summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/forum
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/forum')
-rw-r--r--doc/forum/Sync_without_jabber_account/comment_1_3e95ac2e67451f953cf0538094109f8b._comment10
-rw-r--r--doc/forum/git_annex_copy_--fast_--to_blah_much_slower_than_--from_blah/comment_1_5b6e0b749b01a97a6b52a2c1cca6e35a._comment12
-rw-r--r--doc/forum/safely_dropping_git-annex_history/comment_6_410a7296c2cee16d3d5bb618a5a41c1d._comment10
-rw-r--r--doc/forum/safely_dropping_git-annex_history/comment_7_42cf492fc98a9eba8176387749ef12e0._comment8
4 files changed, 40 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/forum/Sync_without_jabber_account/comment_1_3e95ac2e67451f953cf0538094109f8b._comment b/doc/forum/Sync_without_jabber_account/comment_1_3e95ac2e67451f953cf0538094109f8b._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..1a601848c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/Sync_without_jabber_account/comment_1_3e95ac2e67451f953cf0538094109f8b._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ ip="4.154.4.90"
+ subject="comment 1"
+ date="2013-07-17T19:06:59Z"
+ content="""
+We don't currently have a way to store a git repository on box.com, and you need such a git repo on a server somewhere if you're not using Jabber.
+
+Of course you can mount the box.com, using either davfs2 or something else, and put a bare git repository in its directory, and if you set this up on multiple computers, it might just work (or they might both try to write to it at the same time and fail.. I have not tried).
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/forum/git_annex_copy_--fast_--to_blah_much_slower_than_--from_blah/comment_1_5b6e0b749b01a97a6b52a2c1cca6e35a._comment b/doc/forum/git_annex_copy_--fast_--to_blah_much_slower_than_--from_blah/comment_1_5b6e0b749b01a97a6b52a2c1cca6e35a._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..90d429278
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/git_annex_copy_--fast_--to_blah_much_slower_than_--from_blah/comment_1_5b6e0b749b01a97a6b52a2c1cca6e35a._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ ip="4.154.4.90"
+ subject="comment 1"
+ date="2013-07-17T19:11:38Z"
+ content="""
+How many files are in the directory tree you're copying?
+
+`copy --fast --to` does indeed avoid the check to see if the remote already has the file before copying it.
+
+However, it still needs to look in the location log to see which files are already present on the remote. Whereas `copy --from` can do a single stat of the file on disk to see if it's present in the local repo. Location log lookups are about as fast as I can make them, but they still require requesting info from out of the git repository. If you have a lot of files this otherwise minor difference in speed can stack up..
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/forum/safely_dropping_git-annex_history/comment_6_410a7296c2cee16d3d5bb618a5a41c1d._comment b/doc/forum/safely_dropping_git-annex_history/comment_6_410a7296c2cee16d3d5bb618a5a41c1d._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..05ac27361
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/safely_dropping_git-annex_history/comment_6_410a7296c2cee16d3d5bb618a5a41c1d._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ ip="4.154.4.90"
+ subject="comment 6"
+ date="2013-07-17T18:57:12Z"
+ content="""
+You can use `git annex fsck --from remote` to verify that every file location tracking thinks is on the remote still is. It's innefficient though -- it has to download the whole file to check the special remote still has the right content! That transfer can be avoided by adding --fast.
+
+This is documented in the man page. :)
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/forum/safely_dropping_git-annex_history/comment_7_42cf492fc98a9eba8176387749ef12e0._comment b/doc/forum/safely_dropping_git-annex_history/comment_7_42cf492fc98a9eba8176387749ef12e0._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..5c10b988c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/safely_dropping_git-annex_history/comment_7_42cf492fc98a9eba8176387749ef12e0._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ ip="4.154.4.90"
+ subject="comment 7"
+ date="2013-07-17T18:59:03Z"
+ content="""
+I don't see any reason why squashing git-annex branch history would not work. If you squash it to the same sha in each clone, things would be very happy, but even if you squash it to different shas, the union merge should result in those different versions of the same data automatically merging together.
+"""]]