summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/bugs/Can__39__t_get_content_from_S3_with_s3-aws_library/comment_12_1ba3271a62b8ce8088c67e4741ecf385._comment
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/bugs/Can__39__t_get_content_from_S3_with_s3-aws_library/comment_12_1ba3271a62b8ce8088c67e4741ecf385._comment')
-rw-r--r--doc/bugs/Can__39__t_get_content_from_S3_with_s3-aws_library/comment_12_1ba3271a62b8ce8088c67e4741ecf385._comment32
1 files changed, 32 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/Can__39__t_get_content_from_S3_with_s3-aws_library/comment_12_1ba3271a62b8ce8088c67e4741ecf385._comment b/doc/bugs/Can__39__t_get_content_from_S3_with_s3-aws_library/comment_12_1ba3271a62b8ce8088c67e4741ecf385._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..3b416f09b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/Can__39__t_get_content_from_S3_with_s3-aws_library/comment_12_1ba3271a62b8ce8088c67e4741ecf385._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="joey"
+ subject="""fully reproduced"""
+ date="2015-04-24T16:33:02Z"
+ content="""
+I was able to fully reproduce this bug! I installed the old version of
+git-annex that used the S3 library, and made a remote:
+
+ joey@darkstar:~/tmp/rrold>git annex initremote S3 type=S3 encryption=none datacenter=ap-southeast-1
+ initremote S3 (checking bucket...) (creating bucket in ap-southeast-1...) ok
+ joey@darkstar:~/tmp/rrold>git annex move me --to S3
+ move me (checking S3...) (to S3...)
+ ok
+
+Retrieval then failed using current git-annex.
+
+Also, a remote made with the old git-annex with datacenter=ap-southeast-2
+fails with the new git-annex.
+
+Hypothesis: Either the new or the old S3 library must be confusing between
+ap-southeast-1/2. My guess is the old library was just creating and using
+buckets in the wrong place, at least when told to use ap-southeast-*.
+
+---
+
+I cannot reproduce anything about "the upload failed, but git annex thought it succeeded",
+nor do I see any indications in comments 11 or 12 that git-annex's location
+log is failing in any way. The sequence of commands in comment 11 ends with the
+get failing, as it should, since the remote has been switched to a different
+datacenter. I don't understand what you're seeing in comment #12 at all;
+it seems to just show it getting a file successfully.
+"""]]