summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r--doc/design/adjusted_branches/comment_1_5bdbf54ae75f77c69c8f557f4dbac13d._comment10
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/design/adjusted_branches/comment_1_5bdbf54ae75f77c69c8f557f4dbac13d._comment b/doc/design/adjusted_branches/comment_1_5bdbf54ae75f77c69c8f557f4dbac13d._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..36f2db306
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/design/adjusted_branches/comment_1_5bdbf54ae75f77c69c8f557f4dbac13d._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="https://me.yahoo.com/a/EbvxpTI_xP9Aod7Mg4cwGhgjrCrdM5s-#7c0f4"
+ subject="would it be possible to get a branch only with annexed content?"
+ date="2016-02-25T03:04:26Z"
+ content="""
+I am yet to grasp all the glorious plans here, but wondered to ask: it seems like it then should be possible to establish a branch only with annexed archive? may be matching some preferred content expression?
+Usecase: a relatively large git/annex repository mixing in code, large data files, and some pre-built binaries. If I could seamlessly and reproducibly (with the progress of their master) tease those apart (for separate Debian packaging ;)), that would be really handy
+
+[[!meta author=yoh]]
+"""]]