diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
2 files changed, 35 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/fsck_claims_failed_checksum_when_less_copies_than_required_are_found.mdwn b/doc/bugs/fsck_claims_failed_checksum_when_less_copies_than_required_are_found.mdwn index 3f1d28d3d..57c80d7ca 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/fsck_claims_failed_checksum_when_less_copies_than_required_are_found.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/fsck_claims_failed_checksum_when_less_copies_than_required_are_found.mdwn @@ -16,3 +16,6 @@ >>> I think you're misreading the truncated output you posted. The actual, >>> full output would make much more sense. --[[Joey]] + +>>>> No. I have a total of 14908 annex keys, 3333 of which are on a remote. The only message other than 'checksum OK' and the above is 'git-annex: 11577 failed'. +>>>> I checked several files manually, their checksums are OK so `git annex status` is reporting those files as completely failed when they "only" miss copies. -- Richard diff --git a/doc/bugs/wishlist:_query_things_like_description__44___trust_level/comment_2_342d1ac07573c7ef4e27f003a692e261._comment b/doc/bugs/wishlist:_query_things_like_description__44___trust_level/comment_2_342d1ac07573c7ef4e27f003a692e261._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3bb92919f --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/wishlist:_query_things_like_description__44___trust_level/comment_2_342d1ac07573c7ef4e27f003a692e261._comment @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawl9sYlePmv1xK-VvjBdN-5doOa_Xw-jH4U" + nickname="Richard" + subject="comment 2" + date="2011-10-29T18:28:13Z" + content=""" +Possible solutions: + +This: + + trusted repositories: + UUID -- foo + semi-trusted repositories: + UUID -- bar + untrusted repositories: + UUID -- baz + +or this: + + UUID -- trusted -- foo + UUID -- semi-trusted -- bar + UUID -- untrusted -- baz + +or this: + + known repositories (!/*/X): + UUID -- ! foo + UUID -- * bar + UUID -- X baz + +If you want to reformat this output, putting 'here', 'origin', etc into fixed formatting might make sense, as well. -- Richard +"""]] |