| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
| |
Word so warnings can be included, not only errors.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Added --json-error-messages option, which includes error messages in the
json output, rather than outputting them to stderr.
The actual rediretion of errors is not implemented yet, this is only
the docs and option plumbing.
This commit was supported by the NSF-funded DataLad project.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There was documentation in 7a3aafe76274a9e54395acb8ec2ce351888495de,
but it was lost in the man page split.
I don't know if this --force is very useful. Considered removing it
instead..
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* move --to=here moves from all reachable remotes to the local repository.
The output of move --from remote is changed slightly, when the remote and
local both have the content. It used to say:
move foo ok
Now:
move foo (from theremote...) ok
That was done so that, when move --to=here is used and the content is
locally present and also in several remotes, it's clear which remotes the
content gets dropped from.
Note that move --to=here will report an error if a non-reachable remote
contains the file, even if the local repository also contains the file. I
think that's reasonable; the user may be intending to move all other copies
of the file from remotes.
OTOH, if a copy of the file is believed to be present in some repository
that is not a configured remote, move --to=here does not report an error.
So a little bit inconsistent, but erroring in this case feels wrong.
copy --to=here came along for free, but it's basically the same behavior as
git-annex get, and probably with not as good messages in edge cases
(especially on failure), so I've not documented it.
This commit was sponsored by Anthony DeRobertis on Patreon.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Note that get --from foo --failed will get things that a previous get --from bar
tried and failed to get, etc. I considered making --failed only retry
transfers from the same remote, but it was easier, and seems more useful,
to not have the same remote requirement.
Noisy due to some refactoring into Types/
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Added --branch option to copy, drop, fsck, get, metadata, mirror, move, and
whereis commands. This option makes git-annex operate on files that are
included in a specified branch (or other treeish).
The names of the files from the branch that are being operated on are not
displayed yet; only the keys. Displaying the filenames will need changes
to every affected command.
Also, note that --branch can be specified repeatedly. This is not really
documented, but seemed worth supporting, especially since we may later want
the ability to operate on all branches matching a refspec. However, when
operating on two branches that contain the same key, that key will be
operated on twice.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
i found that most man pages only had references to the main git-annex
manpage, which i stillfind pretty huge and hard to navigate through.
i tried to sift through all the man pages and add cross-references
between relevant pages. my general rule of thumb is that links should
be both ways unless one of the pages is a more general page that would
become ridiculously huge if all backlinks would be added
(git-annex-preferred-content comes to mind).
i have also make the links one per line as this is how it was done in
the metadata pages so far.
i did everything but the plumbing, utility and test commands, although
some of those are linked from the other commands so cross-links were
added there as well.
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
Command/Fsck.hs
Messages.hs
Remote/Directory.hs
Remote/Git.hs
Remote/Helper/Special.hs
Types/Remote.hs
debian/changelog
git-annex.cabal
|
| | | |
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This works, and seems fairly robust. Clean get of 20 files at -J3. At -J10,
there are some messages about ssh multiplexing, probably due to a race
spinning up the ssh connection cacher. But, it manages to get all the files
ok regardless.
The progress bars are a scrambled mess though, due to bugs in
ascii-progress, which I've already filed. Particularly this one:
https://github.com/yamadapc/haskell-ascii-progress/issues/8
|
| |
|
|
| |
Not a behavior change unless you were passing it to a command that ignored it.
|
| | |
|
|
|
Common command man pages all split out and often expanded.
A few sections split out into their own pages.
Still need to do all the other commands..
|
Joey Hess
Antoine Beaupré