summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/todo/support_fsck_in_bare_repos.mdwn
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/todo/support_fsck_in_bare_repos.mdwn')
-rw-r--r--doc/todo/support_fsck_in_bare_repos.mdwn17
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/support_fsck_in_bare_repos.mdwn b/doc/todo/support_fsck_in_bare_repos.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..32ced467e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/todo/support_fsck_in_bare_repos.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+What is says on the tin:
+
+ 22:56:54 < RichiH> joeyh_: by the way, i have been thinking about fsck on bare repos
+ 22:57:37 < RichiH> joeyh_: the best i could come with is to have a bare and a non-bare access the same repo store
+ 22:58:00 < RichiH> joeyh_: alternatively, with the SHA* backend, you have all the information to verify that the local data is correct
+ 22:58:41 < RichiH> and verifying that would already be a plus. if there really _is_ a problem, having the SHA is enough to track issues down
+ 23:09:50 < joeyh_> oh, I think I have code that fsck could use on bare repos already.. just a matter of wiring it up
+ 23:10:42 < joeyh_> feel free to reopen a bug or whatever so I remember.. the unused command's branch content enumeration could be used in a bare repo
+ 23:14:51 < joeyh_> unused/dropunused could work in bare repos too btw
+
+> Also `status`'s total annex keys/size could be handled for bare repos. --[[Joey]]
+
+>> Fsck is done. Rest not done yet. --[[Joey]]
+
+>>> all [[done]]! --[[Joey]]
+
+[[!meta title="support unused, dropunused in bare repos"]]