summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/todo/support_fsck_in_bare_repos.mdwn
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/todo/support_fsck_in_bare_repos.mdwn')
-rw-r--r--doc/todo/support_fsck_in_bare_repos.mdwn17
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/support_fsck_in_bare_repos.mdwn b/doc/todo/support_fsck_in_bare_repos.mdwn
deleted file mode 100644
index 32ced467e..000000000
--- a/doc/todo/support_fsck_in_bare_repos.mdwn
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
-What is says on the tin:
-
- 22:56:54 < RichiH> joeyh_: by the way, i have been thinking about fsck on bare repos
- 22:57:37 < RichiH> joeyh_: the best i could come with is to have a bare and a non-bare access the same repo store
- 22:58:00 < RichiH> joeyh_: alternatively, with the SHA* backend, you have all the information to verify that the local data is correct
- 22:58:41 < RichiH> and verifying that would already be a plus. if there really _is_ a problem, having the SHA is enough to track issues down
- 23:09:50 < joeyh_> oh, I think I have code that fsck could use on bare repos already.. just a matter of wiring it up
- 23:10:42 < joeyh_> feel free to reopen a bug or whatever so I remember.. the unused command's branch content enumeration could be used in a bare repo
- 23:14:51 < joeyh_> unused/dropunused could work in bare repos too btw
-
-> Also `status`'s total annex keys/size could be handled for bare repos. --[[Joey]]
-
->> Fsck is done. Rest not done yet. --[[Joey]]
-
->>> all [[done]]! --[[Joey]]
-
-[[!meta title="support unused, dropunused in bare repos"]]