diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/todo/faster_gnupg_cipher/comment_2_36e1f227a320527653500b445f7c001c._comment')
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/todo/faster_gnupg_cipher/comment_2_36e1f227a320527653500b445f7c001c._comment | 12 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/faster_gnupg_cipher/comment_2_36e1f227a320527653500b445f7c001c._comment b/doc/todo/faster_gnupg_cipher/comment_2_36e1f227a320527653500b445f7c001c._comment deleted file mode 100644 index 08f69d6b8..000000000 --- a/doc/todo/faster_gnupg_cipher/comment_2_36e1f227a320527653500b445f7c001c._comment +++ /dev/null @@ -1,12 +0,0 @@ -[[!comment format=mdwn - username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawl9sYlePmv1xK-VvjBdN-5doOa_Xw-jH4U" - nickname="Richard" - subject="comment 2" - date="2013-08-02T07:21:50Z" - content=""" -Using symmetric keys is significantly cheaper, computation-wise. - -The scheme of encrypting symmetric keys with asymmetric ones is ancient, well-proven, and generally accepted as a good approach. - -Using per-key files makes access control more fine-grained and is only a real performance issue once while creating the private key and a little bit every time more than one file needs to be decrypted as more than one symmetric key needs to be taken care of. -"""]] |