1 files changed, 70 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/health-checking.md b/doc/health-checking.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..0b3f9c6a03
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/health-checking.md
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+GRPC Health Checking Protocol
+================================
+
+Health checks are used to probe whether the server is able to handle rpcs. The
+client-to-server health checking can happen from point to point or via some
+control system. A server may choose to reply “unhealthy” because it
+is not ready to take requests, it is shutting down or some other reason.
+The client can act accordingly if the response is not received within some time
+window or the response says unhealthy in it.
+
+
+A GRPC service is used as the health checking mechanism for both simple
+client-to-server scenario and other control systems such as load-balancing.
+Being a high
+level service provides some benefits. Firstly, since it is a GRPC service
+itself, doing a health check is in the same format as a normal rpc. Secondly,
+it has rich semantics such as per-service health status. Thirdly, as a GRPC
+service, it is able reuse all the existing billing, quota infrastructure, etc,
+and thus the server has full control over the access of the health checking
+service.
+
+## Service Definition
+
+The server should export a service defined in the following proto:
+
+```
+syntax = "proto3";
+
+package grpc.health.v1alpha;
+
+message HealthCheckRequest {
+  string service = 1;
+}
+
+message HealthCheckResponse {
+  enum ServingStatus {
+    UNKNOWN = 0;
+    SERVING = 1;
+    NOT_SERVING = 2;
+  }
+  ServingStatus status = 1;
+}
+
+service Health {
+  rpc Check(HealthCheckRequest) returns (HealthCheckResponse);
+}
+```
+
+A client can query the server’s health status by calling the `Check` method, and
+a deadline should be set on the rpc. The client can optionally set the service
+name it wants to query for health status. The suggested format of service name
+is `package_names.ServiceName`, such as `grpc.health.v1alpha.Health`.
+
+The server should register all the services manually and set
+the individual status, including an empty service name and its status. For each
+request received, if the service name can be found in the registry,
+a response must be sent back with an `OK` status and the status field should be
+set to `SERVING` or `NOT_SERVING` accordingly. If the service name is not
+registered, the server returns a `NOT_FOUND` GRPC status.
+
+The server should use an empty string as the key for server’s
+overall health status, so that a client not interested in a specific service can
+query the server's status with an empty request. The server can just do exact
+matching of the service name without support of any kind of wildcard matching.
+However, the service owner has the freedom to implement more complicated
+matching semantics that both the client and server agree upon.
+
+A client can declare the server as unhealthy if the rpc is not finished after
+some amount of time. The client should be able to handle the case where server
+does not have the Health service.