| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Dropping a key from a local remote ran git-annex-shell unnecessarily.
Now git-annex-shell is never used when acting on a local remote.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Done by adding a oneshot mode, in which location log changes are written to
the journal, but not committed. Taking advantage of git-annex's existing
ability to recover in this situation.
This is used by git-annex-shell and other places where changes are made to
a remote's location log.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 6da40100c99a097401fb130b63edc05b18f61249.
On closer examinaton, this change is wrong. The bup special remote
can be configured with "buprepo=", which makes it use the default
~/.bup repo. This change makes it use a different temp dir each time,
which I'm sure would not be appreciated by anyone with that
configuration.
Bup insisting in creating ~/.bup even when using a different repo
does seem like a bug in *something*, but I'm leaning toward the bug
being in bup itself.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |\ |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |/
|
|
| |
Not used in git-annex, but I am using it in git-backup
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This drops the >>! and >>? with the nice low fixity. IfElse does have
undocumented >>=>>! and >>=>>? operators, but I deem that too fishy.
Anyway, using whenM and unlessM is easier; I sometimes mixed the operators
up.
|
| |
|
|
| |
a stricter (but also partial) readMaybe is getting added to base
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
So the user can override them.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Ssh connection caching is now enabled automatically by git-annex. Only one
ssh connection is made to each host per git-annex run, which can speed some
things up a lot, as well as avoiding repeated password prompts. Concurrent
git-annex processes also share ssh connections. Cached ssh connections are
shut down when git-annex exits.
Note: The rsync special remote does not yet participate in the ssh
connection caching.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Avoids expensive file transfers, at the expense of checking file size
and/or contents.
Required some reworking of the remote code.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Avoids possible repeated password prompts, at the cost of a small bit of
locking complication.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For a local git remote, can symlink the file.
For a git remote using rsync, can preseed any local content.
There are a few reasons to use fsck --from on a normal git remote.
One is if it's using gitosis or similar, and you don't have shell access
to run git annex locally. Another reason could be if you just want to
fsck certian files of a bare remote.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Since the content might be symlinked into place, it's not appropriate to
use withTmp here.
|
| |
|
|
| |
No need to copy anything, just symlink to the file.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
When a file is present locally, the remote's version can be rsynced to
a copy of it, which will avoid wasting a lot of bandwidth.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add news item recommending fscking directory special remotes.
Remote news item about URL backend being removed; it was later added back
to be used by git annex addurl --fast.
Link NEWS into top level.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fscking a remote is now supported. It's done by retrieving
the contents of the specified files from the remote, and checking them,
so can be an expensive operation.
(Several optimisations are possible, to speed it up, of course.. This is
the slow and stupid remote fsck to start with.)
Still, if the remote is a special remote, or a git repository that you
cannot run fsck in locally, it's nice to have the ability to fsck it.
If you have any directory special remotes, now would be a good time to
fsck them, in case you were hit by the data loss bug fixed in the
previous release!
|
| |
|
|
| |
This way it's clear when a backend does not implement its own fsck checks.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When moving a file to the remote failed, and partially transferred content
was left behind in the directory, re-running the same move would think it
succeeded and delete the local copy.
I reproduced data loss when moving files to a partition that was almost
full. Interrupting a transfer could have similar results.
Easily fixed by using a temp file which is then moved atomically into place
once the transfer completes.
I've audited other calls to copyFileExternal, and other special remote
file transfer code; everything else seems to use temp files correctly
(rsync, git), or otherwise use atomic transfers (bup, S3).
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
forum/__91__Installation__93___There_is_no_available_version_of_quickcheck_that_satisfies___62____61__2.1.mdwn to forum/__91__Installation__93___base-3.0.3.2_requires_syb___61____61__0.1.0.2_however_syb-0.1.0.2_was_excluded_because_json-0.5_requires_syb___62____61__0.3.3.mdwn
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
Joey Hess
https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawk6QAwUsFHpr3Km1yQbg8hf3S7RDYf7hX4
http://joey.kitenet.net/
Lauri Alanko
https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawlB7-aXsqwzOi2BIR_Q4sUF8sjj24H6F3c
https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawnBJ6Dv1glxzzi4qIzGFNa6F-mfHIvv9Ck
https://openid.stackexchange.com/user/fd55c6e3-966a-4626-865f-5d0f73e1eb88