| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
subdirectories. Could affect various parts of git-annex.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
that doesn't exist, or cannot be read
The problem is its use of unsafeInterleaveIO, which causes its IO code
to run when the thunk is forced, outside any exception trapping the caller
may do.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This *may* now return Add or Delete Changes as appropriate. All I know
for sure is that it compiles.
I had hoped to avoid maintaining my own state about the content of the
directory tree, and rely on git to check what was changed. But I can't;
I need to know about new and deleted subdirectories to add them to the
watch list, and git doesn't deal with (empty) directories.
So, wrote all the code to scan directories, remember their past contents,
compare with current contents, generate appropriate Change events, and
update bookkeeping info appropriately.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Baked into the code was an assumption that a repository's git directory
could be determined by adding ".git" to its work tree (or nothing for bare
repos). That fails when core.worktree, or GIT_DIR and GIT_WORK_TREE are
used to separate the two.
This was attacked at the type level, by storing the gitdir and worktree
separately, so Nothing for the worktree means a bare repo.
A complication arose because we don't learn where a repository is bare
until its configuration is read. So another Location type handles
repositories that have not had their config read yet. I am not entirely
happy with this being a Location type, rather than representing them
entirely separate from the Git type. The new code is not worse than the
old, but better types could enforce more safety.
Added support for core.worktree. Overriding it with -c isn't supported
because it's not really clear what to do if a git repo's config is read, is
not bare, and is then overridden to bare. What is the right git directory
in this case? I will worry about this if/when someone has a use case for
overriding core.worktree with -c. (See Git.Config.updateLocation)
Also removed and renamed some functions like gitDir and workTree that
misused git's terminology.
One minor regression is known: git annex add in a bare repository does not
print a nice error message, but runs git ls-files in a way that fails
earlier with a less nice error message. This is because before --work-tree
was always passed to git commands, even in a bare repo, while now it's not.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
ghc 7.4 comaplains about use of System.IO.Error to catch exceptions.
Ok, use Control.Exception, with variants specialized to only catch IO
exceptions.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This drops the >>! and >>? with the nice low fixity. IfElse does have
undocumented >>=>>! and >>=>>? operators, but I deem that too fishy.
Anyway, using whenM and unlessM is easier; I sometimes mixed the operators
up.
|
| | |
|
|
|
The only fully supported thing is to have the main repository on one disk,
and .git/annex on another. Only commands that move data in/out of the annex
will need to copy it across devices.
There is only partial support for putting arbitrary subdirectories of
.git/annex on different devices. For one thing, but this can require more
copies to be done. For example, when .git/annex/tmp is on one device, and
.git/annex/journal on another, every journal write involves a call to
mv(1). Also, there are a few places that make hard links between various
subdirectories of .git/annex with createLink, that are not handled.
In the common case without cross-device, the new moveFile is actually
faster than renameFile, avoiding an unncessary stat to check that a file
(not a directory) is being moved. Of course if a cross-device move is
needed, it is as slow as mv(1) of the data.
|
Joey Hess