diff options
| author |  arpi <arpi@b3059339-0415-0410-9bf9-f77b7e298cf2> | 2001-11-14 22:29:55 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | arpi <arpi@b3059339-0415-0410-9bf9-f77b7e298cf2> | 2001-11-14 22:29:55 +0000 |
| commit | 113336b4c373097e266c18526c8a1e2a95a5733f (patch) | |
| tree | 7d4014ef61bbb26d0341cac7b7ef6c4e3911f14f | |
| parent | b8a80b1134a74014453f7ff988a04d51df3261c6 (diff) | |
updated. pipe bug not yet fixed
git-svn-id: svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/mplayer/trunk@2910 b3059339-0415-0410-9bf9-f77b7e298cf2
| -rw-r--r-- | DOCS/gcc-2.96-3.0.html | 6 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/DOCS/gcc-2.96-3.0.html b/DOCS/gcc-2.96-3.0.html index c129188f80..f745f8b5de 100644 --- a/DOCS/gcc-2.96-3.0.html +++ b/DOCS/gcc-2.96-3.0.html @@ -42,10 +42,8 @@ We simply has no interest and time to do it. <P> Ah, and about the pipe-in-comment bug: it wasn't really our bug. I've talked one of gcc maintainers, and he told me that gcc 2.96 and 3.x -supports intel asm syntax, and it caused the pipe bug. But it was a bug, -because gcc silently, without any warning, ignored the whole asm block. -<I>They</I> have fixed that, now it prints warning and doesn't skip the block. -(at least he told me, i didn't checked) +supports intel asm syntax, and it caused the pipe bug. But it <I>is</I> a bug, +because gcc <I>silently</I>, without any warning, ignored the whole asm block! </P> <P> |