| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
| |
Necessary for push messages to not override the previously sent tag.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
client is a git-annex client.
I only added this to the presense messages that are really intended for
presence. The ones used for tunneling git etc don't have the tag, because
that would waste bandwidth.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
I noticed that when my modem hung up and redialed, my xmpp client was left
sending messages into the void. This will also handle any idle
disconnection issues.
|
| |
|
|
| |
compatibility with previous versions of git-annex, which will refuse to accept any XMPP pushes from this version.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(Except for the actual streaming of receive-pack through XMPP, which
can only run once we've gotten an appropriate uuid in a push initiation
message.)
Pushes are now only initiated when the initiation message comes from a
known uuid. This allows multiple distinct repositories to use the same xmpp
address.
Note: This probably breaks initial push after xmpp pairing, because at that
point we may not know about the paired uuid, and so reject the push from
it. It won't break in simple cases, because the annex-uuid of the remote
is checked. However, when there are multiple clients behind a single xmpp
address, only uuid of the first is recorded in annex-uuid, and so any
pushes from the others will be rejected (unless the first remote pushes their
uuids to us beforehand.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For backwards compatability, "" is treated as "0" sequence number.
--debug will show xmpp sequence numbers now, but they are not otherwise
used.
|
| |
|
|
| |
the problems Google Talk has with not always sending presence messages to clients.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
I have a theory that some google xmpp servers don't send prsense for xa
clients, while others do. Seeing some weird lack of presence messages
sometimes there.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This should help prevent git-annex clients receiving messages that
were intended for normal clients they're sharing the account with.
Changed XMPP protocol use to always send chat messages directed at the
specific client, as the negative priority blocks less directed messages.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I decided to use the fallback push mode from the beginning for XMPP, since
while it uses some ugly branches, it avoids the possibility of a normal
push failing, and needing to pull and re-push. Due to the overhead of XMPP,
and the difficulty of building such a chain of actions due to the async
implementation, this seemed reasonable.
It seems to work great!
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
This improves type safety.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Allow the tag to contain a value. Better extraction of the attribute value.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Along the way, significantly cleaned up Assistant.XMPP, and made XMPP
message decoding more efficient.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Maybe the spec allows it, but broadcasting self-directed presence info to
all buddies is just insane.
I had to bring back the IQ messages for self-pairing, while still using
directed presence for other pairing. Ugly.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Testing between Google Talk and prosody, the directed IQ messages
were not received. Google Talk probably only relays them between
clients using the same account.
I first tried even more directed presence, with each client JID being sent
a separate presence, but that didn't work on Google Talk, particularly
it was ignored when one client sent it to another client using the same
account.
So, presence directed at the user@host of the client to pair with. Tested
working between Google Talk and prosody (in both directions), as well
as between two clients with the same account on Google Talk, and
two clients with the same account on prosody.
Only problem with this form of directed presence is that if I also use it
for git pushes, more clients than are interested in a push's data will
receive it. So I may need some better approach, or a hybrid between
directed IQ and directed presence.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Amusingly, I am not really using xmpp ping for pairing. I forgot to put in
the ping tag! And when I did, it stopped working, on Google Talk. Seems
it handles client to client pings, at least using the same JID, without
actually sending them to the end client. My mistake avoided this,
and seems to work, so I've left it as-is for now, with just the git-annex
tag in an IQ message. Also tested on prosody.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Rest of pairing process still to do.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This ensures that clients that have not sent presence in a while will show
up in the list.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Will be used for finding other git-annex clients for pairing
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Adjust build deps to ensure that only a fixed version of the library will
be used.
Also, removed the bound thread stuff, which I now think was (probably)
a red herring.
|
| |
|
Joey Hess