| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also deletes any tagged pushes that the assistant might have done,
since those would also prevent resetting a branch back.
This commit was sponsored by andrea rota.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Not yet handled by sync or assistant.
This commit was sponsored by Nick Daly on Patreon.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Added annex.resolvemerge configuration, which can be set to false to
disable the usual automatic merge conflict resolution done by git-annex
sync and the assistant.
* sync: Added --no-resolvemerge option.
Note that disabling merge conflict resolution is probably not a good idea
in a direct mode repo or adjusted branch. Since updates to both are done
outside the usual work tree, if it fails the tree is not left in a
conflicted state, and it would be hard to manually resolve the conflict.
Still, made annex.resolvemerge be supported in those cases for consistency.
This commit was sponsored by Riku Voipio.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The former can be useful to make remotes that don't get fully synced with
local changes, which comes up in a lot of situations.
The latter was mostly added for symmetry, but could be useful (though less
likely to be).
Implementing `remote.<name>.annex-pull` was a bit tricky, as there's no one
place where git-annex pulls/fetches from remotes. I audited all
instances of "fetch" and "pull". A few cases were left not checking this
config:
* Git.Repair can try to pull missing refs from a remote, and if the local
repo is corrupted, that seems a reasonable thing to do even though
the config would normally prevent it.
* Assistant.WebApp.Gpg and Remote.Gcrypt and Remote.Git do fetches
as part of the setup process of a remote. The config would probably not
be set then, and having the setup fail seems worse than honoring it if it
is already set.
I have not prevented all the code that does a "merge" from merging branches
from remotes with remote.<name>.annex-pull=false. That could perhaps
be done, but it would need a way to map from branch name to remote name,
and the way refspecs work makes that hard to get really correct. So if the
user fetches manually, the git-annex branch will get merged, for example.
Anther way of looking at/justifying this is that the setting is called
"annex-pull", not "annex-merge".
This commit was supported by the NSF-funded DataLad project.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For when you want to sync only some files' contents, not the whole working
tree.
This commit was sponsored by Anthony DeRobertis on Patreon.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
.. which can be set to true to make git annex sync default to --content.
This may become the default at some point in the future.
As well as being configuable by git config, it can be configured by
git-annex config to control the default behavior in all clones of a
repository.
Had to add a separate --no-content switch to we can tell if it's been
explicitly set, and should override annex.synccontent. If --content was the
default, this complication would not be necessary.
This commit was sponsored by Jake Vosloo on Patreon.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Any config names can be set using this; git-annex commands will only look
at specific ones that make sense and are worth the overhead of querying the
branch.
This might also be useful for storing whatever other config-type stuff the
user might want to shove into the git-annex branch.
This commit was sponsored by Jochen Bartl on Patreon.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
sync process, as well as supporting --commit, --pull, --push, and --no-content options to specify the (current) default behavior.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
* sync: Support --jobs
* sync --content: Avoid unnecessary second pull from remotes when
no file transfers are made.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
i found that most man pages only had references to the main git-annex
manpage, which i stillfind pretty huge and hard to navigate through.
i tried to sift through all the man pages and add cross-references
between relevant pages. my general rule of thumb is that links should
be both ways unless one of the pages is a more general page that would
become ridiculously huge if all backlinks would be added
(git-annex-preferred-content comes to mind).
i have also make the links one per line as this is how it was done in
the metadata pages so far.
i did everything but the plumbing, utility and test commands, although
some of those are linked from the other commands so cross-links were
added there as well.
|
|
|
Common command man pages all split out and often expanded.
A few sections split out into their own pages.
Still need to do all the other commands..
|
Joey Hess
mark@6b90344cdab3158eacb94a3944460d138afc9bef
Øyvind A. Holm
Antoine Beaupré