| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| ... | |
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There's a race adding a new file to the annex: The file is moved to the
annex and replaced with a symlink, and then we git add the symlink. If
someone comes along in the meantime and replaces the symlink with
something else, such as a new large file, we add that instead. Which could
be bad..
This race is fixed by avoiding using git add, instead the symlink is
directly staged into the index.
It would be nice to make `git annex add` use this same technique.
I have not done so yet because it currently runs git update-index once per
file, which would slow does `git annex add`. A future enhancement would be
to extend the Git.Queue to include the ability to run update-index with
a list of Streamers.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Uses a MVar again, as there seems no other way to thread the state through
inotify events.
This is a rather unsatisfactory result. I had wanted to run them in
the same monad so that the git queue could be used to coleasce git commands
and speed things up. But, that led to fragility: If several files are
added, and one is removed before queue flush, git add will fail to add
any of them. So, the queue is still explicitly flushed after each add for
now.
TODO: Investigate using git add --ignore-errors. This would need to be done
in Command.Add. And, git add still exits nonzero with it, so would need
to avoid crashing on queue flush.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
The queue is still flushed on add, because each add event is handled by a
separate Annex monad. That needs to be fixed to speed up add a lot.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
When a file is added, and then deleted before the add action runs,
the delete event was unhappy that the file never did get staged.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When a new file is annexed, a deletion event occurs when it's moved away
to be replaced by a symlink. Most of the time, there is no problimatic
race, because the same thread runs the add event as the deletion event.
So, once the symlink is in place, the deletion code won't run at all,
due to existing checks that a deleted file is really gone.
But there is a race at startup, as then the inotify thread is running
at the same time as the main thread, which does the initial tree walking
and annexing. It would be possible for the deletion inotify to run
in a perfect race with the addition, and remove the newly added symlink
from the git cache.
To solve this race, added event serialization via a MVar. We putMVar
before running each event, which blocks if an event is already running.
And when an event finishes (or crashes!), we takeMVar to free the lock.
Also, make rm -rf not spew warnings by passing --ignore-unmatch when
deleting directories.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
And just like that, annexed files can be moved and copies around within
the tree, and are automatically fixed to point to the content, and staged
in git. Huzzah!
Delete still remains TODO, with its troublesome race during add..
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
When a directory is deleted, or moved away, git rm -r it to stage
the deletion.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Improved the inotify code, so it will also notice directory removal
and symlink creation.
In the watch code, optimised away a stat of a file that's being added,
that's done by Command.Add.start. This is the reason symlink creation is
handled separately from file creation, since during initial tree walk
at startup, a stat was already done, and can be reused.
|
|
|
So far this only handles auto-annexing new files that are created inside
the repository while it's running. To make this really useful,
it needs to at least:
- notice deleted files and stage the deletion
(tricky; there's a race with add..)
- notice renamed files, auto-fix the symlink, and stage the new file location
- periodically auto-commit staged changes
- honor .gitignore, not adding files it excludes
Also nice to have would be:
- Somehow sync remotes, possibly using a push sync like dvcs-autosync
does, so they are immediately updated.
- Somehow get content that is unavilable. This is problimatic with inotify,
since we only get an event once the user has tried (and failed) to read
from the file. Perhaps instead, automatically copy content that is added
out to remotes, with the goal of all repos eventually getting a copy,
if df allows.
- Drop files that have not been used lately, or meet some other criteria
(as long as there's a copy elsewhere).
- Perhaps automatically dropunused files that have been deleted,
although I cannot see a way to do that, since by the time the inotify
deletion event arrives, the file is deleted, and we cannot see what
its symlink pointed to! Alternatievely, perhaps automatically
do an expensive unused/dropunused cleanup process.
Some of this probably needs the currently stateless threads to maintain
a common state.
|
Joey Hess