diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/bugs/__91__PATCH__93___Cosmetic__58___clarify_a_warning_message/comment_2_16c12a55f7d4b862e021e9bc1f8c9788._comment | 10 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/__91__PATCH__93___Cosmetic__58___clarify_a_warning_message/comment_2_16c12a55f7d4b862e021e9bc1f8c9788._comment b/doc/bugs/__91__PATCH__93___Cosmetic__58___clarify_a_warning_message/comment_2_16c12a55f7d4b862e021e9bc1f8c9788._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f100492b3 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/__91__PATCH__93___Cosmetic__58___clarify_a_warning_message/comment_2_16c12a55f7d4b862e021e9bc1f8c9788._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="erics" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/6e5f74c742128e5d98fd672ed6ea4865" + subject="comment 2" + date="2017-12-08T21:11:40Z" + content=""" +It wasn't clear to me that this was just a warning, i.e. that functionality wasn't compromised. The part after the semicolon kind of implies that, but it seems clearer to say so explicitly. + +On second thought, though, the rephrasing probably isn't necessary. Just adding the \"Warning:\" prefix would suffice... +"""]] |