aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
path: root/vendor/github.com/tdewolff/minify/benchmarks/sample_blogpost.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'vendor/github.com/tdewolff/minify/benchmarks/sample_blogpost.html')
-rw-r--r--vendor/github.com/tdewolff/minify/benchmarks/sample_blogpost.html580
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 580 deletions
diff --git a/vendor/github.com/tdewolff/minify/benchmarks/sample_blogpost.html b/vendor/github.com/tdewolff/minify/benchmarks/sample_blogpost.html
deleted file mode 100644
index f0b977f..0000000
--- a/vendor/github.com/tdewolff/minify/benchmarks/sample_blogpost.html
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,580 +0,0 @@
-<!DOCTYPE html>
-<html>
- <head>
- <meta charset="UTF-8">
- <title>research!rsc: My Go Resolutions for 2017</title>
- <link rel="alternate" type="application/atom+xml" title="research!rsc - Atom" href="http://research.swtch.com/feed.atom" />
-
-<link href='https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Inconsolata:400,700' rel='stylesheet' type='text/css'>
-<script type="text/javascript" src="https://use.typekit.com/skm6yij.js"></script>
-<script type="text/javascript">try{Typekit.load();}catch(e){}</script>
-<style>
- body {
- padding: 0;
- margin: 0;
- font-size: 100%;
- }
- .header {
- height: 1.25em;
- background-color: #dff;
- margin: 0;
- padding: 0.1em 0.1em 0.2em;
- border-top: 1px solid black;
- border-bottom: 1px solid #8ff;
- }
- .header h3 {
- margin: 0;
- padding: 0 2em;
- display: inline-block;
- padding-right: 2em;
- font-style: italic;
- font-family: "adobe-text-pro" !important;
- font-size: 90%;
- }
- .rss {
- float: right;
- padding-top: 0.2em;
- padding-right: 2em;
- display: none;
- }
- .toc {
- margin-top: 2em;
- }
- .toc-title {
- font-family: "caflisch-script-pro";
- font-size: 300%;
- line-height: 50%;
- }
- .toc-subtitle {
- display: block;
- margin-bottom: 1em;
- font-size: 83%;
- }
- @media only screen and (max-width: 550px) { .toc-subtitle { display: none; } }
- .header h3 a {
- color: black;
- }
- .header h4 {
- margin: 0;
- padding: 0;
- display: inline-block;
- font-weight: normal;
- font-size: 83%;
- }
- @media only screen and (max-width: 550px) { .header h4 { display: none; } }
- .main {
- padding: 0 2em;
- }
- @media only screen and (max-width: 479px) { .article { font-size: 120%; } }
- .article h1 {
- text-align: center;
- }
- .article h1, .article h2, .article h3 {
- font-family: 'Myriad Pro';
- }
- .normal {
- font-size: medium;
- font-weight: normal;
- }
- .when {
- text-align: center;
- font-size: 100%;
- margin: 0;
- padding: 0;
- }
- .when p {
- margin: 0;
- padding: 0;
- }
- .article h2 {
- font-size: 100%;
- padding-top: 0.25em;
- }
- pre {
- margin-left: 4em;
- margin-right: 4em;
- }
- pre, code {
- font-family: 'Inconsolata', monospace;
- font-size: 100%;
- }
- .footer {
- margin-top: 10px;
- font-size: 83%;
- font-family: sans-serif;
- }
- .comments {
- margin-top: 2em;
- background-color: #ffe;
- border-top: 1px solid #aa4;
- border-left: 1px solid #aa4;
- border-right: 1px solid #aa4;
- }
- .comments-header {
- padding: 0 5px 0 5px;
- }
- .comments-header p {
- padding: 0;
- margin: 3px 0 0 0;
- }
- .comments-body {
- padding: 5px 5px 5px 5px;
- }
- #plus-comments {
- border-bottom: 1px dotted #ccc;
- }
- .plus-comment {
- width: 100%;
- font-size: 14px;
- border-top: 1px dotted #ccc;
- }
- .me {
- background-color: #eec;
- }
- .plus-comment ul {
- margin: 0;
- padding: 0;
- list-style: none;
- width: 100%;
- display: inline-block;
- }
- .comment-when {
- color:#999;
- width:auto;
- padding:0 5px;
- }
- .old {
- font-size: 83%;
- }
- .plus-comment ul li {
- display: inline-block;
- vertical-align: top;
- margin-top: 5px;
- margin-bottom: 5px;
- padding: 0;
- }
- .plus-icon {
- width: 45px;
- }
- .plus-img {
- float: left;
- margin: 4px 4px 4px 4px;
- width: 32px;
- height: 32px;
- }
- .plus-comment p {
- margin: 0;
- padding: 0;
- }
- .plus-clear {
- clear: left;
- }
- .toc-when {
- font-size: 83%;
- color: #ccc;
- }
- .toc {
- list-style: none;
- }
- .toc li {
- margin-bottom: 0.5em;
- }
- .toc-head {
- margin-bottom: 1em !important;
- font-size: 117%;
- }
- .toc-summary {
- margin-left: 2em;
- }
- .favorite {
- font-weight: bold;
- }
- .article p {
- line-height: 144%;
- }
- sup, sub {
- vertical-align: baseline;
- position: relative;
- font-size: 83%;
- }
- sup {
- bottom: 1ex;
- }
- sub {
- top: 0.8ex;
- }
-
- .main {
- position: relative;
- margin: 0 auto;
- padding: 0;
- width: 900px;
- }
- @media only screen and (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 959px) { .main { width: 708px; } }
- @media only screen and (min-width: 640px) and (max-width: 767px) { .main { width: 580px; } }
- @media only screen and (min-width: 480px) and (max-width: 639px) { .main { width: 420px; } }
- @media only screen and (max-width: 479px) { .main { width: 300px; } }
-
-</style>
-
- </head>
- <body>
-
-<div class="header">
- <h3><a href="/">research!rsc</a></h3>
- <h4>Thoughts and links about programming,
- by <a href="https://swtch.com/~rsc/" rel="author">Russ Cox</a> </h4>
- <a class="rss" href="/feed.atom"><img src="/feed-icon-14x14.png" /></a>
-</div>
-
- <div class="main">
- <div class="article">
- <h1>My Go Resolutions for 2017
- <div class="normal">
- <div class="when">
-
- Posted on Wednesday, January 18, 2017.
-
-
- </div>
- </div>
- </h1>
- <p class=lp>’Tis the season for resolutions,
-and I thought it would make sense to write a little
-about what I hope to work on this year as far as Go is concerned.</p>
-
-<p class=pp>My goal every year is to <em>help Go developers</em>.
-I want to make sure that the work we do on the Go team
-has a significant, positive impact on Go developers.
-That may sound obvious, but there are a variety of common ways to fail to achieve that:
-for example, spending too much time cleaning up or optimizing code that doesn’t need it;
-responding only to the most common or recent complaints or requests;
-or focusing too much on short-term improvements.
-It’s important to step back and make sure we’re focusing
-our development work where it does the most good.</p>
-
-<p class=pp>This post outlines a few of my own major focuses for this year.
-This is only my personal list, not the Go team’s list.</p>
-
-<p class=pp>One reason for posting this is to gather feedback.
-If these spark any ideas or suggestions of your own,
-please feel free to comment below or on the linked GitHub issues.</p>
-
-<p class=pp>Another reason is to make clear that I’m aware of these issues as important.
-I think too often people interpret lack of action by the Go team
-as a signal that we think everything is perfect, when instead
-there is simply other, higher priority work to do first.</p>
-
-<h2><a name="alias"></a>Type aliases</h2>
-
-<p class=lp>There is a recurring problem with moving types
-from one package to another during large codebase refactorings.
-We tried to solve it last year with <a href="https://golang.org/issue/16339">general aliases</a>,
-which didn’t work for at least two reasons: we didn’t explain the change well enough,
-and we didn’t deliver it on time, so it wasn’t ready for Go 1.8.
-Learning from that experience,
-I <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6Cw9iCDVcU">gave a talk</a>
-and <a href="https://talks.golang.org/2016/refactor.article">wrote an article</a>
-about the underlying problem,
-and that started a <a href="https://golang.org/issue/18130">productive discussion</a>
-on the Go issue tracker about the solution space.
-It looks like more limited <a href="https://golang.org/design/18130-type-alias">type aliases</a>
-are the right next step.
-I want to make sure those land smoothly in Go 1.9. <a href="https://golang.org/issue/18130">#18130</a>.</p>
-
-<h2><a name="package"></a>Package management</h2>
-
-<p class=lp>I designed the Go support for downloading published packages
-(“goinstall”, which became “go get”) in February 2010.
-A lot has happened since then.
-In particular, other language ecosystems have really raised the bar
-for what people expect from package management,
-and the open source world has mostly agreed on
-<a href="http://semver.org/">semantic versioning</a>, which provides a useful base
-for inferring version compatibility.
-Go needs to do better here, and a group of contributors have been
-<a href="https://blog.gopheracademy.com/advent-2016/saga-go-dependency-management/">working on a solution</a>.
-I want to make sure these ideas are integrated well
-into the standard Go toolchain and to make package management
-a reason that people love Go.</p>
-
-<h2><a name="build"></a>Build improvements</h2>
-
-<p class=lp>There are a handful of shortcomings in the design of
-the go command’s build system that are overdue to be fixed.
-Here are three representative examples that I intend to
-address with a bit of a redesign of the internals of the go command.</p>
-
-<p class=pp>Builds can be too slow,
-because the go command doesn’t cache build results as aggressively as it should.
-Many people don’t realize that <code>go</code> <code>install</code> saves its work while <code>go</code> <code>build</code> does not,
-and then they run repeated <code>go</code> <code>build</code> commands that are slow
-because the later builds do more work than they should need to.
-The same for repeated <code>go</code> <code>test</code> without <code>go</code> <code>test</code> <code>-i</code> when dependencies are modified.
-All builds should be as incremental as possible.
-<a href="https://golang.org/issue/4719">#4719</a>.</p>
-
-<p class=pp>Test results should be cached too:
-if none of the inputs to a test have changed,
-then usually there is no need to rerun the test.
-This will make it very cheap to run “all tests” when little or nothing has changed.
-<a href="https://golang.org/issue/11193">#11193</a>.</p>
-
-<p class=pp>Work outside GOPATH should be supported nearly as well
-as work inside GOPATH.
-In particular, it should be possible to <code>git</code> <code>clone</code> a repo,
-<code>cd</code> into it, and run <code>go</code> commands and have them work fine.
-Package management only makes that more important:
-you’ll need to be able to work on different versions of a package (say, v1 and v2)
-without having entirely separate GOPATHs for them.
-<a href="https://golang.org/issue/17271">#17271</a>.</p>
-
-<h2><a name="corpus"></a>Code corpus</h2>
-
-<p class=lp>I think it helped to have concrete examples from real projects
-in the talk and article I prepared about codebase refactoring (see <a href="#alias">above</a>).
-We&rsquo;ve also defined that <a href="https://golang.org/src/cmd/vet/README">additions to vet</a>
-must target problems that happen frequently in real programs.
-I&rsquo;d like to see that kind of analysis of actual practice—examining
-the effects on and possible improvements to real programs—become a
-standard way we discuss and evaluate changes to Go.</p>
-
-<p class=pp>Right now there&rsquo;s not an agreed-upon representative corpus of code to use for
-those analyses: everyone must first create their own, which is too much work.
-I&rsquo;d like to put together a single, self-contained Git repo people can check out that
-contains our official baseline corpus for those analyses.
-A possible starting point could be the top 100 Go language repos
-on GitHub by stars or forks or both.</p>
-
-<h2><a name="vet"></a>Automatic vet</h2>
-
-<p class=lp>The Go distribution ships with this powerful tool,
-<a href="https://golang.org/cmd/vet/"><code>go</code> <code>vet</code></a>,
-that points out correctness bugs.
-We have a high bar for checks, so that when vet speaks, you should listen.
-But everyone has to remember to run it.
-It would be better if you didn’t have to remember.
-In particular, I think we could probably run vet
-in parallel with the final compile and link of the test binary
-during <code>go</code> <code>test</code> without slowing the compile-edit-test cycle at all.
-If we can do that, and if we limit the enabled vet checks to a subset
-that is essentially 100% accurate,
-we can make passing vet a precondition for running a test at all.
-Then developers don’t need to remember to run <code>go</code> <code>vet</code>.
-They run <code>go</code> <code>test</code>,
-and once in a while vet speaks up with something important
-and avoids a debugging session.
-<a href="https://golang.org/issue/18084">#18084</a>,
-<a href="https://golang.org/issue/18085">#18085</a>.</p>
-
-<h2><a name="error"></a>Errors &amp; best practices</h2>
-
-<p class=lp>Part of the intended contract for error reporting in Go is that functions
-include relevant available context, including the operation being attempted
-(such as the function name and its arguments).
-For example, this program:</p>
-
-<pre><code>err := os.Remove(&quot;/tmp/nonexist&quot;)
-fmt.Println(err)
-</code></pre>
-
-<p class=lp>prints this output:</p>
-
-<pre><code>remove /tmp/nonexist: no such file or directory
-</code></pre>
-
-<p class=lp>Not enough Go code adds context like <code>os.Remove</code> does. Too much code does only</p>
-
-<pre><code>if err != nil {
- return err
-}
-</code></pre>
-
-<p class=lp>all the way up the call stack,
-discarding useful context that should be reported
-(like <code>remove</code> <code>/tmp/nonexist:</code> above).
-I would like to try to understand whether our expectations
-for including context are wrong, or if there is something
-we can do to make it easier to write code that returns better errors.</p>
-
-<p class=pp>There are also various discussions in the community about
-agreed-upon interfaces for stripping error context.
-I would like to try to understand when that makes sense and
-whether we should adopt an official recommendation.</p>
-
-<h2><a name="context"></a>Context &amp; best practices</h2>
-
-<p class=lp>We added the new <a href="https://golang.org/pkg/context/">context package</a>
-in Go 1.7 for holding request-scoped information like
-<a href="https://blog.golang.org/context">timeouts, cancellation state, and credentials</a>.
-An individual context is immutable (like an individual string or int):
-it is only possible to derive a new, updated context and
-pass that context explicitly further down the call stack or
-(less commonly) back up to the caller.
-The context is now carried through APIs such as
-<a href="https://golang.org/pkg/database/sql">database/sql</a>
-and
-<a href="https://golang.org/pkg/net/http">net/http</a>,
-mainly so that those can stop processing a request when the caller
-is no longer interested in the result.
-Timeout information is appropriate to carry in a context,
-but—to use a <a href="https://golang.org/issue/18284">real example we removed</a>—database options
-are not, because they are unlikely to apply equally well to all possible
-database operations carried out during a request.
-What about the current clock source, or logging sink?
-Is either of those appropriate to store in a context?
-I would like to try to understand and characterize the
-criteria for what is and is not an appropriate use of context.</p>
-
-<h2><a name="memory"></a>Memory model</h2>
-
-<p class=lp>Go’s <a href="https://golang.org/ref/mem">memory model</a> is intentionally low-key,
-making few promises to users, compared to other languages.
-In fact it starts by discouraging people from reading the rest of the document.
-At the same time, it demands more of the compiler than other languages:
-in particular, a race on an integer value is not sufficient license
-for your program to misbehave in arbitrary ways.
-But there are some complete gaps, in particular no mention of
-the <a href="https://golang.org/pkg/sync/atomic/">sync/atomic package</a>.
-I think the core compiler and runtime developers all agree
-that the behavior of those atomics should be roughly the same as
-C++ seqcst atomics or Java volatiles,
-but we still need to write that down carefully in the memory model,
-and probably also in a long blog post.
-<a href="https://golang.org/issue/5045">#5045</a>,
-<a href="https://golang.org/issue/7948">#7948</a>,
-<a href="https://golang.org/issue/9442">#9442</a>.</p>
-
-<h2><a name="immutability"></a>Immutability</h2>
-
-<p class=lp>The <a href="https://golang.org/doc/articles/race_detector.html">race detector</a>
-is one of Go’s most loved features.
-But not having races would be even better.
-I would love it if there were some reasonable way to integrate
-<a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=%22reference+immutability%22">reference immutability</a> into Go,
-so that programmers can make clear, checked assertions about what can and cannot
-be written and thereby eliminate certain races at compile time.
-Go already has one immutable type, <code>string</code>; it would
-be nice to retroactively define that
-<code>string</code> is a named type (or type alias) for <code>immutable</code> <code>[]byte</code>.
-I don’t think that will happen this year,
-but I’d like to understand the solution space better.
-Javari, Midori, Pony, and Rust have all staked out interesting points
-in the solution space, and there are plenty of research papers
-beyond those.</p>
-
-<p class=pp>In the long-term, if we could statically eliminate the possibility of races,
-that would eliminate the need for most of the memory model.
-That may well be an impossible dream,
-but again I’d like to understand the solution space better.</p>
-
-<h2><a name="generics"></a>Generics</h2>
-
-<p class=lp>Nothing sparks more <a href="https://research.swtch.com/dogma">heated arguments</a>
-among Go and non-Go developers than the question of whether Go should
-have support for generics (or how many years ago that should have happened).
-I don’t believe the Go team has ever said “Go does not need generics.”
-What we <em>have</em> said is that there are higher-priority issues facing Go.
-For example, I believe that better support for package management
-would have a much larger immediate positive impact on most Go developers
-than adding generics.
-But we do certainly understand that for a certain subset of Go use cases,
-the lack of parametric polymorphism is a significant hindrance.</p>
-
-<p class=pp>Personally, I would like to be able to write general channel-processing
-functions like:</p>
-
-<pre><code>// Join makes all messages received on the input channels
-// available for receiving from the returned channel.
-func Join(inputs ...&lt;-chan T) &lt;-chan T
-
-// Dup duplicates messages received on c to both c1 and c2.
-func Dup(c &lt;-chan T) (c1, c2 &lt;-chan T)
-</code></pre>
-
-<p class=lp>I would also like to be able to write
-Go support for high-level data processing abstractions,
-analogous to
-<a href="https://research.google.com/pubs/archive/35650.pdf">FlumeJava</a> or
-C#’s <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_Integrated_Query">LINQ</a>,
-in a way that catches type errors at compile time instead of at run time.
-There are also any number of data structures or generic algorithms
-that might be written,
-but I personally find these broader applications more compelling.</p>
-
-<p class=pp>We’ve <a href="https://research.swtch.com/generic">struggled</a> off and on
-<a href="https://golang.org/design/15292-generics">for years</a>
-to find the right way to add generics to Go.
-At least a few of the past proposals got hung up on trying to design
-something that provided both general parametric polymorphism
-(like <code>chan</code> <code>T</code>) and also a unification of <code>string</code> and <code>[]byte</code>.
-If the latter is handled by parameterization over immutability,
-as described in the previous section, then maybe that simplifies
-the demands on a design for generics.</p>
-
-<p class=pp>When I first started thinking about generics for Go in 2008,
-the main examples to learn from were C#, Java, Haskell, and ML.
-None of the approaches in those languages seemed like a
-perfect fit for Go.
-Today, there are newer attempts to learn from as well,
-including Dart, Midori, Rust, and Swift.</p>
-
-<p class=pp>It’s been a few years since we ventured out and explored the design space.
-It is probably time to look around again,
-especially in light of the insight about mutability and
-the additional examples set by newer languages.
-I don’t think generics will happen this year,
-but I’d like to be able to say I understand the solution space better.</p>
-
- </div>
-
-
- <div id="disqus_thread"></div>
- <script>
- var disqus_config = function () {
- this.page.url = "https://research.swtch.com/go2017";
- this.page.identifier = "blog/go2017";
- };
- (function() {
- var d = document, s = d.createElement('script');
- s.src = '//swtch.disqus.com/embed.js';
- s.setAttribute('data-timestamp', +new Date());
- (d.head || d.body).appendChild(s);
- })();
- </script>
- <noscript>Please enable JavaScript to view the <a href="https://disqus.com/?ref_noscript">comments powered by Disqus.</a></noscript>
- </div>
-
- </div>
-
-
-<script type="text/javascript">
-var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
-document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
-</script>
-<script type="text/javascript">
-var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-3319603-2");
-pageTracker._initData();
-pageTracker._trackPageview();
-</script>
-
-
-
- </body>
-</html>
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-