aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
path: root/src/core/ext/filters/client_channel
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/core/ext/filters/client_channel')
-rw-r--r--src/core/ext/filters/client_channel/client_channel.c18
-rw-r--r--src/core/ext/filters/client_channel/lb_policy/grpclb/grpclb.c8
2 files changed, 12 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/src/core/ext/filters/client_channel/client_channel.c b/src/core/ext/filters/client_channel/client_channel.c
index 8d28e829d8..0463b25412 100644
--- a/src/core/ext/filters/client_channel/client_channel.c
+++ b/src/core/ext/filters/client_channel/client_channel.c
@@ -400,26 +400,24 @@ static void on_resolver_result_changed_locked(grpc_exec_ctx *exec_ctx,
GPR_ASSERT(channel_arg->type == GRPC_ARG_STRING);
lb_policy_name = channel_arg->value.string;
}
- // Special case: If all of the addresses are balancer addresses,
- // assume that we should use the grpclb policy, regardless of what the
- // resolver actually specified.
+ // Special case: If at least one balancer address is present, we use
+ // the grpclb policy, regardless of what the resolver actually specified.
channel_arg =
grpc_channel_args_find(chand->resolver_result, GRPC_ARG_LB_ADDRESSES);
if (channel_arg != NULL && channel_arg->type == GRPC_ARG_POINTER) {
grpc_lb_addresses *addresses = channel_arg->value.pointer.p;
- bool found_backend_address = false;
+ bool found_balancer_address = false;
for (size_t i = 0; i < addresses->num_addresses; ++i) {
- if (!addresses->addresses[i].is_balancer) {
- found_backend_address = true;
+ if (addresses->addresses[i].is_balancer) {
+ found_balancer_address = true;
break;
}
}
- if (!found_backend_address) {
+ if (found_balancer_address) {
if (lb_policy_name != NULL && strcmp(lb_policy_name, "grpclb") != 0) {
gpr_log(GPR_INFO,
- "resolver requested LB policy %s but provided only balancer "
- "addresses, no backend addresses -- forcing use of grpclb LB "
- "policy",
+ "resolver requested LB policy %s but provided at least one "
+ "balancer address -- forcing use of grpclb LB policy",
lb_policy_name);
}
lb_policy_name = "grpclb";
diff --git a/src/core/ext/filters/client_channel/lb_policy/grpclb/grpclb.c b/src/core/ext/filters/client_channel/lb_policy/grpclb/grpclb.c
index f8524732df..ad5f0685ec 100644
--- a/src/core/ext/filters/client_channel/lb_policy/grpclb/grpclb.c
+++ b/src/core/ext/filters/client_channel/lb_policy/grpclb/grpclb.c
@@ -831,10 +831,10 @@ static grpc_lb_policy *glb_create(grpc_exec_ctx *exec_ctx,
/* Count the number of gRPC-LB addresses. There must be at least one.
* TODO(roth): For now, we ignore non-balancer addresses, but in the
* future, we may change the behavior such that we fall back to using
- * the non-balancer addresses if we cannot reach any balancers. At that
- * time, this should be changed to allow a list with no balancer addresses,
- * since the resolver might fail to return a balancer address even when
- * this is the right LB policy to use. */
+ * the non-balancer addresses if we cannot reach any balancers. In the
+ * fallback case, we should use the LB policy indicated by
+ * GRPC_ARG_LB_POLICY_NAME (although if that specifies grpclb or is
+ * unset, we should default to pick_first). */
const grpc_arg *arg =
grpc_channel_args_find(args->args, GRPC_ARG_LB_ADDRESSES);
if (arg == NULL || arg->type != GRPC_ARG_POINTER) {