summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/todo
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/todo')
-rw-r--r--doc/todo/Use_bitcoin-mining_ASICs_for_hashing__63__/comment_1_a93805a8088402c6dc32d2b9785fcc7d._comment10
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/Use_bitcoin-mining_ASICs_for_hashing__63__/comment_1_a93805a8088402c6dc32d2b9785fcc7d._comment b/doc/todo/Use_bitcoin-mining_ASICs_for_hashing__63__/comment_1_a93805a8088402c6dc32d2b9785fcc7d._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..952978834
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/todo/Use_bitcoin-mining_ASICs_for_hashing__63__/comment_1_a93805a8088402c6dc32d2b9785fcc7d._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ ip="209.250.56.172"
+ subject="comment 1"
+ date="2014-02-20T17:42:10Z"
+ content="""
+I feel that Helmut has the right approach to this general type of thing.
+
+I doubt that bitcoin ASICs feature a fast data transfer bus, because bitcoin is a pretty low-data-volume protocol. Additionally AIUI, bitcoin ASICs get their speed by hashing in parallel, which allows them to try many variations of a block at once. So they probably rely on most of the data remaining the same and only a small amount changing. So it's doubtful this would be a win.
+"""]]