+  int32 plain_int32 = 4;
+
+  oneof o1 {
+    string o1_string = 2;
+    int32 o1_int32 = 5;
+  }
+  
+  string plain_string = 1;
+  
+  oneof o2 {
+    int32 o2_int32 = 6;
+    string o2_string = 3;
+  }
+  
 }
\ No newline at end of file