diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/bugs/Name_scheme_does_not_follow_git__39__s_rules.mdwn')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/bugs/Name_scheme_does_not_follow_git__39__s_rules.mdwn | 31 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 31 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/Name_scheme_does_not_follow_git__39__s_rules.mdwn b/doc/bugs/Name_scheme_does_not_follow_git__39__s_rules.mdwn deleted file mode 100644 index 722dac50b..000000000 --- a/doc/bugs/Name_scheme_does_not_follow_git__39__s_rules.mdwn +++ /dev/null @@ -1,31 +0,0 @@ -I can create an annex remote named 'test:/test'. git itself does not allow colons in names, though. The name scheme for an annex should be the same as for git repos themselves. - -> What do you mean by "an annex remote"? git-annex uses the same -> remotes configuration as does git. If you put invalid -> stuff in .git/config it might handle it slightly different than -> git, I don't know. Examples needed. --[[Joey]] - ->> What I mean is this: - - % cd 1 - % git init - % git annex init "my:colon" - % [...] - % cd ../2 - % git init - % git annex init "second" - % git remote add "my:colon" ../1 - fatal: 'my:colon' is not a valid remote name - ->> -- RichiH - ->>> I see.. Git annex init does not specifiy a remote's name, it specifies ->>> an arbitrary human-readable description of the repository, which will ->>> be displayed when there is no configured remote corresponding to the ->>> repository. So this is not a bug unless some documentation of that is ->>> unclear. --[[Joey]] - ->>>> Nobody spoke up to say it's unclear, so closing as PEBKAC :) ->>>> [[done]] --[[Joey]] - ->>>>> I still think git-annex should follow the same rules as git in this regard, but if your design decision is different, I won't try to argue the point :) -- RichiH |