aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
path: root/doc/cpp-style-guide.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/cpp-style-guide.md')
-rw-r--r--doc/cpp-style-guide.md91
1 files changed, 91 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/cpp-style-guide.md b/doc/cpp-style-guide.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..0138ceb737
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/cpp-style-guide.md
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+GRPC C++ STYLE GUIDE
+=====================
+
+Background
+----------
+
+Here we document style rules for C++ usage in the gRPC C++ bindings
+and tests.
+
+General
+-------
+
+- The majority of gRPC's C++ requirements are drawn from the [Google C++ style
+guide] (https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html)
+ - However, gRPC has some additional requirements to maintain
+ [portability] (#portability)
+- As in C, layout rules are defined by clang-format, and all code
+should be passed through clang-format. A (docker-based) script to do
+so is included in [tools/distrib/clang\_format\_code.sh]
+(../tools/distrib/clang_format_code.sh).
+
+<a name="portability"></a>
+Portability Restrictions
+-------------------
+
+gRPC supports a large number of compilers, ranging from those that are
+missing many key C++11 features to those that have quite detailed
+analysis. As a result, gRPC compiles with a high level of warnings and
+treat all warnings as errors. gRPC also forbids the use of some common
+C++11 constructs. Here are some guidelines, to be extended as needed:
+- Do not use range-based for. Expressions of the form
+ ```c
+ for (auto& i: vec) {
+ // code
+ }
+ ```
+
+ are not allowed and should be replaced with code such as
+ ```c
+ for (auto it = vec.begin; it != vec.end(); it++) {
+ auto& i = *it;
+ // code
+ }
+ ```
+
+- Do not use lambda of any kind (no capture, explicit capture, or
+default capture). Other C++ functional features such as
+`std::function` or `std::bind` are allowed
+- Do not use brace-list initializers.
+- Do not compare a pointer to `nullptr` . This is because gcc 4.4
+ does not support `nullptr` directly and gRPC implements a subset of
+ its features in [include/grpc++/impl/codegen/config.h]
+ (../include/grpc++/impl/codegen/config.h). Instead, pointers should
+ be checked for validity using their implicit conversion to `bool`.
+ In other words, use `if (p)` rather than `if (p != nullptr)`
+- Do not initialize global/static pointer variables to `nullptr`. Just let
+ the compiler implicitly initialize them to `nullptr` (which it will
+ definitely do). The reason is that `nullptr` is an actual object in
+ our implementation rather than just a constant pointer value, so
+ static/global constructors will be called in a potentially
+ undesirable sequence.
+- Do not use `final` or `override` as these are not supported by some
+ compilers. Instead use `GRPC_FINAL` and `GRPC_OVERRIDE` . These
+ compile down to the traditional C++ forms for compilers that support
+ them but are just elided if the compiler does not support those features.
+- In the [include] (../../../tree/master/include/grpc++) and [src]
+ (../../../tree/master/src/cpp) directory trees, you should also not
+ use certain STL objects like `std::mutex`, `std::lock_guard`,
+ `std::unique_lock`, `std::nullptr`, `std::thread` . Instead, use
+ `grpc::mutex`, `grpc::lock_guard`, etc., which are gRPC
+ implementations of the prominent features of these objects that are
+ not always available. You can use the `std` versions of those in [test]
+ (../../../tree/master/test/cpp)
+- Similarly, in the same directories, do not use `std::chrono` unless
+ it is guarded by `#ifndef GRPC_CXX0X_NO_CHRONO` . For platforms that
+ lack`std::chrono,` there is a C-language timer called gpr_timespec that can
+ be used instead.
+- `std::unique_ptr` must be used with extreme care in any kind of
+ collection. For example `vector<std::unique_ptr>` does not work in
+ gcc 4.4 if the vector is constructed to its full size at
+ initialization but does work if elements are added to the vector
+ using functions like `push_back`. `map` and other pair-based
+ collections do not work with `unique_ptr` under gcc 4.4. The issue
+ is that many of these collection implementations assume a copy
+ constructor
+ to be available.
+- Don't use `std::this_thread` . Use `gpr_sleep_until` for sleeping a thread.
+- [Some adjacent character combinations cause problems]
+ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digraphs_and_trigraphs#C). If declaring a
+ template against some class relative to the global namespace,
+ `<::name` will be non-portable. Separate the `<` from the `:` and use `< ::name`.