Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | |
---|---|---|---|
* | https://support.box.com/hc/communities/public/questions/200261028-Does-Box-s ↵ | 2013-11-28 | |
| | | | | upport-FTP-or-WebDAV- | ||
* | update docs for changed initremote encryption syntax | 2013-09-04 | |
| | |||
* | drop webdav compatability with the directory special remote etc | 2012-11-16 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | The benefit of using a compatable directory structure does not outweigh the cost in complexity of handling the multiple locations content can be stored in directory special remotes. And this also allows doing away with the parent directories, which can't be made unwritable in DAV, so have no benefit there. This will save 2 http calls per file store. But, kept the directory hashing, just in case. | ||
* | fixie | 2012-06-07 | |
| | |||
* | Formatting | 2012-03-12 | |
| | |||
* | foo | 2012-03-04 | |
| | |||
* | tweak davfs2 settings | 2012-03-04 | |
| | |||
* | box.com seems to behave better with smaller chunks | 2012-03-04 | |
| | | | | | Seeing some weird failures in the davfs2 or box.com layer with 100 mb chunks. | ||
* | instructions for using Box.com as a special remote | 2012-03-04 | |
I was sucked in by the 50 gb free lifetime storage offer. Happily, it was pretty easy to get it to work with git-annex. |