summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r--doc/bugs/Problems_running_make_on_osx/comment_17_62fccb04b0e4b695312f7a3f32fb96ee._comment43
-rw-r--r--doc/bugs/Problems_running_make_on_osx/comment_18_64fab50d95de619eb2e8f08f90237de1._comment24
-rw-r--r--doc/bugs/Problems_running_make_on_osx/comment_19_4253988ed178054c8b6400beeed68a29._comment11
-rw-r--r--doc/bugs/Problems_running_make_on_osx/comment_20_7db27d1a22666c831848bc6c06d66a84._comment10
4 files changed, 88 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/Problems_running_make_on_osx/comment_17_62fccb04b0e4b695312f7a3f32fb96ee._comment b/doc/bugs/Problems_running_make_on_osx/comment_17_62fccb04b0e4b695312f7a3f32fb96ee._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..7c7200fb9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/Problems_running_make_on_osx/comment_17_62fccb04b0e4b695312f7a3f32fb96ee._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawkSq2FDpK2n66QRUxtqqdbyDuwgbQmUWus"
+ nickname="Jimmy"
+ subject="comment 17"
+ date="2011-02-13T10:46:54Z"
+ content="""
+Yeap, that did the trick. I just tested a few separate OSX 10.6.6 systems and the tests are better behaved now, only 3 failures now.
+
+So the tests behave better (at least we don't get resource fork errors any more)
+
+ * after the commit c319a3 without modifying the system limits (of 266 procs per user)
+ * without the commit c319a3 and when I increase the system process limits to as much as OSX allows
+
+On all the systems I tested on, I'm down to 3 failures now.
+
+<pre>
+### Failure in: 1:blackbox:3:git-annex unannex:1:with content
+foo is not a symlink
+### Failure in: 1:blackbox:4:git-annex drop:0:no remotes
+drop wrongly succeeded with no known copy of file
+Cases: 30 Tried: 20 Errors: 0 Failures: 2add foo ok
+ok
+Cases: 30 Tried: 24 Errors: 0 Failures: 2 Only 1 of 2 trustworthy copies of foo exist.
+ Back it up with git-annex copy.
+ Only 1 of 2 trustworthy copies of sha1foo exist.
+ Back it up with git-annex copy.
+ Bad file size; moved to /Users/jtang/develop/git-annex/.t/tmprepo/.git/annex/bad/WORM:1297594011:20:foo
+ Bad file content; moved to /Users/jtang/develop/git-annex/.t/tmprepo/.git/annex/bad/SHA1:ee80d2cec57a3810db83b80e1b320df3a3721ffa
+### Failure in: 1:blackbox:12:git-annex fsck:1
+fsck failed to fail with content only available in untrusted (current) repository
+Cases: 30 Tried: 26 Errors: 0 Failures: 3 Only 1 of 2 trustworthy copies of foo exist.
+ Back it up with git-annex copy.
+ The following untrusted locations may also have copies:
+ 90d63906-375e-11e0-8867-abb8a6368269 -- test repo
+ Only 1 of 2 trustworthy copies of sha1foo exist.
+ Back it up with git-annex copy.
+ The following untrusted locations may also have copies:
+ 90d63906-375e-11e0-8867-abb8a6368269 -- test repo
+Cases: 30 Tried: 30 Errors: 0 Failures: 3
+</pre>
+
+It's the same set of failures across all the OSX systems that I have tested on. Now I just need to figure out why there are still these three failures.
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/bugs/Problems_running_make_on_osx/comment_18_64fab50d95de619eb2e8f08f90237de1._comment b/doc/bugs/Problems_running_make_on_osx/comment_18_64fab50d95de619eb2e8f08f90237de1._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..df76bb301
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/Problems_running_make_on_osx/comment_18_64fab50d95de619eb2e8f08f90237de1._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawkSq2FDpK2n66QRUxtqqdbyDuwgbQmUWus"
+ nickname="Jimmy"
+ subject="maybe killed another osx bug in the test."
+ date="2011-02-13T15:12:10Z"
+ content="""
+I think I have figured out why
+
+ ### Failure in: 1:blackbox:3:git-annex unannex:1:with content
+ foo is not a symlink
+
+It goes back to the this piece of code (in test.hs)
+
+ copyrepo :: FilePath -> FilePath -> IO FilePath
+ copyrepo old new = do
+ cleanup new
+ ensuretmpdir
+ Utility.boolSystem \"cp\" [\"-pr\", old, new] @? \"cp -pr failed\"
+
+It seems that on OSX it does not preserve the symbolic link information, basically cp is not gnu cp on OSX, doing a \"cp -a SOURCE DEST\" seem's to the right thing on OSX. I tried it out on my archlinux workstation by replacing *-pr* with just *-a* and all the tests passed on archlinux.
+
+I'm not sure what the implications would be with changing the test with changing the cp command.
+
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/bugs/Problems_running_make_on_osx/comment_19_4253988ed178054c8b6400beeed68a29._comment b/doc/bugs/Problems_running_make_on_osx/comment_19_4253988ed178054c8b6400beeed68a29._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..090c991c3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/Problems_running_make_on_osx/comment_19_4253988ed178054c8b6400beeed68a29._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawkSq2FDpK2n66QRUxtqqdbyDuwgbQmUWus"
+ nickname="Jimmy"
+ subject="comment 19"
+ date="2011-02-13T15:55:47Z"
+ content="""
+On second thought and after some messing (trying most of the options and combinations of options on OSX for).... I tried replacing cp with gnu cp from coreutils on my OSX install, and all the tests passed. *sigh* cp -a is preserving some permissions and attributes but not all, its not behaving in the same way as the gnu cp does... the closet thing that I have found on OSX that behaves in the same way as gnu \"cp -pr\" is to use \"ditto\".
+
+Just doing a \"ditto SOURCE DEST\" in the tests passes everything. I'm not sure if its a good idea to use this even though it works. Though this is just the tests, does it affect CopyFile.hs where \"cp\" is called?
+
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/bugs/Problems_running_make_on_osx/comment_20_7db27d1a22666c831848bc6c06d66a84._comment b/doc/bugs/Problems_running_make_on_osx/comment_20_7db27d1a22666c831848bc6c06d66a84._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..b617da926
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/Problems_running_make_on_osx/comment_20_7db27d1a22666c831848bc6c06d66a84._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joey.kitenet.net/"
+ nickname="joey"
+ subject="comment 20"
+ date="2011-02-13T17:54:09Z"
+ content="""
+Outside the test suite, git-annex's actual use of cp puts fairly low demands on it. It tries to use cp -a or cp -p if available just to preserve whatever attributes it can preserve, but the worst case if that you have a symlink pointing to a file that doesn't have the original timestamp or whatever. And there's little expectation git preserves that stuff anyway.
+
+I will probably try to make the test suite entirely use git clone rather than cp.
+"""]]