blob: 0ab113211e3baa39fde82dd99d6e14ed5b9daaeb (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
|
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawl9sYlePmv1xK-VvjBdN-5doOa_Xw-jH4U"
nickname="Richard"
subject="comment 1"
date="2011-04-17T23:46:37Z"
content="""
--to and --from seem to have different semantics than --source and --destination. Subtle, but still different.
That being said, I am not sure --from and --to are needed at all. Calling the local repo . and all remotes by their name, they are arguably redundant and removing them would make the syntax a lot prettier; mv and cp don't need them, either.
I am not sure changing syntax at this point is considered good style though personally, I wouldn't mind adapting and would actually prefer it over using --to and --from.
-v and -q would be nice.
Richard
"""]]
|
