aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
path: root/etc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGravatar David Aspinall <da@inf.ed.ac.uk>1998-12-14 15:37:12 +0000
committerGravatar David Aspinall <da@inf.ed.ac.uk>1998-12-14 15:37:12 +0000
commite5a5aa225eb864da82c00870698d79befca977d8 (patch)
tree67a5a5d8bd26a160814184bab35400766934956a /etc
parent89f4ac8070b2b7505dde4be775f764493af3bea3 (diff)
Altered order of new para and removed some mailing list addrs
Diffstat (limited to 'etc')
-rw-r--r--etc/announce22
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/etc/announce b/etc/announce
index 5b64d87b..1282a024 100644
--- a/etc/announce
+++ b/etc/announce
@@ -5,10 +5,8 @@ To: coq-club@pauillac.inria.fr,
uitp@dcs.gla.ac.uk,
bra-types@cs.chalmers.se,
info-hol@leopard.cs.byu.edu,
- protagonist@cs.kun.nl, ???
pvs@csl.sri.com,
qed@mcs.anl.gov,
- softverf@leopard.cs.byu.edu, ???
theorem-provers@ai.mit.edu,
types@cs.indiana.edu,
formal-methods@cs.uidaho.edu,
@@ -113,17 +111,15 @@ Proof General provides a unified interface to different theorem
provers. The advantage is that a novice who understands the Proof
General interface can inspect and replay proofs in any of the theorem
provers supported, without knowing the specific commands needed to
-drive them. An obvious avenue towards further and easier unification
-would be to invent a unified proof script (input) language and
-proof-state (output) language for theorem provers. The Proof General
-experience could provide useful insight into such a project. We'd be
-interested to hear from workers interested in collaborating in this
-area.
-
-Moreover, by implementing your user-interface ideas in the Proof
-General framework, your contributions automatically reach a large
-community of both novice and expert proof assistant users.
-
+drive them. Moreover, by implementing your user-interface ideas in
+the Proof General framework, your contributions automatically reach a
+large community of both novice and expert proof assistant users.
+
+An obvious avenue towards further and easier unification would be to
+invent a unified proof script (input) language and proof-state
+(output) language for theorem provers. The Proof General experience
+could provide useful insight into such a project. We'd be interested
+to hear from workers interested in collaborating in this area.
-- David Aspinall & Thomas Kleymann
(Please contact via proofgen@dcs.ed.ac.uk)