diff options
author | David Aspinall <da@inf.ed.ac.uk> | 1999-10-19 15:37:40 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | David Aspinall <da@inf.ed.ac.uk> | 1999-10-19 15:37:40 +0000 |
commit | 9ea34be1127204e1555efc02e874b1aa16fb268e (patch) | |
tree | 19909923d7ccd1dd53548272ede171f789dc3c15 | |
parent | fa480162d4745f204a08017ffaed89ad88831fbf (diff) |
Issues added after report from DvO.
-rw-r--r-- | todo | 19 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 1 deletions
@@ -49,7 +49,24 @@ re-enabled), proof-toggle-scripting, new configuration options. - more 3.0 issues: extending the queue region, being more lax about proof-shell-busy. - Fix sentinel infinite loop bug - + - noticeable delay when loading ML files for Isabelle (fontification?) + +A Nested error problem: conceptually, activate scripting should fail + if the hook function which causes loading of more files (for isabelle) + fails. Maybe fix by adding a new piece of state: + "proof-shell-error-flagged". + +D Usability for Isabelle QED message. + Why does the 'no subgoals' proofstate+message appear in the response + buffer? I'd say it should appear at least in the goals buffer, as this + is the place where I expect the proofstate, and if it disappears, I + always get the impression that something has gone wrong. I don't mind + if it appears in the response buffer additionally. + I think the conceptual argument is that it isn't any more + a list of goals, so any special stuff (proof by pointing) is not + applicable. The other assistants just say something trivial like + "QED!" which is more justifiably a response. + D Investigate possible toolbar refresh problems. Are extra clicks ever needed? Wait for some comments. |