summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/design/external_special_remote_protocol/comment_19_89d532a5013af24f15a0d003cbfbab25._comment
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/design/external_special_remote_protocol/comment_19_89d532a5013af24f15a0d003cbfbab25._comment')
-rw-r--r--doc/design/external_special_remote_protocol/comment_19_89d532a5013af24f15a0d003cbfbab25._comment13
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/design/external_special_remote_protocol/comment_19_89d532a5013af24f15a0d003cbfbab25._comment b/doc/design/external_special_remote_protocol/comment_19_89d532a5013af24f15a0d003cbfbab25._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..1a4c180aa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/design/external_special_remote_protocol/comment_19_89d532a5013af24f15a0d003cbfbab25._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="joey"
+ subject="""re: WHEREIS -- is it better to just report failure to avoid duplicates?"""
+ date="2015-09-09T21:03:13Z"
+ content="""
+There's no point in implementing WHEREIS if it's going to reply with the
+same values that are passed to SETURIPRESENT.
+
+Some special remotes may not need to use SETURIPRESENT to work at
+all, and yet storing data on the remote makes it available from some public
+url. This is the kind of situation where it makes sense to implement
+WHEREIS.
+"""]]